Advertisement

Over-the-Air Proof of Concepts

  • Philippos Tragas
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter we will validate the previously reported concept regarding the capability of transmitting multiple signals (i.e., performing spatial multiplexing) using one RF chain by using the ESPAR antenna that is presented in Chap.  6. The experiments were conducted in the indoor environment of AIT’s B-WiSE Lab, using a 2.6 GHz prototype made of a single active printed dipole coupled to two passive ones and AIT’s MIMO testbed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first over-the-air experiment of spatial multiplexing with a single RF front-end yet to be demonstrated. The use of this specific ESPAR antenna in a cognitive radio context will also be shown. The ESPAR antenna will be used as a secondary transmitter and based on two different scenarios we will measure the interference it will cause to the primary receiver. Finally, a new printed parasitic antenna array with one active and four parasitic elements aiming for maximum beamforming gain toward one direction will be presented.

Keywords

Cognitive Radio Local Oscillator Primary Receiver Baseband Signal Uniform Linear Array 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Philippos Tragas is now working as an RF/Wireless Engineer in Broadcom Corporation.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Kalis, A.G. Kanatas, C.B. Papadias, A novel approach to MIMO transmission using a single RF Front End. IEEE J. Sel. Area. Comm. 26(6), 972 –980 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. Alrabadi, C.B. Papadias, A. Kalis, R. Prasad, A universal encoding scheme for MIMO transmission using a single active element for PSK modulation schemes. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 8(10), 5133 –5142 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. Alrabadi, J. Perruisseau-Carrier, A. Kalis, MIMO transmission using a single RF source: theory and antenna design. IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. 60(2), 654 –664 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Trimble Navigation Limited, Thunderbolt GPS Disciplined Clock, GPS Clock for the Wireless Infrastructure, http://www.trimble.com/products/pdf/thunder.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2012
  5. 5.
    Innovative Integration, SBC62, http://www.innovative-dsp.com/products.php?product=SBC62. Accessed 25 June 2012
  6. 6.
    Innovative Integration, DAC40, http://www.innovative-dsp.com/products.php?product=DAC40. Accessed 26 June 2012
  7. 7.
    National Semiconductor, LMX2306/LMX2316/LMX2326 PLLatinum Low Power Frequency Synthesizer for RF Personal Communications LMX2306 - 550 MHz LMX2316 - 1.2 GHz LMX2326 - 2.8 GHz, http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lmx2326.pdf. Accessed 02 July 2012
  8. 8.
    G.J. Foschini, Layered space-time architecture for wireless communication in a fading environment when using multi-element antennas. Bell Labs. Tech. J. 1(2), pp. 41–59 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Srinivasa, S. Jafar, Cognitive radios for dynamic spectrum access - the throughput potential of cognitive radio: A theoretical perspective. Comm. Mag. IEEE 45(5), 73–79 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Srinivasa, S. Jafar, The throughput potential of cognitive radio: a theoretical perspective, in Fortieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2006. ACSSC ’06, Pacific Grove, CA, 29 October 2006–1 November 2006, pp. 221–225Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Perruisseau-Carrier, O. Alrabadi, A. Kalis, Implementation of a reconfigurable parasitic antenna for beam-space BPSK transmissions, in Microwave Conference (EuMC), 2010 European, Paris, 28–30 September 2010, pp. 644–647Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    O. Alrabadi, C. Papadias, A. Kalis, N. Marchetti, R. Prasad, Mimo transmission and reception techniques using three-element espar antennas. IEEE Comm. Lett. 13(4), 236–238 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eurecom, The Mobile Communications department at EURECOM, http://www.eurecom.fr/cm/. Accessed 15 June 2012
  14. 14.
    The Mobile Communications department at EURECOM, OpenAirInterface, http://www.openairinterface.org/. Accessed 15 June 2012
  15. 15.
    O. Gustafsson, K. Amiri, D. Andersson, A. Blad, C. Bonnet, J. Cavallaro, J. Declerck, A. Dejonghe, P. Eliardsson, M. Glasse, A. Hayar, L. Hollevoet, C. Hunter, M. Joshi, F. Kaltenberger, R. Knopp, K. Le, Z. Miljanic, P. Murphy, F. Naessens, N. Nikaein, D. Nussbaum, R. Pacalet, P. Raghavan, A. Sabharwal, O. Sarode, P. Spasojevic, Y. Sun, H. Tullberg, T. Vander Aa, L. Van der Perre, M. Wetterwald, M. Wu, Architectures for cognitive radio testbeds and demonstrators—an overview, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks Communications. CROWNCOM 2010. Cannes, 9–11 June 2010, pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mentor Graphics, IE3D, Electromagnetic (EM) Design & Simulation Software, http://www.mentor.com/electromagnetic-simulation/. Accessed 12 June 2012
  17. 17.
    Mathworks, MATLAB, http://www.mathworks.com/. Accessed 12 June 2012

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Athens Information Technology (AIT)Broadband Wireless & Sensor Networks (B-WiSE) Research GroupPeaniaGreece

Personalised recommendations