Advertisement

Other Advanced Techniques

  • Alfred DeMaris
  • Steven H. Selman
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter we will learn about several additional advanced multivariate statistical techniques that are finding increasing application in medical research. Multiple imputation is a technique that allows us to “fill in” missing data. Often data on the study endpoint or the explanatory variables are missing for subjects in a study. If these subjects are therefore excluded from analysis, not only do we waste the data that they have provided, but their exclusion also introduces selection bias into the analyses. Multiple imputation allows us to fill in, or impute, the missing data with an estimate of what the data would have been had they been present. Once the data have been imputed, they can be used in any of the types of analyses that are discussed in this primer. Poisson regression and its close relative negative binomial regression are the appropriate models to employ when the study endpoint is a count of the number of events that have occurred to the subject in a given time period. Because counts must be represented by integer values and cannot be negative, we cannot use linear regression for this analysis, for reasons explained below. Propensity-score analysis is a statistical tool that allows us to mimic random assignment to “treatment categories,” even though our data are from an observational study. Although we can control statistically for potentially confounding variables in an observational study, a problem arises if these covariates are imbalanced across groups. That is, the different treatment groups of interest have very different distributions on the covariates. Propensity-score analysis is designed to balance measured covariates across treatment groups in order to more effectively simulate random assignment to treatment. Growth-curve modeling is useful whenever people are studied over time and interest centers on the pattern of change in a quantitative study endpoint over that time period. Because people contribute multiple time points’ worth of measurements to the analysis, linear regression is inadequate to model the complex error term required in these studies. Growth-curve models elegantly incorporate the additional complexity into their structure. Finally, we will consider the dilemma we began with in Chap. 1 involving latent selection factors. What happens if there are one or more unmeasured covariates that might be driving our results? Fixed-effects regression modeling is one technique that, under the right conditions, eliminates the threat from confounds that have not been measured. Several examples from the medical literature will help to illustrate the use of these important techniques.

Keywords

Propensity Score Hypertonic Saline Study Endpoint Unintended Pregnancy Negative Binomial Regression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, P. D. (2005). Fixed effects regression methods for longitudinal data using SAS. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeMaris, A. (2004). Regression with social data: Modeling continuous and limited dependent response variables. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeMaris, A. (2012). Combating self-selection bias in nonexperimental research: A Monte Carlo Study. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  8. DeMaris, A. (2013). Logistic regression: Basic foundations and new directions. In I. B. Weiner (Series Ed.), W. Velicer, & J. Schinka (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 543–570). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. DeMaris, A., Mahoney, A., & Pargament, K. I. (2010). Sanctification of marriage and general religiousness as buffers of the effects of marital inequity. Journal of Family issues, 31, 1255–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeMaris, A., Mahoney, A., & Pargament, K. I. (2011). Doing the scut work of infant care: Does religiousness encourage father involvement? Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 354–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncan, B., & Rees, D. I. (2005). Effect of smoking on depressive symptomatology: A reexamination of data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. American Journal of Epidemiology, 162, 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (2004). Applied longitudinal analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Green, R. C., Schneider, L. S., Amato, D., Beelen, A. P., Wilcock, G., Swabb, E. A., et al. (2009). Effect of tarenflurbil on cognitive decline and activities of daily living in patients with mild Alzheimer disease. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302, 2557–2564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Hewitt, B., & Turrell, G. (2011). Short-term functional health and well-being after marital separation: Does initiator status make a difference? American Journal of Epidemiology, 173, 1308–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, D. R., & Young, R. (2011). Toward best practices in analyzing datasets with missing data: Comparisons and recommendations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 926–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. King, G. (1988). Statistical models for political science event counts: Bias in conventional procedures and evidence for the exponential Poisson regression model. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 838–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahoney, A., Pargament, K. I., & DeMaris, A. (2009). Couples viewing marriage and pregnancy through the lens of the sacred: A descriptive study. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 20, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1984). Components of depressed mood in married men and women: The Center for Epidemiological Studies depression scale. American Journal of Epidemiology, 119, 997–1004.Google Scholar
  21. Nickel, J. C., Gilling, P., Tammela, T. L., Morrill, B. Wilson, T. H., & Rittmaster, R. S. (2011). Comparison of dutasteride and finasteride for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: The Enlarged Prostate International Comparator Study (EPICS). BJU International, 108, 388–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Rosenfeld, M., Ratjen, F., Brumback, L., Daniel, S., Rowbotham, R., McNamara, S., et al. (2012). Inhaled hypertonic saline in infants and children younger than 6 years with cystic fibrosis: The ISIS randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 307, 2269–2277.Google Scholar
  24. Rubin, D. B. (2001). Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2, 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schafer, J. L., & Kang, J. (2008). Average causal effects from nonrandomized studies: A practical guide and simulated example. Psychological Methods, 13, 279–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003) Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Umberson, D., Liu, H., & Powers, D. (2009). Marital status, marital transitions, and body weight. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50, 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wahbi, K., Meune, C., Porcher, R., Becane, H. M., Lazarus, A., Laforet, P., et al. (2012). Electrophysiolgical study with prophylactic pacing and survival in adults with myotonic dystrophy and conduction system disease. Journal of the American Medical Association, 307, 1292–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Zolna, M. R., & Lindberg, L. D. (2012). Unintended pregnancy: Incidence and outcomes among young adult unmarried women in the United States, 2001 and 2008. New York: Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfred DeMaris
    • 1
  • Steven H. Selman
    • 2
  1. 1.Bowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  2. 2.Department of UrologyUniversity of ToledoToledoUSA

Personalised recommendations