Abstract
The need to make decisions with regard to health-care resource use is a fundamental and central problem of health-care policy. Reasoned health-care policy decisions depend on economic evaluations that enable direct comparison between competing health-care proposals in terms of both cost and quality. The cost-benefit analysis is the most complete way of evaluating the cost and quality of health-care proposals, though this method is costly and requires the assignment of a monetary value to health-care outcomes. The cost-effectiveness analysis, which allows a comparison of health-care proposals in terms of cost and QALYs, is more commonly used. Heretofore, most health policy decisions in the United States have been based on implicit data or analyses of cost and quality. It is impossible, however, to make a reasoned health policy decision without knowing both the cost and the quality of health-care proposals, ideally explicitly. With public health-care quality reporting reaching prominence in the current era, the need for explicit cost and quality data is becoming more and more evident.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Remarks by the President on Preventive Care. The White House. Office of the Press Secretary. 10 Feb 2012. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/02/10/remarks-president-preventive-care. Accessed 15 Apr 2012.
Cohen JT, Neumann PJ, Weinstein MC. Does preventive care save money? Health economics and the presidential candidates. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(7):661–3.
Orszag PR, Ellis P. The challenge of rising health care costs–a view from the Congressional Budget Office. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1793–5.
“Value On Life 11 Percent Lower Than 5 Years Ago.” All Things Considered. Melissa Block (host). National Public Radio; 2008 July 11. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92470116. Accessed 30 June 2012.
Lee CP, Chertow GM, Zenios SA. An empiric estimate of the value of life: updating the renal dialysis cost-effectiveness standard. Value Health. 2009;12(1):80–7.
Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
Neuhauser D, Lewicki AM. National health insurance and the sixth stool guaiac. Policy Anal. 1976;2(2):175–96.
Brown K, Burrows C. The sixth stool guaiac test: $47 million that never was. J Health Econ. 1990;9(4):429–45.
Angell M. The truth about the drug companies: how they deceive us and what to do about it. New York: Random House; 2004.
Snyder L, American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism, and Human Rights Committee. American College of Physicians Ethics Manual: sixth edition. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(1 Pt 2):73–104.
“How we work.” NHS. National Institute of Clinical and Health Excellence. 2012. http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/howwework/how_we_work.jsp. Accessed 15 May 2012.
Steinbrook R. Saying no isn’t NICE – the travails of Britain’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(19):1977–81.
Daniels N. Review of “just caring: healthcare rationing and democratic deliberation” by Leonard Fleck. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews; 2010 July 7.
Medline Citation Counts by Year of Publication. U.S. National Library of Medicine. National Institutes of Health; 2012. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/medline_cit_counts_yr_pub.html. Accessed 8 May 2012
Donabedian A. The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment, Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring, vol. I. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press; 1980.
Stulberg JJ, Delaney CP, Neuhauser DV, et al. Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections. JAMA. 2010;303(24):2479–85.
Hawn MT, Vick CC, Richman J, et al. Surgical site infection prevention: time to move beyond the surgical care improvement program. Ann Surg. 2011;254(3):494–9. discussion 499–501.
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, the Committee on Quality of Health Care in America and Institute of Medicine. National Academies Press; 2001. ISBN-10: 0309072808, ISBN-13: 978–0309072809.
Pronovost PJ, Lilford R. Analysis and commentary: a road map for improving the performance of performance measures. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(4):569–73.
Dentzer S. Still crossing the quality chasm–or suspended over it? Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(4):554–5.
Hall BL, Hamilton BH, Richards K, et al. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):363–76.
Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, Title XIII of Division A and Title IV of Division B of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), Pub. L. No. 111–5, (Feb. 17, 2009).
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), Pub. L. No. 111–5, (Feb. 17, 2009).
Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):501–4.
McCullough JS, Casey M, Moscovice I, Prasad S. The effect of health information technology on quality in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(4):647–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Keune, J.D., Hall, B.L. (2013). Understanding Quality and Cost from a Health Policy Perspective. In: Sethi, M., Frist, W. (eds) An Introduction to Health Policy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7735-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7735-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7734-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7735-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)