Skip to main content

Future Directions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Simulations for Personnel Selection

Abstract

The contributors to this book have provided the most comprehensive compilation of personnel selection simulation research and practice to date. In the past 10 years, tremendous advancements have been made in this area, and we are progressing faster than ever before. Future simulations for personnel selection will utilize enhancements in complexity (both in terms of candidate experience and internal design), realism, and engagement. These areas of enhancement will drive us further toward our collective goal of creating assessments in which candidates forget that they are being assessed, and enable us to elicit true measures of the knowledge, skills, abilities and other characteristics (KSAOs) required for job performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Asher, J. J., & Sciarrino, J. A. (1974). Realistic work sample tests: A review. Personnel Psychology, 27, 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, R., & Coughlin, C. (2013). Designing and implementing software and computer skills simulations. In M. S. Fetzer & K. A. Tuzinski (Eds.), Simulations for personnel selection. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, N., & Mago, V. K. (2012). Cross-disciplinary applications of artificial intelligence and pattern recognition: Advancing technologies. PA: Business Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleridge, S. (1906). Biographia literaria. New York: E.P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermi, L., & Mayra, F. (2005). Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: Analysing immersion. In S. Castell & J. Jenson (Ed.). Print proceedings. Changing views: Worlds in play, digital games research association conference proceedings. Vancouver, British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidry, B. W., Rupp, D. E., & Lanik, M. (2013). Tracing cognition with assessment center simulations: Using technology to see in the dark. In M. S. Fetzer & K. A. Tuzinski (Eds.), Simulations for personnel selection. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, S. L., & Meyer, J. M. (2013). Managerial simulations. In M. S. Fetzer & K. A. Tuzinski (Eds.), Simulations for personnel selection. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, B., & Lambert, D. (2013). How to measure contact center skills using multimedia simulations. In M. S. Fetzer and K. A. Tuzinski (Eds.), Simulations for personnel selection. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaTorre, J. & Bucklan, M. A. (2013). Simulations for service roles. In M. S. Fetzer and K. A. Tuzinski (Eds.), Simulations for personnel selection. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucci, S., & Kopec, D. (2012). Artificial intelligence in the 21 st century. VA: Mercury Learning and Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1966). The psychology of science. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, M., Lawrence, A., & Kinney, T. (2013). Show me you can do it: The use of interactive simulations in manufacturing settings. In M. S. Fetzer & K. A. Tuzinski (Eds.), Simulations for personnel selection. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shute, V. J., & Ke, F. (2012). Games, learning, and assessment. In D. Ifenthaler, D. Eseryel, & X. Ge (Eds.). Assessment in game-based learning: Foundations, innovations, and perspectives. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydell, E., Ferrell, J., Carpenter, J., Frost, C., & Brodbeck, C. C. (2013). Simulation scoring. In M. S. Fetzer & K. A. Tuzinski (Eds.), Simulations for personnel selection. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernimont, P. F.,& Campbell, J. P. (1968). Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 372–276.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Fetzer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fetzer, M. (2013). Future Directions. In: Fetzer, M., Tuzinski, K. (eds) Simulations for Personnel Selection. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7681-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics