Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: Quality and Performance in Cancer Intervention
Image guidance has become a central element of radiation therapy. While the use of images begins at the planning phase, recent technological developments allow high-performance imaging at the treatment unit on a fraction-by-fraction basis, and thereby, allow errors in the targeting of the radiation to be detected and corrected. This development enables a reduction in the volume of normal tissues that must be exposed to therapeutic levels of radiation to assure target coverage. The tightening of the planning target volume (PTV) margins also permits dose escalation for clinical sites where local control is lacking. In addition to enabling novel treatments, IGRT technologies are also seen to increase the quality with which radiation therapy is executed. While the development of the imaging systems is a critical component of IGRT, there have also needed to be developments in the lexicon of radiation therapy prescription, image registration tools, and robotic technologies for patient repositioning to allow the IGRT paradigm to operate within the existing operational models of fractionated radiation therapy. Overall, the technological developments over the past 10 years have transformed radiation therapy into a leading model of image guidance in cancer intervention embarking on the exciting field of adaptive therapy, wherein, geometric and biological changes occurring during the course of therapy are accommodated through replanning.
KeywordsToxicity Fractionation Assure Tray
The author would like to acknowledge individuals that have collaborated on some of the work reported in this chapter. These include Dr. Mike Milosevic, Mr. James Stewart, Dr. Kristy Brock, and Dr. Tim Craig. Drs. G. Fallone, J. Lagendijk, and J. Dempsey are thanked for providing some of the figures included in this paper. IMRIS, Inc. is acknowledged for providing the rendering of the MRgRT solution being developed for the Princess Margaret Hospital.
- 2.del Regato JA. One hundred years of radiation oncology, Current radiation oncology, vol. 2. New York: Arnold and Oxford University Press, Inc.; 1996.Google Scholar
- 6.Jaffray A, et al. Radiation oncology. In: Peters TM, Cleary K, editors. Image-guided interventions: technology and applications. New York: Springer; 2008.Google Scholar
- 7.ICRU50. ICRU report 50: prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy. Bethesda: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements; 1993.Google Scholar
- 8.ICRU62. ICRU report 62: prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy (supplement to ICRU report 50). Bethesda: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements; 1999.Google Scholar
- 10.Yan D, Lockman D, Brabbins D, Tyburski L, Martinez A. An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer. Med Phys. 1997;38:197.Google Scholar
- 51.Jaffray D, Carlone M, Menard C, Breen S. Image-guided radiation therapy: emergence of MR-Guided Radiation Treatment (MRgRT) systems. Paper presented at: Society of PhotoOptical Instrumentation and Engineering, San Diego. 2010.Google Scholar
- 55.ASRT. Radiation therapy, management and dosimetry workplace survey: American Society of Radiologic Technologists. 2010.Google Scholar
- 57.Heemsbergen WD, Hoogeman MS, Witte MG, Peeters ST, Incrocci L, Lebesque JV. Increased risk of biochemical and clinical failure for prostate patients with a large rectum at radiotherapy planning: results from the Dutch trial of 68 GY versus 78 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67(5):1418–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 63.Onishi H, Kuriyama K, Komiyama T, et al. Clinical outcomes of stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer using a novel irradiation technique: patient self-controlled breath-hold and beam switching using a combination of linear accelerator and CT scanner. Lung Cancer. 2004;45(1):45–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar