The Affine-Scaling Method

  • Robert J. Vanderbei
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 196)

Abstract

In the previous chapter, we showed that the step direction for the path-following method can be decomposed into a linear combination of three directions: a direction toward optimality, a direction toward feasibility, and a direction toward centrality. It turns out that these directions, or minor variants of them, arise in all interior-point methods.

Bibliography

  1. Barnes, E. (1986). A variation on Karmarkar’s algorithm for solving linear programming problems. Mathematical Programming, 36, 174–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dikin, I. (1967). Iterative solution of problems of linear and quadratic programming. Soviet Mathematics Doklady, 8, 674–675.Google Scholar
  3. Dikin, I. (1974). On the speed of an iterative process. Upravlyaemye Sistemi, 12, 54–60.Google Scholar
  4. Hall, L., and Vanderbei, R. (1993). Two-thirds is sharp for affine scaling. OR Letters, 13, 197–201.Google Scholar
  5. Karmarkar, N. (1984). A new polynomial time algorithm for linear programming. Combinatorica, 4, 373–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mascarenhas, W. (1997). The affine scaling algorithm fails for λ = 0. 999. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 7, 34–46.Google Scholar
  7. Saigal, R. (1995). Linear programming. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Tsuchiya, T., and Muramatsu, M. (1992). Global convergence of a long-step affine scaling algorithm for degenerate linear programming problems. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 5(3), 525–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Vanderbei, R. (1989). Affine scaling for linear programs with free variables. Mathematical Programming, 43, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Vanderbei, R., Meketon, M., and Freedman, B. (1986). A modification of Karmarkar’s linear programming algorithm. Algorithmica, 1, 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. Vanderbei
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Operations Research and Financial EngineeringPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations