Skip to main content

Reducing Global Warming by Process Integration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Causes, Impacts and Solutions to Global Warming

Abstract

In an attempt to contribute to the reduction of global warming, the integration of both reaction and separation in a single unit to bring about an improvement in the energy efficiency of the overall process is studied in this chapter. The esterification reaction between acetic acid and ethanol for the production of ethyl acetate (desired product) and water (by-product) is used as the case study. In order to demonstrate the role of the integrated process in global warming reduction, both the conventional system and the integrated one are studied. The conventional system is made up of a reactor (in which the chemical reaction takes place) and a distillation column (in which the desired product is purified) whereas the integrated system consists of a single unit having a single main column divided into three sections (rectification section, reaction section, and stripping section). Comparing the two systems, the results that are obtained from the studies reveal that, for the integrated system, the heat released to the atmosphere from the condenser (that is, the condenser duty) and the one supplied to the reboiler (the reboiler duty) are less than those of the conventional system. These results have actually shown the importance of process integration in reducing global warming and increasing process efficiency. It is therefore suggested to the industrial engineers to always integrate their processes, where possible, in order to contribute their quotas in reducing global warming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Cp :

Specific heat capacity, J/(kmol K)

kb :

Backward reaction rate constant

kf :

Forward reaction rate constant

m:

Total number of components

M′:

Molar flow rate, kmol/h

mw:

Molecular weight, kg/kmol

Q:

Heat transfer rate, J/h

Qcond :

Heat transfer rate from the condenser, kJ/h

Qreb :

Heat transfer rate to the reboiler, kJ/h

Qreleased :

Total heat transfer rate to the surroundings, kJ/h

Qrxn :

Heat transfer rate from the reactor/reaction section, kJ/h

T:

Temperature, °C

Ttop :

Product temperature, °C

V:

Volumetric flow rate, cm3/h

x:

Liquid mole fraction

ρ:

Density, kg/m3

α:

Volatility

av:

Average

i:

Component number

References

  1. Goyal RK (2004) Sensitivity of evapotranspiration to global warming: a case study of arid zone of Rajasthan (India). Agric Water Manage 69:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Radhi H (2009) Evaluating the potential impact of global warming on the UAE residential buildings—a contribution to reduce the CO2 emissions. Build Environ 44:2451–2462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deming D (1995) Climatic warming in North America: analysis of borehole temperatures. Science 268:1576–1577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris RN, Chapman DS (1997) Borehole temperatures and a baseline for 20th century global warming estimates. Science 275:1618–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nordell B (2003) Thermal pollution causes global warming. Global Planet Change 38:305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nordell B, Gervet B (2009) Global energy accumulation and net heat emission. Int J Global Warming 1:373–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kharseh M, Altorkmany L, Nordell B (2011) Global warming’s impact on the performance of GSHP. Renew Energy 36:1485–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Durmayaz A, Kadioglu M, Sen Z (2000) An application of the degree-hours method to estimate the residential heating energy requirement and fuel consumption in Istanbul. Energy 25:1245–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Klemes J, Friedler F, Bulatov I, Varbanov P (2010) Sustainability in the process industry: integration and optimization (green manufacturing & systems engineering). McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  10. Patel J, Uygun K, Huang Y (2008) A path constrained method for integration of process design and control. Comp Chem Eng 32:1373–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jantharasuk A, Gani R, Górakc A, Assabumrungrat S (2011) Methodology for design and analysis of reactive distillation involving multielement systems. Chem Eng Res Design 8:1295–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh BP, Singh R, Kumar MVP, Kaistha N (2005) Steady state analysis of reactive distillation using homotopy continuation. Chem Eng Res Design 83:959–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Almeida-Rivera CP, Swinkels PLJ, Grievink J (2004) Designing reactive distillation processes: present and future. Comp Chem Eng 28:1997–2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alexiadis A (2007) Global warming and human activity: a model for studying the potential instability of the carbon dioxide/temperature feedback mechanism. Ecol Model 203:243–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zevenhoven R, Beyene A (2011) The relative contribution of waste heat from power plants to global warming. Energy 36:3754–3762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dunn RF, Bush GE (2001) Using process integration technology for CLEANER production. J Cleaner Prod 9:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Friedler F (2010) Process integration, modelling and optimisation for energy saving and pollution reduction. Appl Thermal Eng 30:2270–2280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Morar M, Agachi PS (2010) Review: Important contributions in development and improvement of the heat integration techniques. Comput Chem Eng 34:1171–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aspen T (2003) HYSYS v3.2 (Build 5029). Aspen Technology, Inc. United States

    Google Scholar 

  20. Giwa A, Karacan S (2012) Modeling and simulation of a reactive packed distillation column using delayed neural networks. Chaotic Model Simul 1:101–108

    Google Scholar 

  21. Giwa A, Karacan S (2012) Simulation and optimization of ethyl acetate reactive packed distillation process using Aspen Hysys. J Sci Technol 2(2):57–63

    Google Scholar 

  22. Giwa A, Karacan S (2012) Black-Box modelling of ethyl acetate reactive packed distillation column. AU J Technol 15(3):172–178

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liley PE, Thomson GH, Friend DG, Daubert TE, Buck E (1999) Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Abdulwahab Giwa wishes to acknowledge the support received from the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu—TÜBİTAK) for his PhD program. In addition, this research is supported by the Scientific Research Project Office of Ankara University (A. Ü. BAP) under the Project No. 09B4343007.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulwahab Giwa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A

Appendix A

1.1 Calculation of Average Molecular Weight

The average molecular weight of the components is calculated using Eq. (39.A1) shown below:

$$ m{w_{av }}=\sum\limits_{i=1}^m {\left( {{x_i}m{w_i}} \right)} $$
(39.A1)

1.2 Calculation of Average Density

The average density of the components is calculated with the expression shown in Eq. (39.A2) below:

$$ {\rho_{av }}=\sum\limits_{i=1}^m {\left( {\frac{{{x_i}m{w_i}{\rho_i}}}{{m{w_{av }}}}} \right)} $$
(39.A2)

1.3 Calculation of Molar Flow Rate

The molar flow rate of the mixture is calculated using Eq. (39.A3) shown below:

$$ {M}^{\prime}=\frac{{V{\rho_{av }}}}{{m{w_{av }}}} $$
(39.A3)

1.4 Calculation of Heat Transfer Rate

The heat capacity contained in the heat transfer rate equation (Eq. 39.A5) is estimated with the expression given in Eq. (39.A4) while the heat flow rate itself is obtained using Eq. (39.A5):

$$ {C_p}=a+bT+c{T^2}+d{T^3}+e{T^4} $$
(39.A4)
$$ Q={M}^{\prime}\int\nolimits_{{{T_{initial}}}}^{{{T_{final }}}} {{C_p}dT} $$
(39.A5)

The coefficients used for calculating the specific heat capacities are as shown in Table 39.A1 below.

Table 39.A1 Specific heat capacity coefficients of the components [23]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giwa, A., Karacan, S. (2013). Reducing Global Warming by Process Integration. In: Dincer, I., Colpan, C., Kadioglu, F. (eds) Causes, Impacts and Solutions to Global Warming. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7588-0_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7588-0_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7587-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7588-0

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics