Advertisement

Utilizing Bamboo Biochar for Carbon Sequestration and Local Economic Development

  • Michael HallEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explains the diverse benefits, the long-term stability, and the economic efficiency of using bamboo biochar as a means to sequester carbon while improving the local environment and economy. It involves Master’s students from the Department of Design Strategy at Kyushu University, Undergraduate and Graduate students from the Department of Agriculture at Kyushu University, local volunteer Satoyama members, and support from the Japan Biochar Association. In this initial stage of the project, the students conducted a survey of people living in Fukuoka, Japan, to determine their general knowledge about the environment and the carbon credit scheme, and their interest in buying pesticide-free vegetables in order to determine if environmental education and promotion are necessary for the success of the project’s goal of using biochar as a means for carbon sequestration and marketing strategy for vegetables. Results showed that there is no knowledge about the carbon credit scheme, only some general environmental awareness, and modest interest in buying pesticide-free biochar grown vegetables if more expensive than the ones grown under normal conditions. Therefore, the next step will be to develop effective materials, carry out events to educate and promote the positive impacts of the system, and develop production methods that maintain a competitive price to widely used pesticides.

Keywords

Bamboo biochar Carbon sequestration Project-based learning 

Acronyms

CCS

Carbon capture and storage

CEC

Cation exchange capacity

EC

Electric current (in soil)

MLITT

Ministry of land, infrastructure, transport, and tourism

NGO

Nongovernment organization

NPO

Nonprofit organization

PETM

Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum

PDCA

Plan, do, check, act

SWOT

Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats

References

  1. 1.
    Campbell-Lendrum D, Woodruff R (2007) Climate change: quantifying the health impact at national and local levels. In: Prüss-Üstün A, Corvalán C (eds) World Health Organization, Geneva. WHO Environmental Burden of Disease Series No. 14. Annex, p 59Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cui Y, Kump L, Ridgewell A, Charles A, Junium C, Diefendorf A, Freeman K, Urban N, Harding I (2011) Slow release of fossil carbon during the palaeocene-eocene thermal maximum. Nat Geosci. 4(7):481–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang DZ, Brecke P, Lee H, He Y, Zhang J (2007) Global climate change, war, and population decline in recent human history. PNAS 104(49):19214–19219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Furuya J, Kobayashi S, Meyer S (2011) Economic impacts of climate change on global food supply and demand. In: Lal R et al (eds) Climate change and food security in South Asia, Springer, Netherlands, p 377–394Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson D, Welch M, Robinson J (2012) Texas’s driest year on record. Choices and the agriculture and applied economics association, 3rd Quarter 27(3):1–3Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    International Energy Agency (2012) In: World Energy Outlook, p 3Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miyazaki Y (1697) Nogyozensho (Encyclopedia of Agriculture) Vol. 1 in Nihon Nousho Zenshu, vol 12. Nousangyoson Bunka Kyokai, Tokyo, pp 91–104Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lehmann J, Pereira J, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological anthrosol and ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wayne E (2012) Conquistadors, cannibals and climate change: a brief history of biochar. Pro-Natura International. http://www.pronatura.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/History-of-biochar.pdf
  10. 10.
    McLauglin H (2010) What is biochar? In: Taylor P (ed) The Biochar Revolution. Global Publishing Group, Australia, p 67Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Laird D, Fleming P, Davis D, Horton R, Wang B, Karlen D (2010) Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agriculture soil. Geoderma 158:443–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baranick M, McElwee D, Zazycki M (2011) Biochar feasibility study: exploring the environmental, social, and economic value of a biochar business in the Methow Valley. Seattle University, Seattle, p 7Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bell MJ, Worrall F (2011) Charcoal addition to soils in NE England: a carbon sink with environmental co-benefits. Sci Total Environ 409:1704–1714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: an Introduction. Biochar for environmental management. Science and technology. Earthscan Publishers Ltd., London, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pacala S, Socolow R (2004) Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305:968–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    International Biochar Initiative (2011) How much carbon can biochar systems offset—and when? http://www.biochar-international.org
  17. 17.
    Hayashi R (1990) Effects of purified wood vinegar as soil amendment and leaf surface spray. In: Sugiura G et al (eds) The research report on the new uses of wood charcoal and wood vinegar, Technical Research Association for Multiuse of Carbonized Materials, Tokyo p 331–341Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McGreevy S, Shibata A (2010) A Rural Revitalization Scheme in Japan utilizing biochar and eco-branding: the carbon minus project, Kameoka City. Ann Environ Sci 4:11–22Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Japanese Timber Bamboo—Phyllostachys bambusoides. Complete Bamboo http://www.completebamboo.com
  20. 20.
    Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Harris K, Das KC, Bibens B (2008) Effect of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. Trans ASABE 51:2061–2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Itoshima City web site http://www.city.itoshima.lg.jp/site/prof/jinkou20110727.html. Accessed 20 Mar 2012
  22. 22.
    Brown T, Wright M, Brown R (2011) Estimating the profitability of two biochar production scenarios: slow pyrolysis vs. fast pyrolysis. Biofuels Bioproducts Biorefining 5:54–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baranick M, McElwee D, Zazycki M (2011) Biochar feasibility study: exploring the environmental, social and economic value of a biochar business in the Methow Valley. Seattle University, Seattle, pp 1–30Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lemer R (2011) The sweet potato. Department of Horticulture. Purdue University Extension Service, West Lafayette, IndianaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations