Advertisement

A Triple-Helix Model of Sustainable Government Information Infrastructure: Case Study of the eProcurement System in the Indonesian Public Sector

Conference paper

Abstract

Lack of sustainability is one of the problems in information system (IS) implementation in developing countries, such as Indonesia. More specifically, this is the case in eGovernment implementation. Using an interpretive research stance in a case study of the eProcurement system in the public sector, the study reveals that the concept of information infrastructure (II) can be used to understand the sustainability issue. Findings suggest that applying the concept of II in IS development and implementation can improve the sustainability of an IS in the public sector, especially one that is used across government agencies and levels. The paper proposes a triple-helix model of a government II composed of legal, managerial, and technical factors and recommends that these factors should be taken into account in an orchestrated fashion.

Keywords

Local Government Government Agency Public Procurement Information Infrastructure Legal Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Sein MK (2011) The “I” between G and C: e-Government intermediaries in developing countries. Electron J Inform Syst Dev Countries 48:1–14Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walsham G, Sahay S (2006) Research on information systems in developing countries: current landscape and future prospects. Inform Technol Dev 12:17–24Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braa J, Hanseth O, Heywood A, Mohammed W, Shaw V (2007) Developing health information systems in developing countries: the flexible standards strategy. MIS Quarterly 31:381–402Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heeks R (2002) Information systems and developing countries: failure, success and local improvisations. Inform Soc 18:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heeks R (2002) E-government in Africa: promise and practice. Inform Polity 7:97–114Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    (2012) Lembaga Kebijakan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah: e-Procurement implementation progress 2008–2012Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Research commentary: desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform Syst Res 12:121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bygstad B (2008) Information infrastructures as organization: a critical realist view. The 29th international conference of information systems (ICIS), Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anonymous (2009) Corruption ingrained in procurement processes. The Jakarta PostGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Transparency International (2008) Handbook for curbing corruption in public procurement. Transparency International, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maruster L, Faber NR, Peters K (2008) Sustainable information systems: a knowledge perspective. J Syst Inform Technol 10:218–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jacucci E, Shaw V, Braa J (2006) Standardization of health information systems in South Africa: the challenge of local sustainability. Inform Technol Dev 12:225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kumar R, Best ML (2006) Impact and sustainability of e-government services in developing countries: lessons learned from Tamil Nadu, India. Inform Soc 22:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Furuholt B (2009) Bridging the digital divide: sustainable supply and demand of internet access in developing countries. PhD thesis. Aalborg University, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Star SL, Ruhleder K (1996) Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Inform Syst Res 7:111–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hanseth O, Lyytinen K (2010) Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet. J Inform Technol 25:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Star SL (2010) This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci Technol Hum Values 35:601–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Benbasat I, Goldstein DK, Mead M (1987) The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly 11:369–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hanseth O (2002) From systems and tools to networks and infrastructures. Toward a theory of ICT solutions and its design methodology implicationsGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rolland KH (2000) Challenging the installed base: deploying a large-scale IS in a global organization. In: Hansen HR, Bichler M, Mahrer H (eds) Proceedings of the 8th European conference of information systems, pp 583–590Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Furuholt B, Wahid F (2008) E-government challenges and the role of political leadership in Indonesia: the case of Sragen. In: Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) 2008Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Friedrich WR, van der Poll JA (2007) Towards a methodology to elicit tacit domain knowledge from users. Interdiscipl J Inform Knowl Manag 2:180–193Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Walker HA (2004) Beyond power and domination: legitimacy and formal organizations. In: Johnson C (ed) Research in the sociology of organizations, vol 22. Elsevier, Oxford, UK, pp 239–271Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Braa J, Monteiro E, Sahay S (2004) Networks of action: sustainable health information systems across developing countries. MIS Quarterly 28:337–362Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of AgderKristiansandNorway
  2. 2.Department of InformaticsUniversitas Islam IndonesiaYogyakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations