Skip to main content

Towards Improving Information Systems Interoperability in Disaster Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Building Sustainable Information Systems

Abstract

Climate change-triggered catastrophic events appear to be steadily increasing in intensity and frequency. Proper preparation, response and recovery are essential in order to survive and recover from disasters. However, for historical, geographical and cultural reasons, the organisations responsible for delivering emergency response services often underperform, with the lack of proper interoperation and collaboration of their information systems being a main culprit. This paper analyses interoperability issues specific to disaster management from an information systems perspective and proposes improvements based on advances in information systems and interoperability research, using an enterprise architecture perspective in order to provide a sustainable holistic and life cycle-based solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1):37–51

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blackburn WR (2007) The sustainability handbook. EarthScan Publishers, Cornwall, UK

    Google Scholar 

  3. UN World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future (Brundtland Report). Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Noran O (2011) Integrating environmental and information systems management: an enterprise architecture approach, in information systems development: Asian experiences. In: Song W et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 18th international conference on information systems development (ISD 2009), Springer, Nanchang, China, pp 123–134

    Google Scholar 

  5. Whitman L, Panetto H (2006) The missing link: culture and language barriers to interoperability. Annu Rev Contr 30(2):233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lehtinen E, Lyytinen K (1986) Action based model of information system. Inform Syst Res 11(4):299–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Government of South Australia (2004) Emergency Management Act 2004. http://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/LZ/C/A/EMERGENCYMANAGEMENTACT2004.aspx. Accessed 30 Mar 2011

  8. Australian Government (2011) Attorney’s General’s Office—Emergency Management in Australia. http://www.ema.gov.au/. Accessed 30 Mar 2011

  9. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2011) National response framework. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/about_nrf.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2011

  10. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction Secretariat (UNISDR) (2011) Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015: building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/1037_hyogoframeworkforactionenglish.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2011

  11. Queensland Floods Commission of Enquiry (2011) Submissions to the enquiry. http://www.floodcommission.qld.gov.au/submissions/. Accessed Jul 2011

  12. Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission (2009) Submissions to the enquiry. http://www.royalcommission.vic.gov.au/Submissions/View-Submissions. Accessed Jul 2011

  13. OASIS (2005) Common Alerting Protocol v1.1. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/15135/emergency-CAPv1.1-Corrected_DOM.pdf. Accessed 2012

  14. Clark JL (2006) Practical aspects of federalizing disaster response. Crit Care 10:107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wiese CR (2006) Organizing Homeland Security after Katrina: is adaptive management what’s missing? Publ Admin Rev 66(3):302–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hart P et al (2005) The politics of crisis management: public leadership under pressure. J Homeland Security Emerg Manag. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  17. von Lubitz DKJE, Beakley JE, Patricelli F (2008) Disaster management: the structure, function, and significance of network-centric operations. J Homeland Security Emerg Manag 5(1):Art. 42

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brewin B (2011) Tsunami response reveals poor radio interoperability. http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20110415_3972.php. Accessed Apr 2012

  19. Igarashi Y et al (2011) Anatomy of historical tsunamis: lessons learned for tsunami warning. Pure Appl Geophys 168:2043–2063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wickramasinghe N, von Lubitz DKJE (2007) Knowledge based enterprises: theories and fundamentals. J Homeland Security Emerg Manag. Vol. 5. IGP Publishing Group, Hershey PA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prizzia R, Helfand G (2001) Emergency preparedness and disaster management in Hawaii. Disast Prev Manag 10(3):163–172

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kapucu N, Arslan T, Demiroz F (2010) Collaborative emergency management and national emergency management network. Disast Prev Manag 19(4):452–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Trakas A (2012) Interoperability—a key requirement for emergency and disaster management. http://www.un-spider.org/book/5143/4c-challenge-communication-coordination-cooperation-capacity-development. Accessed 2012

  24. Stohr E, Konsynsky BR (1992) Information systems and decision processes. IEEE Computer Society Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  25. Camarinha-Matos L et al (2009) Collaborative networked organizations—concepts and practice in manufacturing enterprises. Comput Ind Eng 57(1):46–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. NATO (2006) Interoperability for joint operations. http://www.nato.int/docu/interoperability/interoperability.pdf. Accessed Jul 2011

  27. Heart F et al (1978) In: Bolt, Beranek, Newman (eds) ARPANET Completion Report. Burlington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  28. ISO (2005) ISO14258 Industrial automation systems—concepts and rules for enterprise models

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chen D (2006) Framework for enterprise interoperability. http://www.fines-cluster.eu/fines/jm/Download-document/53-Framework-for-Enterprise-Interoperability-Chen.html. Accessed Jul 2011

  30. Ellis S, Kanowski P, Whelan R (2004) National inquiry into bushfire mitigation and management. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  31. Esmond J (2011) Report on the attraction, support and retention of emergency management volunteers. http://www.ema.gov.au/www/emaweb/emaweb.nsf/Page/Volunteers2. Accessed 30 Mar 2011

  32. McLennan J (2008) Issues facing Australian volunteer-based emergency services organisations: 2008–2010. http://www.ema.gov.au/www/emaweb/emaweb.nsf/Page/Volunteers2. Accessed 30 Mar 2011

  33. Queensland Government (2011) Queensland combined emergency services academy (QCESA). http://www.safecom.sa.gov.au/site/emergency_management.jsp. Accessed 30 Mar 2011

  34. Gartner Research (2012) IT glossary. http://www.gartner.com/technology/it-glossary/enterprise-architecture.jsp. Accessed 2012

  35. Pava C (1983) Managing new office technology, an organisational strategy. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Keen PGW, Scott Morton M (1978) Decision support systems: an organisational perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  37. Iivari J (1991) A paradigmatic analysis of contemporary schools of IS development. Eur J Inform Syst 1(4):249–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. McGregor D (1960) The human side of enterprise. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. ISO/IEC (2005) Annex C: GERAM, in ISO/IS 15704:2000/Amd1:2005: industrial automation systems—requirements for enterprise-reference architectures and methodologies

    Google Scholar 

  40. Noran O (2008) A meta-methodology for collaborative networked organisations: creating directly applicable methods for enterprise engineering projects. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, Saarbrücken

    Google Scholar 

  41. Noran O (2009) In: Doucet G, Gotze J, Saha P (eds) Engineering the sustainable business: an enterprise architecture approach, in coherency management: architecting the enterprise for alignment, agility, and assurance. International Enterprise Architecture Institute. pp 179–210

    Google Scholar 

  42. Government of Queensland (2012) Department of community safety—structure. http://www.emergency.qld.gov.au/about/. Accessed Apr 2012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ovidiu Noran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Noran, O. (2013). Towards Improving Information Systems Interoperability in Disaster Management. In: Linger, H., Fisher, J., Barnden, A., Barry, C., Lang, M., Schneider, C. (eds) Building Sustainable Information Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7540-8_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7540-8_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7539-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7540-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics