IS Degrees: Sociotechnical or Technosocial? A Reflective Analysis

Conference paper

Abstract

This paper describes a reflective and empirical investigation by staff involved in delivery of the Heriot-Watt University Information Systems undergraduate degree. It looks particularly at the practical relevance of the IS 2010 model curriculum, asking to what extent the Heriot-Watt University Information Systems teaching staff supports the model and identifying areas of conflicting opinion. These are compared with empirical evidence of relevance to employability in the form of statistics on graduate destinations from cohorts in 2010 and 2011. An IS virtual alumni forum was set up for past students to debate the IS degree and discuss areas of relevance to careers and suggestions for further improvement. In agreement with the IS 2010 model, graduate discussion and working panel reflection both propose the inclusion of a project management course. Graduates also suggest the need for more specialised technical skills in software and web development and a stronger grounding in spreadsheet application software including statistical processing methods. In agreement with the working panel, graduates state the importance of having quality experienced teaching delivered with skill and enthusiasm. Further work is then proposed to encourage continuous reflective practice and enhance student experience.

References

  1. 1.
    Abraham T, Beath C, Bullen C, Gallagher K, Goles T, Kaiser K, Simon J (2006) IT workforce trends: implications for IS programmes. Commun Assoc Inform Syst 17:1147–1170Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrie SC (2007) A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of graduate attributes. Stud Higher Educ 32(4):439–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brennan J, Johnstone B, Little B, Shah T, Woodley A (2001) The employment of UK graduates: comparisons with Europe and Japan. The Higher Education Funding Council for England, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brickman- Bhutta C (2009) Not by the book, facebook as a sampling framework. http://www.thearda.com/workingpapers/download/Not%20by%20the%20Book%20-%20Bhutta.doc.-last. Accessed May 5 2012
  5. 5.
    Carlsson S, Hedman J, Steen O (2007) Model curriculum for a bachelor of science programme in business information systems design: organisational impacts. In the proceedings of the 16th international conference on information systems development (ISD2007), NUI Galway, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coady J, Jeyaseelan J (2004) Employability: theory & practice proceedings of the learning and teaching conference, Heriot-Watt University, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coady J, Pooley R (2008) IS degrees—sociotechnical or technosocial? In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on information systems development, Paphos, Cyprus, Springer LNCSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Education Ministers European Joint declaration of the European Ministers of Education convened in Bologna on the 19th of June 1999Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gorgone J, Gordon Davis J, Cougar D, Feinstein DL, Herbert E (1997) Model undergraduate curriculum guidelines for IS programs. SIGCSE Bull Inroads 29(4):209–213Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gorgone J, Davis G, Valcich JS, Topi H, Feinstein D, Longenecker H, Jr. (2002) IS 2002 model curriculum and guidelines for undergraduate degree programmes in information systems, Association for Computing Machinery, Association for Information Systems, Association for Information Technology ProfessionalsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gupta JND, Wachter RM (1998) A Capstone course in the information systems curriculum. Int J Inform Manage 18(6):427–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harvey L, Moon S, Geall V, Bower R (1997). Graduates work: organisation change and students entrepreneuring in education ERIC. Institute for Education Sciences, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hawkins P, Winter J (1998) Mastering change. Department for Education and Employment, Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Landry J, Longenecker H, Haigood B, Feinstein D (2000) Comparing entry-level skill depths across information systems job types: perceptions of is faculty. In: Proceedings of sixth Americas conference on information systems, Long Beach, CAGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lowry G, Turner R (2005). Information Systems Education for the 21st Century: Aligning Curriculum Content and Delivery with Professional Workplace. In Carbonara, D. (Ed)Technology Literacy Applications in Learning Environments, Information Science Publishing, Hershey PA, pp171–202Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lynch K, Fisher J (2005) Tomorrows workforce today: what is required by information systems graduates to work in a collaborative information systems workplace. Book Chapter XV in Information Systems and Technology Education: From University to the Workplace. IGI Global pp 311–326 ISBN-10: 1599041146Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McInnes A (2010). Soft model of the information systems degree. Undergraduate degree thesis, HeriotWatt Library, p 26Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Redmond F (2010) Social networking sites: evaluating and investigating their use in academic research. Dissertation, Dublin Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Snoke R, Underwood A, Bruce C (2002). An Australian view of generic attributes coverage in undergraduate programmes of study: an information systems case study. In: Proceedings of HERDSA 2002, 590–598Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stapleton L (2001) From Information Systems in Social Settings To Information Systems as Social Settings: A Study of Large Information Systems in Manufacturing Firms, IFAC Symposium on Automation Based on Human Skill: Joint Design of Technology and Organisation, Elsevier: North HollandGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stapleton L, Murphy C (2002) Examining non-representation in engineering notations: empirical evidence for the ontological incompleteness of the functionally-rational modelling paradigm. In: Proceedings of the IFAC world congress 2002, Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stefanidis A, Fitzgerald G (2010) Information systems curricula in the UK: a survey of undergraduate courses. Italics 9(1):9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Toleman M, Roberts D, Ryan C (2004) retrofitting generic graduate attributes: a case-study of IS undergraduate programmes, informing science + information technology education joint conference—InSITE 2004, 625–635 (Rockhampton, 25–28 June)
  24. 24.
    Turner R, Lowry G (2003) Education for a technology-based profession: softening the information systems curriculum. Book Chapter XIII) in Issues in Information Systems Education. Tanya McGill, editor. Hershey, USA: IRMA Press. pp 153-172. ISBN 1-931777-53-5Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Von Hellens L, Wong S, Orr J (2000). IT skills requirements: perspective from industry. In: Proceedings 11th Australasian conference on information systems: ACIS 2000. ACIS, Brisbane (ACIS2000 Proceedings, CD-ROM)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Walters SA, Broady JE, Hartley RJ (1994) A review of information systems development methodologies. Library Manage 15(6):5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computing ScienceHeriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations