From Collective Victimhood to Social Reconciliation: Outlining a Conceptual Framework

Chapter
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS, volume 17)

Abstract

In this introductory chapter, the authors review existing work and propose a general conceptual framework to understand the development of collective memories and narratives related to experiences of victimisation in the former Yugoslavia since the early 1990s. They address the following issues. What specific beliefs about collective victimisation and collective guilt are developing across different communities? What are their psychological, social and political functions? Are collective memories largely shared within and disputed between ethno-national groups, or are there other important social divides that structure remembrance of the conflict? To what extent are these systems of beliefs obstacles for reconciliation, social reconstruction and prevention of future cycles of violence? What elements might, on the contrary, facilitate the development of empathy across group boundaries or the acknowledgement of common values and norms? What policies are likely to make a difference in directing collective memories and narratives in the sense of either an ethos of conflict or an ethos of peace? The chapter presents the state of the art of research in this area and provides a conceptual grid to locate the relevance of the empirical contributions presented in the subsequent chapters of this section.

Keywords

Former Yugoslavia War Victim Social reconstruction Collective memory 

References

  1. Andrews, M. (2007). Shaping history: Narrative of political change. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anzulovic, B. (1999). Heavenly Serbia: From myth to genocide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, P. (1999). The Anglo-Irish peace process: Obstacles to reconciliation. In R. L. Rothstein (Ed.), After the peace: Resistance and reconciliation (pp. 85–109). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114.Google Scholar
  5. Asmal, K., Asmal, L., & Roberts, R. S. (1997). Reconciliation through truth: A reckoning of apartheid’s criminal governance. Capetown: David Phillips Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Auerbach, Y. (2004). The role of forgiveness in reconciliation. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov, (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 149–176). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bar-Tal, D. (2000). From intractable conflict through conflict resolution to reconciliation: Psychological analysis. Political Psychology, 21, 351–365.Google Scholar
  9. Bar-Tal, D. (2003). Collective memory of physical violence: Its contribution to the culture of violence. In E. Cairns & M. D. Roe (Eds.), The role of memory in ethnic conflict (pp. 77–93). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1430–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bar-Tal, D. (2009). Reconciliation as a foundation of culture of peace. In J. de Rivera (Ed.), Handbook on building cultures for peace (pp. 363–377). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bar-Tal, D. (2013). Intractable conflicts: Socio-psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bar-Tal, D., & Bennink, G. H. (2004) The nature of reconciliation as an outcome and as a process. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 11–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bar-Tal, D., Chernyak-Hai, L., Schori, N., & Gundar, A. (2009). A sense of self-perceived collective victimhood in intractable conflicts. International Red Cross Review, 91, 229–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bar-Tal, D., & Hammack, P. L. (2012). Conflict, delegitimization and violence In L. R. Tropp (Ed.), Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bennett, C. (1994). Yugoslavia’s bloody collapse: Causes, course and consequences. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
  17. Bloomfield, D., Barnes, T., & Huyse, L. (Eds.) (2003).Reconciliation after violent conflict: A handbook. Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
  18. Bronkhorst, D. (1995). Truth and reconciliation: Obstacles and opportunities for human rights. Amsterdam: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
  19. Calic, M. J. (2009). Ethnic cleansing and war crimes. In C. Ingrao & T. A. Emmert (Eds.), Confronting the Yugoslav controversies (pp. 115–151). Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Cehajic, S., & Brown, R. (2008). Not in my name: A social psychological study of antecedents and consequences of acknowledgement of in-group atrocities. Genocide Studies and Prevention (a special issue on the Aftermath of Genocide), 3(2), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cehajic, S., & Brown, R. (2010). Silencing the past: effect of intergroup contact on acknowledgement of ingroup atrocities. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(2), 190–196.Google Scholar
  22. Cehajic, S., Brown, R., & Castano, E. (2008). Forgive and forget? Antecedents and consequences of intergroup forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Political Psychology, 29, 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cehajic, S., Effron, D., Halperin, E., Liberman, V., & Ross, L. (2011). Affirmation, acknowledgement of ingroup responsibility, group-based guilt, and support for reparative measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 256–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chirwa, W. (1997). Collective memory and the process of reconciliation and reconstruction. Development in Practice, 7, 479–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cohen, R. (1979). Threat perception in international crisis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  26. Cohen, S. (2001). States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. David, O., & Bar-Tal, D. (2009). A socio-psychological conception of collective identity: The case of national identity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 354–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Elcheroth, G., & Spini, D. (2011). Political violence, intergroup conflict, and ethnic categories. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 175–194). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gagnon, V. P., Jr., (2004). The myth of ethnic war: Serbia and Croatia in the 1990s. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gardner Feldman, L. (1999). The principle and practice of ‘reconciliation’ in German foreign policy: Relations with France, Israel, Poland and the Czech Republic. International Affairs, 75, 333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glenny, M. (1993). The fall of Yugoslavia: The third Balkan War. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  32. Gow, J. (2003). The Serbian project and its adversaries: A strategy of war crimes. London: Hurst & Co.Google Scholar
  33. Hayes, G. (1998). We suffer our memories: Thinking about the past, healing, and reconciliation. American Imago, 55, 29–50.Google Scholar
  34. Hayner, P. B. (1999). In pursuit of justice and reconciliation: Contributions of truth telling. In C. J. Arnson (Ed.), Comparative peace processes in Latin America (pp. 363–383). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kaplan, R. (1994). Balkan ghosts: A journey through the history. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  36. Klandermans, B. (1988). The formation and mobilization of consensus. In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), From structure to action: Comparing social movement research across cultures (Vol. 1, pp. 173–196). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kriesberg, L. (1998). Coexistence and the reconciliation of communal conflicts. In E. Weiner (Ed.), The handbook of interethnic coexistence (pp. 182–198). New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  38. Kelman, H. C. (2006). The role of an international facilitating service for conflict resolution. International Negotiation, 11, 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kopstein, J. S. (1997). The politics of national reconciliation: Memory and institutions in German-Czech relations since 1989. Nationalism & Ethnic Politics, 3, 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Knox, C., & Quirk, P. (2000). Peace building in Northern Ireland, Israel and South Africa: Transition, Transformation and reconciliation. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Leatherman, J., DeMars, W., Gaffney, PD., Vayrynen, R. (1999) Breaking cycles of violence. Conflict prevention in intrastate crisis, West Hartford.Google Scholar
  42. Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lederach, J. P. (1998). Beyond violence: Building sustainable peace. In E. Weiner (Ed.), The handbook of interethnic coexistence (pp. 236–245). New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  44. Lipschutz, R. D. (1998). Beyond the neoliberal peace: From conflict resolution to social reconciliation. Social Justice: A Journal of Crime, Conflict and World Order, 25(4), 5–19.Google Scholar
  45. Long, W. J., & Brecke, P. (2003). War and reconciliation: Reason and emotion in conflict resolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. MacDonald, D. B. (2002). Balkan holocausts?: Serbian and Croatian victim-centred propaganda and the war in Yugoslavia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  47. MacDonald, D. (2009). Living together or hating each other? In C. Ingrao & T. A. Emmert (Eds.), Confronting the Yugoslav controversies (pp. 391–424). Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Malcolm, N. (1994). Bosnia: A short history. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Minow, M. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  50. Montville, J. V. (1993). The healing function in political conflict resolution. In D. J. D. Sandole & H. van der Merve (Eds.), Conflict resolution theory and practice: Integration and application (pp. 112–127). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  51. National Technical Information Service of the Department of Commerce of the U.S. (2009) http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~bip/docs/kosovo_polje/kosovo_polje.html.
  52. Norval, A. J. (1998). Memory, identity and the (im)possibility of reconciliation: The work of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa. Constellations, 5, 250–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Norval, A. J. (1999). Truth and reconciliation: The birth of the present and the reworking of history. Journal of African Studies, 25, 499–519.Google Scholar
  54. Oberschal, A. (2000). The manipulation of ethnicity: from ethnic cooperation to violence and war in Yugoslavia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23, 982–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An overview. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ramet, S. P. (1996). Balkan Babel: The disintegration of Yugoslav from the death of Tito to ethnic war (2nd edition). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  57. Ross, M. H. (1995). Psychocultural interpretation theory and peacemaking in ethnic conflicts. Political Psychology, 16, 523–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ross, M. H. (2001). Psychocultural interpretations and dramas: Identity dynamics in ethnic conflict. Political Psychology, 22, 157–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Salomon, G. (2004). A narrative-based view of coexistence education. Journal of Social Issues, 60(2), 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sekulic, D., Massey, G., & Hodson, R. (1994). Who were the Yugoslavs? Failed sources of a common identity in the former Yugoslavia. American Sociological Review, 59, 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sekulic, D., Massey, G., & Hodson, R. (2006). Ethnic intolerance and ethnic conflate in the dissolution of Yugoslavia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 29, 797–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity. American Psychologist, 56, 319–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Simpson, G. (1997). Reconstruction and reconciliation: Emerging from transition. Development in Practice, 7, 475–478.Google Scholar
  64. Shriver, D.W., Jr., (1995). An ethic for enemies: Forgiveness in politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Staub, E. (1998). Breaking the cycle of genocidal violence: Healing and reconciliation. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.), Perspectives on loss: A sourcebook (pp. 231–238). Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  66. Staub, E. (2000). Genocide and mass killing: Origins, prevention, healing, and reconciliation. Political Psychology, 21, 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Staub, E. (2003). The psychology of good and evil: the roots of benefiting and harming other. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Staub, E. (2006). Reconciliation after genocide, mass killing and intractable conflict: Understanding the roots of violence, psychological recovery, and steps toward a general theory. Political Psychology, 27(6), 867–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Staub, E., & Bar-Tal, D. (2003) Genocide, mass killing and intractable conflict: Roots, evolution, prevention and reconciliation. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 710–751). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  71. Thomas, R. (1999). The politics of Serbia in the 1990s. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Volkan, V. (1997). Blood lines: From ethnic pride to ethnic terrorism. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  73. Vollhardt, J. R. (2012). Collective victimization. In L. R. Tropp (Ed.), Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Wilmer, F. (1998). The social construction of conflict and reconciliation in the former Yugoslavia. Social Justice: A Journal of Crime, Conflict & World Order, 25(4), 90–113.Google Scholar
  75. Woodward, S. (1995). Balkan tragedy. Chaos and dissolution after the Cold War. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationTel-Aviv UniversityTel-AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Sarajevo School of Science and TechnologySarajevoBosnia-Herzegovina

Personalised recommendations