Beyond Collective Denial: Public Reactions to Human Rights Violations and the Struggle over the Moral Continuity of Communities

  • Guy Elcheroth
  • Dario Spini
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS, volume 17)


This chapter focuses on a particular aspect of social reconstruction and reconciliation processes: how can institutional frameworks for prosecuting human rights violations help post-war communities to avoid plunging into a climate of anomy, which can be highly detrimental for both individual well-being and render societies more vulnerable to future instability and violence? The creation of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in 1993 was based on the assumptions that the formal prosecution of severe human rights breaches as violations of international law helps to prevent further violence and that it facilitates post-war reconciliation processes. Seeking empirical indications of the impact of trials on communities, the authors propose a framework for analysing the relationships between the institutionalisation of human rights and psychosocial dynamics that are facilitative of their actual implementation, across the former Yugoslavia. Their findings support the assumption that collective reactions to human rights violations reflect public concerns about generalised moral ambiguity. A central motive of these concerns is to avoid a symbolic climate that potentially leads to social disintegration and psychological distress. Those individuals for whom psychological discomfort associated with a sense of anomy is the most salient, as well as those who perceive most vividly the need to preserve fundamental values of the community, are more likely to embrace condemnations of human rights violations. The strongest levels of public support for the prosecution of human rights violations were found within those contexts in which an institutional framework for sanctioning violations is the most salient. Further, the results stress that collective experiences of human rights violations predict moral worldviews when individual experiences are aggregated within communities based on a sense of common identity. These findings are consistent with the idea that symbolic dynamics resulting in collective reactions to human rights violations emerge within communities that are concerned and potentially mobilised by the threat posed to their internal cohesion by outrageous practices, precisely because their members share a relevant identity.


Former Yugoslavia War Social reconstruction Social representations Rights violations Anomy Community Public support 


  1. Ajdukovic, D. (2004). Medicine, conflict and survival. Social contexts of trauma and healing, 20(2), 120–135.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (1983/2006). Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (1st and 2nd ed.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Biro, M., Ajdukovic, D., Corkalo, D., Djipa, D., Milin, P., & Weinstein, H. M. (2004). Attitudes toward justice and social reconstruction in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. In E. Stover & H. M. Weinstein (Eds.), My neighbor, my enemy. Justice and community in the aftermath of mass atrocity (pp. 183–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Branscombe, N. R., Slugoski, B., & Kappen, D. M. (2004). The measurement of collective guilt: What it is and what it is not. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dinstein, Y. (1984).Human rights in armed conflict: International humanitarian law. In T. Meron (Ed.), Human rights in international law: Legal and policy issues (Vol. 2, pp. 345–368). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Doise, W., Clemence, A., & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). The quantitative analysis of social representations. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  7. Doise, W., Spini, D., & Clemence, A. (1999). Human rights studied as social representations in a cross-national context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eisgruber, C. L. & Sajo, A. (2005). Global justice and the bulwarks of localism (pp. 257–290). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Elcheroth, G. (2006). Individual-level and community-level effects of war trauma on social representations related to humanitarian law. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(6), 907–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elcheroth, G. (2007). Les expériences de vulnérabilité collective. De la fragilisation de principes normatifs à leur réaffirmation, de la problématisation de frontières intergroupes à la reconnaissance de droits universels. PhD thesis, University of Lausanne.Google Scholar
  11. Elcheroth, G., & Spini, D. (2007). Classes sociales et jugements normatifs de jeunes français: la justification du système par les défavorisés revisitée. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 75–76, 117–131.Google Scholar
  12. Elcheroth, G., & Spini, D. (2009). Public support for the prosecution of human rights violations in the former Yugoslavia. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 15, 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elcheroth, G.,Penic, S., Fasel, R., Giudici, F., Glaeser, S., Joye, D., Le Goff, J.-M., Morselli, D., & Spini, D. (2013). Spatially weighted context data and their application to collective war experiences. Sociological Methodology, 14.Google Scholar
  14. Erikson, K. (1976). Disaster at Buffalo Creek. Loss of communality at Buffalo Creek. American Journal of Psychology, 133, 302–5.Google Scholar
  15. Fletcher, L. E., & Weinstein, H. (2004). A world unto itself? The application of international justice in the former Yugoslavia. In E. Stover & H. M. Weinstein (Eds.), My neighbor, my enemy. Justice and community in the aftermath of mass atrocity (pp. 183–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gely, R., & Sanchez-Mazas, M. (2006). The philosophical implications of a research on the social representations of human rights. Social Science Information, 45(3), 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartmann, F. (2007). Paix et châtiment. Les guerres secrètes de la politique et de la justice internationales. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  18. Marks, S. P. (2005). Creating a human rights culture: The role of local knowledge in Cambodia’s difficult transition. In C. L. Eisgruber & A. Sajo (Eds.), Global justice and the bulwarks of localism (pp. 257–290). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. McClosky, H., & Schaar, J. H. (1965). Psychological dimensions of anomy. American Sociological Review, 30(1), 14–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Norenzayan, A., & Heine, S. J. (2005). Psychological universals: What are they and how can we know? Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 763–784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Opotow, S. (2001). Reconciliation in times of impunity: Challenges for social justice. Social Justice Research, 14(2), 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Reicher, S. (2004). The context of social identity: Domination, resistance and change. Political Psychology, 25(6), 921–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reicher, S. D., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). On the agency of individuals and groups: Lessons from the BBC Prison Study. In T. Postmes & J. Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 237–257). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosler, N., Bar-Tal, D., Sharvit, K., Halperin, E., & Raviv, A. (2009). Moral aspects of prolonged occupation: Implications for an occupying society. In S. Schuzzarello, K. Kinnvall, & K. Monroe (Eds.), On behalf of others: The morality of care in a global world (pp. 211–232). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schuman, H., & Scott, J. (1989). Generations and collective memories. American Sociological Review, 54(3), 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Silber, L., & Little, A. (1997). Yugoslavia: Death of a nation (3rd ed.). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  28. Spini, D., & Doise, W. (2005). Universal human rights and duties as normative social representations. In N. J. Finkel & F. Moghaddam (Eds.), The psychology of human rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries (pp. 21–48). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spini, D., Elcheroth, G., & Fasel, R. (2005). Transition à l’âge adulte dans des contextes de vulnérabilité collective. Préparation de l’enquête TRACES. Scientific report for the Swiss National Science Foundation. University of Lausanne.Google Scholar
  30. Spini, D., Elcheroth, G., & Fasel, R. (2007). The TRACES survey data. Methodological and technical report. University of Lausanne.Google Scholar
  31. Spini, D., Elcheroth, G., & Fasel, R. (2008). The impact of group norms and generalization of risks across groups on judgments of war behavior. Political Psychology, 29(6), 919–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stover, E., & Weinstein, H. M. (2004). My neighbor, my enemy. Justice and community in the aftermath of mass atrocity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tabeau, E., & Bijak, J. (2005). War-related deaths in the 1992–1995 armed conflicts in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A critique of previous estimates and recent results. European Journal of Population, 21(2–3), 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilmer, F. (2002). The social construction of man, the state and war. Identity, conflict, and violence in former Yugoslavia. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Social and Political SciencesSwiss National Centre of Competence in Research LIVES at the University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations