Abstract
Once we have established that social and psychological functions of collective out group blame vary across contexts, it becomes important to explain the role of contextual factors more precisely. Two central questions are further investigated in this chapter: Under what circumstances are people prone to resent other groups for past wrongdoings? How is out-group blame related to in-group protest? In both cases, the authors propose an argument that completes or qualifies traditional perspectives on intergroup relations and social conflict. These tend to stress the importance of past victimisation. As a complement to this work, the authors show here that adverse societal circumstances can lay the ground for public mobilisation against out groups, even when these conditions are not a direct consequence of past victimisation caused by external enemies. In the first part of the chapter, the authors focus on the context of the new Croatian nation-state. Levels of social and economic deprivation in Croatia range from relatively low to moderate and are largely connected to direct consequences of ethnicised war. Findings show how these structural particularities have created an opportunity to demobilise system critical opposition: higher levels of social and economic deprivation here lead to stronger out-group blame but not to increased internal protest. Lower levels of popularity of the main left-oriented oppositional party in the most deprived areas partially account for this pattern. In the second part of the chapter, analyses are presented that show that, contrary to findings for Croatia, at a larger scale, internal protest is highest within those regions of the whole former Yugoslavia that have endured the highest level of social and economic deprivation. Furthermore, the highest levels of assignment of collective guilt to other groups can similarly be found in the most deprived regions. Furthermore, the individual-level relationship between internal protest and out-group blame varies significantly between contexts: with increasing rates of social and economic deprivation, these two dimensions of political attitudes become increasingly unrelated. These findings provide an illustration of the way in which societal circumstances of system threat can provide both an opportunity to mobilise the public towards domestic reforms and an impetus for elites to mobilise out-group blame.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The other two were attitudes toward abortion and homosexual marriage. (Bagic 2007)
References
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
Ajdukovic, D., & Corkalo Biruski, D. (2008). Caught between the ethnic sides: inter-ethnic relations of children and parents in the post-war community. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 337–347.
Blalock, H. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York: Wiley.
Bagic, D. (2007). Politički rasjepi i stranačke preferencije na izborima za Hrvatski sabor 2003. Politicka misao, 4, 93–115.
Bogardus, E. S. (1925). Measuring social distance. Journal of Applied Sociology, 9, 299–308.
Branscombe, N. R., Slugoski, B., & Kappen, D. M. (2004). The measurement of collective guilt: What it is and what it is not. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje. (Eds.), Collective guilt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Broz, S. (2005). Good people in an evil time: Portraits of complicity and resistance in the Bosnian war. New York: Other Press.
Castano, E., & Ginner-Sorolla, R. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in reponse to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 804–818.
Cohen, L. (1993). Broken bonds. The disintegration of Yugoslavia. Boulder: Westview Press.
Cular, G. (2003). Stranačka identifikacija i potpora demokraciji u Hrvatskoj. Politička misao, 40 (4), 3–24.
Culic, M. (1999). Tuđman. Anatomija neprosvijećenog apsolutizma. Feral Tribune, Split.
Cuckovic N. (2002). Siva ekonomija i proces privatizacije u Hrvatskoj, 1997–2001. Financijska teorija i praksa, 26(1), 245–271.
Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven: Yale Press.
Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 31, 410–436.
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–886.
Druzic, I. (2007). Progress and regress symmetry of the Croatian economy, Ekonomski pregled, 58(3–4), 131–157.
Elcheroth, G. (2006). Individual-level and community-level effects of war trauma on social representations related to humanitarian law. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(6), 907–930.
Elcheroth, G., & Spini, D. (2007). Classes sociales et jugements normatifs de jeunes français: la justification du système par les défavorisés revisitée. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 75–76, 117–131.
Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138.
Gagnon, V. P. Jr. (2006). The myth of ethnic war: Serbia and Croatia in the 1990s. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Green, D. P., Glaser, J., & Rich, A. (1998). From lynching to gay-bashing: The elusive connection between economic conditions and hate crime. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 82–92.
Gregurek M. (2001). Stupanj i učinci privatizacije u Hrvatskoj. Ekonomski pregled, 52(1–2), 155–188.
Grubisa, D. (2005). Political corruption in transitional Croatia: The pecularities of a model. Politička misao, 5, 55–74.
Halloran, M. (2007). Indigenous reconciliation in Australia: Do values, identity and collective guilt matter? Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 1–18.
Harmon-Jones, E., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Simon, L. (1996). The effects of mortality salience on intergroup discrimination between minimal groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 677–681.
Henjak, A. (2005). Determinante ideološke samoidentifikacije hrvatskih birača na parlamentarnim izborima 2003. godine. Politička misao, 42(2), 81–110.
Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analyses. Techniques and applications. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hovland, C. I., & Sears, R. R. (1940). Minor studies of aggression: VI. Correlation of lynchings with economic indices. The Journal of Psychology, 9, 301–310.
Ivancic, V. (2000). Točka na u. Slučaj Šakić: anatomija jednog skandala. Feral Tribune, Split.
Japec, L., & Sucur, Z. (2007). Kvaliteta zivota u Hrvatskoj. Regionalne nejednakosti. Program Ujedinjenih naroda za razvoj: (UNDP) u Hrvatskoj, LDK, Zagreb.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375.
Kernell, S. (1978). Explaining presidential popularity. How ad hoc theorizing, misplaced emphasis, and insufficient care in measuring one’s variables refuted common sense and led conventional wisdom down the path of anomalies. The American Political Science Review, 72(2), 506–522.
Kramer, G. H. (1971). Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896–1964. American Political Science Review, 65, 131–143.
Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249–277.
Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1990). Economics and elections: The major western democracies. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
McGarty, C. & Bliuc, A. (2004). Refining the meaning of the “collective” in collective guilt: Harm, guilt and apology in Australia. In N. R., Branscombe & B. Doosje. (Eds.), Collective Guilt. International perspectives (str. 112–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGregor, I., Zanna, M. P., Holmes, J. G., & Spencer, S. J. (2001). Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 472–488.
Miller, N. E. (1941). The frustration-aggression hypothesis. Psychological Review, 48, 337–342.
Moore D., & Vamvakidis A. (2008). Ekonomski rast u Hrvatskoj: mogucnosti i ogranicenja. Financijska teorija i praksa, 32(1), 1–28.
Muller, E. N., Jukam, T. O., & Seligson, M. A. (1982). Diffuse political support and antisystem political behaviour: A comparative analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 240–264.
Nadler, A., & Liviatan, I. (2004). Intergroup reconciliation process in Israel: Theoretical analysis and empirical findings. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 216–235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olzak S. (1990). The political context of competition: Lynching and urban racial violence, 1882–1914. Social forces, 69(2), 395–421.
Petricevic, D. (2000). Kriminal u hrvatskoj pretvorbi: tko, kako, zašto. Zagreb: Abakus.
Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. (2004). HLM6. Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.
Roccas, S., Klar, Y., & Liviatan, I. (2004). Exonerating cognitions, group identification, and personal values as predictors of collective guilt among Jewish-Israelis. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 130–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Brehm, J. W. (2004). Gender inequality and the intensity of men's collective guilt. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 75–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sekulic, D. (1992). Nationalism versus democracy: Legacies of Marxism. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 6(1), 113–132.
Sekulic, D. (1997). The creation and dissolution of the multinational state: The case of Yugoslavia. Nations and Nationalism, 3(2), 165–179.
Sekulic, D. (2001) Je li nacionalizam hrvatska sudbina? Revija za sociologiju, 3–4, 32, 57–174.
Sekulic D., Sporer Z., Hodson R., Massey G. & Zupanov, J. (2004). Sukobi i tolerancija. O društvenoj uvjetovanosti nacionalizma i demokracija. Naklada Jesenski i Turk. Hrvatsko sociolosko drustvo, Zagreb.
Siber, I. (1997). War and the changes in social distance toward the ethnic minorities in Croatia. Politicka misao, 34(5), 3–26.
Siber, I. (1998). Povijesni i etnički rascjepi u hrvatskom društvu. In M. Kasapovic, I. Siber, & N. Zakosek (Eds.), Birači i demokracija: utjecaj ideoloških rascjepa na politički život (51-94). Zagreb: Alinea.
Spini, D., Elcheroth, G., & Fasel, R. (2007). The TRACES survey data. Methodological and technical report. Lausanne: University of Lausanne.
Staub, E., & Bar-Tal, D. (2003). Genocide, mass killing, and intractable conflict: Roots, evolution, prevention, and reconciliation. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.),Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Uzelac G. (1998). Franjo Tudjman’s nationalist ideology. East European Quarterly, 13(4), 449–472.
Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 288–303.
Zakosek, N. (1998). Ideološki rascjepi i stranačke preferencije hrvatskih birača. In M. Kasapovic, I. Siber & N. Zakosek (Eds.), Birači i demokracija. Zagreb: Alinea.
Zakosek, N. & Cular G. (2004). Croatia. In F. H. Aarebrot, S. Berglund & J. Ekman (Eds.), The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe. 451–492. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Zakosek N. (2007) The heavy burden of history: Political uses of the past in the Yugoslav successor states. Politicka misao, 5, 29–43.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Penic, S., Corkalo Biruski, D., Elcheroth, G. (2014). Threatened Powers: When Blaming “the others” Grows out of Internal Instability and Protest. In: Spini, D., Elcheroth, G., Corkalo Biruski, D. (eds) War, Community, and Social Change. Peace Psychology Book Series, vol 17. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7491-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7491-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7490-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7491-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)