Abstract
Mental health courts (MHCs) are an ever-growing popular solution to a well-documented problem—the overabundance of persons with mental illness in the criminal justice system. MHCs are but one of several types of specialty courts designed to improve the practices and effectiveness of criminal justice. This chapter summarizes what is known about past and present MHCs using the Council of State Governments’ (CSG) Ten Essential Elements of a Mental Health Court as a guiding framework (Thompson et al., Improving responses to people with mental illnesses: The essential elements of a mental health court, 2008). Then, what the next generation of MHCs may look like is forecasted on the basis of the trends, research, and ongoing controversies surrounding these specialty courts. At the end, a preliminary conclusion is offered that based on the progression of the courts—which are criminal justice inventions and entities—regressing back toward a more traditional criminalistic and even adversarial approach is a reasonable expectation. A question that remains to be addressed is whether MHCs and other specialty courts will continue to be “special.” How will they distinguish themselves from traditional courts? As the courts adopt a more legalistic and due process orientation, the challenge will be to retain the features that set them apart from treatment-as-usual in the criminal justice system, features that were created in response to the perceived ineffectiveness of said traditional treatment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Almquist, L., & Dodd, E. (2009). Mental health courts: A guide to research-informed policy and practice. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center. http://www.consensusproject.org/jc_publications/mental-health-courts-a-guide-to-research-informed-policy-and-practice/Mental_Health_Court_Research_Guide.pdf.
Boothroyd, R., Poythress, N., McGaha, A., & Petrila, J. (2003). The Broward Mental Health Court: Process, outcomes and service utilization. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26, 55–71.
Cocazza, J., & Shufelt, J. (2006). Juvenile mental health courts: An emerging strategy. Delmar, NY: Research and Program Brief, National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice.
Cohen, T. H., & Reaves, B. A. (2006). Felony defendants in large urban counties, 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Cosden, M., Ellens, J., Schnell, J., & Yamini-Diouf, Y. (2005). Efficacy of a mental health treatment court with assertive community treatment. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 199–214.
Council of State Governments. (2006). Mental health courts: A national snapshot. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center.
Council of State Governments. (2008). Mental health courts: A primer for policymakers and practitioners. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center.
Dusky v. U.S., 362 U.S. 402 (1960).
Fisler, C. (2005). Building true and managing risk: A look at a felony mental health court. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 587–604.
Goldkamp, J. D., & Irons-Guynn, C. (2000). Emerging judicial strategies for the mentally ill in the criminal caseload: Mental health courts in Fort Lauderdale, Seattle, San Bernardino, and Anchorage. Washington DC, US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance Monograph, pub. No. NCJ 182504.
Griffin, P., Steadman, H. J., & Petrila, J. (2002). The use of criminal charges and sanctions in mental health courts. Psychiatric Services, 53, 1285–1289.
Henrickx, H. A., Swart, S. C., Ama, S. M., Dolezal, C. D., & King, S. (2005). Rearrest and linkage to mental health services among clients of the Clark County mental health court program. Psychiatric Services, 56, 853–857.
Kaye, J. S. (2004). Delivering justice today: A problem-solving approach. Yale Law and Policy Review, 22, 125–151.
Linhorst, D. M., Dirks-Linhorst, P. A., Stiffelman, S., Gianino, J., Bernsen, H. L., & Kelley, B. J. (2010). Implementing the essential elements of a mental health court: The experiences of a large multijurisdictional suburban county. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 37, 427–442. Published online October, 1, 2009.
McNiel, D. E., & Binder, R. L. (2007). Effectiveness of a mental health court in reducing criminal recidivism and violence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 1395–1403.
Moore, M. E., & Hiday, V. A. (2006). Mental health court outcomes: A comparison of re-arrest and re-arrest severity between mental health court and traditional court participants. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 659–674.
Naples, M., Morris, L. S., & Steadman, H. J. (2007). Factors in disproportionate representation among persons recommended by programs accepted by courts for jail diversion. Psychiatric Services, 58, 1095–1101.
Petrila, J. (2003). An introduction to special jurisdiction courts. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26, 3–12.
Petrila, J. (2006). Dispelling the myths about sharing data between mental health and criminal justice systems. TAPA Center for Jail Diversion Easy Access Net Teleconference, Delmar, NY. Available at http://www.gainscenter.samhsa.gov/html/resources/presentation_materials/pdfs/Myths_11_13_06.pdf.
Petrila, J., & Redlich, A. D. (2008). Options for diverting persons with mental illness from the criminal justice system. Court Review, 43, 164–173.
Pinals, D. A. (2005). Where two road meet: Restoration of competence to stand trial from a clinical perspective. New England School of Law, 31(1), 81–108.
Poythress, N. G., Petrila, J., McGaha, A., & Boothroyd, R. (2002). Perceived coercion and procedural justice in the Broward County Mental Health Court. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 25, 517–533. doi:10.1016/S0160-2527(01)00110-8.
Redlich, A. D. (2005). Voluntary, but knowing and intelligent? Comprehension in mental health courts. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 11, 605–619.
Redlich, A. D., Steadman, H. J., Monahan, J., Petrila, J., & Griffin, P. (2005). The second generation of mental health courts. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 11, 527–538.
Redlich, A. D., Steadman, H. J., Robbins, P. C., Monahan, J., & Petrila, J. (2006). Patterns of practice in mental health courts: A national survey. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 347–362.
Redlich, A. D., Hoover, S., Summers, A., & Steadman, H. J. (2010a). Enrollment in mental health courts: Voluntariness, knowingness, and adjudicative competence. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 91–104.
Redlich, A. D., Steadman, H. J., Callahan, L., Robbins, P. C., Vessilinov, R., & Ozdogru, A. A. (2010b). The use of mental health court appearances in supervision. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33, 272–277.
Redlich, A. D., Liu, S., Steadman, H. J., Callahan, L., & Robbins, P. C. (2012). Is diversion swift? Comparing mental health court and traditional criminal justice processing. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 420–433.
Seltzer, T. (2005). Mental health courts: A misguided attempt to address the criminal justice system’s unfair treatment of people with mental illnesses. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 570–586.
Steadman, H. J. (2005). A guide to collecting mental health outcome data. A publication of the Council of State Government, prepared for the Bureau of Justice Assistance. http://www.consensusproject.org/jc_publications/guide-to-collecting-mental-health-court-outcome-data/MHC-Outcome-Data.pdf.
Steadman, H. J., Morris, S. M., & Dennis, D. L. (1995). The diversion of mentally ill persons from jails to community-based services. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 1630–1635.
Steadman, H. J., Stainbrook., K. A.,, Griffin, P., Draine, J., Dupont, R., & Horey, C. (2001). A specialized crisis response as a core element of police-based diversion programs. Psychiatric Services, 52, 219–222.
Steadman, H. J., Redlich, A. D., Griffin, P., Petrila, J., & Monahan, J. (2005). From referral to disposition: Case processing in seven mental health courts. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 1–12.
Steadman, H. J., Osher, F. C., Robbins, P. C., Case, B., & Samuels, S. (2009). Prevalence of serious mental illness among jail inmates. Psychiatric Services, 60, 761–765.
Steadman, H. J., Redlich, A. D., Callahan, L., Robbins, P. C., & Vesselinov, R. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of mental health courts: A multi-site study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 167–172.
Stefan, S., & Winick, B. J. (2005). A dialogue on mental health courts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 507–526.
Thompson, M., Osher, F., & Tomasini-Joshi, D. (2008). Improving responses to people with mental illnesses: The essential elements of a mental health court. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center.
Winick, B. J., & Wexler, D. B. (2003). Judging in a therapeutic key: Therapeutic jurisprudence and the courts. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Redlich, A. (2013). The Past, Present, and Future of Mental Health Courts. In: Wiener, R., Brank, E. (eds) Problem Solving Courts. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7402-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7403-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)