Skip to main content

Challenges of Democratic Governance in South Asia and Beyond

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
In Search of Better Governance in South Asia and Beyond

Part of the book series: Public Administration, Governance and Globalization ((PAGG,volume 3))

  • 1070 Accesses

Abstract

The history of public governance in South Asia has had a chequered history characterized by stability based on the paternalistic culture of the region coupled with formalism introduced during the British colonial rule. More recently, the state led governance that dominated pre-colonial, colonial, and post-colonial periods is in the retreat in the new-liberal, market led globalized world. Planned economy which once characterized some South Asian nations such as Bangladesh in the early 1970s and India until the 1980s has been replaced by private initiatives, liberalization, export centered growth, and market-oriented reforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Recently, the ruling party in Bangladesh the Awami League (AL) proposed to the Bangladesh Election Commission that expelled candidates from the party must not be allowed to contest elections at least for two consecutive elections. This is to avoid split of votes and reducing the chance of rebel candidates within the party to run election independently and cause defeat to the candidate nominated by the party. This move by the party in power demonstrates that political parties can even advance undemocratic decision to disqualify a candidate (not accused of any criminal offence) to run election in the multiparty democratic system. This testifies again how important it is to win elections.

  2. 2.

    “Every city is assigned a rating of relative comfort for over 30 qualitative and quantitative factors across five broad categories: stability; healthcare; culture and environment; education; and infrastructure. Each factor in a city is rated as acceptable, tolerable, uncomfortable, undesirable or intolerable” (South Asia Mail blog 2012).

References

  • Askvik S, Jamil I and Dhakal TN (2011) Citizens' trust in public and political institutions in Nepal. Int Political Sci Rev 32(4): 417-437 (September)

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans PB (1989) Predatory, developmental, and other apparatuses: a comparative political economy perspective on the third world state. Sociol Forum 4(4): 561–587 (Special Issue, December)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque MS (2001a) Recent transition in governance in South Asia: contexts, dimensions, and implications. Int J Public Adm 24(12): 1405–1436 (August)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque AS (2001b) Governance and public management: the South Asian context. Int J Public Adm 24(12): 1289–1297 (August)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque MS (2004) Governance and bureaucracy in Singapore: contemporary reforms and implications. Int Polit Sci Rev 25(2): 227–240 (April)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque ST (2011) The normative roots of governancetheories: prospects and challenges from Bangladesh perspective. In Jamil I, Aminuzamman SM, Askvik S, Haque ST (eds) Understanding governance and public policy in Bangladesh, North South University, Dhaka, pp 47–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil I, Panday PK (2008) The elusive peace accord in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh and the continuous agonies of the indigenous people. Journal of contemporary and commonwealth politics 46(4): 464–489 (November)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil I, Aminuzzaman SA, Askvik S, Haque ST (2011) Introduction, in understanding governance and public policy in Bangladesh. North South University, Dhaka, pp 6–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochanek S (2000) Governance, patronage politics, and democratic transition in Bangladesh. Asian Survey 40(3): 530–550 (May–June)

    Google Scholar 

  • March J, Olsen JP (1985) Democratic governance. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Panday PK, Jamil I (2009) Conflict in the Chittagong Hill tracts of Bangladesh: an unimplemented accord and continued violence. Asian Survey 49(6): 1052–1070 (November/December)

    Google Scholar 

  • South Asia Mail (2012) The worst cities are in South Asia. https://indiatugofwar2009.pbworks.com/w/page/39735637/2B7U. Accessed 25 Nov 2012

  • The Economist (2009) Out goes Gilani: the Supreme Court joins the depressing tussle for the levers of power, 23rd June. http://www.economist.com/node/21557374?zid=306&ah=1b164dbd43b0cb27ba0d4c3b12a5e227. Accessed 25th Nov 2012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ishtiaq Jamil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jamil, I., Askvik, S., Dhakal, T.N. (2013). Challenges of Democratic Governance in South Asia and Beyond. In: Jamil, I., Askvik, S., Dhakal, T. (eds) In Search of Better Governance in South Asia and Beyond. Public Administration, Governance and Globalization, vol 3. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7372-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics