Abstract
A progressive agenda for curriculum change in a chiropractic course in a Melbourne university involved case-based materials and online video annotation. The overall learning objective was to promote clinical thinking earlier in the undergraduate chiropractic students, which did not substantively occur until clinical placement in year 4 of the study programme. Initially the traditional lecture-centred learning mode was infused with paper-based case studies, which then evolved to video-cases and, most recently, to interactive video annotation aided by the introduction of a media annotation tool (MAT). This tool positioned the case videos into an active environment requiring small group and scaffolding activities to stimulate clinical thinking in the second year of the programme. Lectures continued, but became integrative with MAT activities and ultimately responsive to student work in MAT. The resultant integrative curriculum model unfolded over two distinct but interlinked learning cycles over the semester. As part of a larger multiple-case study, data was collected via surveys, combined observation and interview sessions, and post-subject learning artefact analysis. Student feedback was largely positive, with qualifiers such as need for both further articulation of the process and more cases. The teachers also responded positively and are currently integrating further video-cases using MAT into the same subject plus within additional subjects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Black, K. A. (1993). What to do when you stop lecturing: Become a guide and a resource. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(2), 140–144.
Carroll, N. L., Markauskaite, L., & Calvo, R. A. (2007). E-portfolios for developing transferable skills in a freshman engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 50(4), 360–366.
Colasante, M. (2010). Future-focused learning via online anchored discussion, connecting learners with digital artefacts, other learners, and teachers. In C. H. Steel, M. J. Keppell, P. Gerbic, & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future (pp. 211–221). Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010.
Colasante, M. (2011). Using video annotation to reflect on and evaluate physical education pre-service teaching practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 66–88. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/colasante.html
Colasante, M., & Lang, J. (2012). Can a media annotation tool enhance online engagement with learning? A multi-case work-in-progress report. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Computer Supported Education (Vol. 2, pp. 455–464). Porto. Ed. José Cordeiro, Markus Helfert and Maria João Martins, 16–18 April 2012.
Dalziel, J. (2012). Using learning design for innovative eTeaching. Presentation for ALTC National Teaching Fellowship. Swinburne University, Melbourne, 30 May 2012.
de la Harpe, B., & Radloff, A. (2006). Lessons learnt from three projects to design learning environments that support ‘generic’ skill development. Journal of Learning Design, 1(2), 21–34. http://www.jld.qut.edu.au/
Gray, M., & Aspland, T. (2011). Midwifery practice in the university context: Perspectives of postgraduate students on the effectiveness of case-based learning in preparation for the workplace. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 6, 38–45. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2010.07.003.
Hansen, J., & Krackov, S. (1994). The use of small group case-based exercises in human gross anatomy: A method for introducing active learning in a traditional course format. Clinical Anatomy, 7, 357–366.
Holt, K. R., & Beck, R. W. (2005). Chiropractic patients presenting to the New Zealand College of Chiropractic teaching clinic: A short description of patients and patient complaints. Chiropractic Journal of Australia, 35, 122–124.
Kimpton, A. J., Polus, B. P., & Walsh, M. J. (2011). Demographics, clinical characteristics and response to care of patients attending chiropractic teaching clinics. In Chiropractic and Osteopathic College of Australasia National Conference. Melbourne, 8–9 October 2011.
Loghmani, M. T., Bayliss, A. J., Strunk, V., & Altenburger, P. (2011). An integrative, longitudinal case-based learning model as a curriculum strategy to enhance teaching and learning. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 25, 42–50. http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.lib.rmit.edu.au/docview/863250520?accountid=13552
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. A. (2001). When learning is just a click away. Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 390–397.
McGill, L. (2011). Curriculum innovation: pragmatic approaches to transforming learning and teaching through technologies. Transforming curriculum delivery through technology programme synthesis report. JISC e-Learning Programme.
Muller, D., Eklund, J., & Sharma, M. (2006). The future of multimedia learning: Essential issues for research. Retrieved on May 15, 2012, from http://www.aare.edu.au/05pap/mul05178.pdf
Muller, D. A., Sharma, M. D., & Reimann, P. (2008). Raising cognitive load with linear multimedia to promote conceptual change. Science Education, 92(2), 278–296.
Niyendo, J. (1990). A comparison of low back pain profiles of chiropractic teaching clinic patients with patients attending private clinicians. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 13(8), 437–447.
Niyendo, J. A., & Haldeman, S. (1986). A critical study of the student interns’ practice activities in a chiropractic college teaching clinic. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 9(3), 197–207.
Niyendo, J., Phillip, R. B., Meeker, W. C., Konsler, G., Jansen, R., & Menon, M. (1989). A comparison of patients and patient complaints at six chiropractic college teaching clinics. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 12(2), 79–85.
Reimer, S., Hörnlein, A., Tony, H. P., Kraemer, D., Oberück, S., Betz, C., et al. (2006). Assessment of a case-based training system (d3web.Train) in rheumatology. Rheumatology International, 26, 942–948.
Rich, P. J., & Trip, T. (2011). Ten essential questions educators should ask when using video annotation tools. TechTrends, 55(6), 16–24.
Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sandefur, R., Febbo, T. A., & Rupert, R. L. (2005). Assessment of knowledge of primary care activities in a sample of medical and chiropractic students. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 28, 336–344.
Shokar, G. S., Bulik, R. J., & Baldwin, C. D. (2005). Student perspectives on the integration of interactive web-based cases into a family medicine clerkship. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 17, 74–79. doi:10.1207/sl15328015tlml701_13.
Simonsohn, A., & Fischer, M. (2004). Evaluation of case-based computerized learning program (CASUS) for medical students during their clinical. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 129, 552–556.
Stolovitch, H., & Keeps, E. (1991). Selecting and writing case studies for improving human performance. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 4(1), 43–55.
Sutyak, J., Lebeau, R., & O’Donnell, A. (1998). Unstructured cases in case-based learning benefit students with primary care career preferences. The American Journal of Surgery, 175, 503–507.
Talmage, D. M. (2001). Teaching with cases to enhance the clinical and problem-solving skills and integration skills of fourth-term chiropractic students. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 15(2), 53–60.
The Pennsylvania State University. (2012). Introduction to classroom flipping. Teaching and learning with technology, a unit of its@PennState. The Pennsylvania State University. Retrieved on May 16, 2012, from http://tlt.its.psu.edu/flip
van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2012). Teacher’s scaffolding behavior in CSCL; A Case Study. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (Vol. 2, pp. 304–312). Porto. Ed. José Cordeiro, Markus Helfert and Maria João Martins, 16–18 April 2012.
Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Williams, B. (2006). Qualitative analysis of undergraduate paramedic students’ perceptions of using case-based learning in an online learning environment. Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care, 4, Article Number 990191.
Williams, B. (2009). Do undergraduate paramedic students embrace case-based learning using a blended teaching approach? A 3-year review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 421–439. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet25/williams.pdf
Wyatt, L. H., Perle, S. M., Murphy, D. R., & Hyde, T. E. (2005). The necessary future of chiropractic education: A North American perspective. Chiropractic & Osteopathy, 13(10), doi:10.11.1186/1746-1340-13-10
Yoo, M. S., Park, J. H., & Lee, S. R. (2010). The effects of case-based learning using video on clinical decision making and learning motivation in undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 40, 863–871.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge RMIT University project sponsors, the Learning and Teaching Investment Fund (LTIF 2011), and the College of Science, Engineering and Health: Academic Development Group. The authors would also like to acknowledge G. Marchiori for his graphical contributions to this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Colasante, M., Kimpton, A., Hallam, J. (2014). A Curriculum Model to Promote (Chiropractic) Clinical Thinking with Video-Case Annotation. In: Gosper, M., Ifenthaler, D. (eds) Curriculum Models for the 21st Century. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7366-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7366-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7365-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7366-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)