Educating the Anesthesia Provider for Urologic Procedures

Chapter

Abstract

Current educational modalities allow for the teaching of both basic and advanced skills related to providing anesthesia for urologic procedures while minimizing the potential for patient harm. Partial task training devices allow students to practice and become facile with procedures without putting patients at risk. Simulation is rapidly gaining acceptance as the gold standard for procedural education as full-scale mannequin simulators can be utilized to directly demonstrate the physiologic response to anesthetic interventions associated with these procedures. Simulations can also be used to evaluate clinical performance in multiple areas of patient care. In this chapter, some of the techniques currently being used to teach these skills are outlined and the advantages and limitations of the currently available technology discussed.

Keywords

Catheter Glycine Mannitol Refraction Sorbitol 

References

  1. 1.
    Grenvik A, Schaefer J. From Resusci- Anne to Sim-Man: the evolution of simulators in medicine. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(2):S56–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Okuda Y, Bryson EO, DeMaria Jr S, Jacobson L, Quinones J, Shen B, Levine AI. The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence? Mt Sinai J Med. 2009;76(4):330–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Okuda Y, Bond WF, Bonfante G, et al. National growth in simulation training within emergency medicine residency programs, 2003–2008. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:1113–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fernandez R, Wang E, Vozenilek JA, et al. Simulation center accreditation and programmatic benchmarks: a review for emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(10):1093–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gaba DM. Crisis resource management and teamwork training in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(1):3–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Levine AI, Bryson EO. The use of multimodality simulation in the evaluation of the physicians with suspected lapsed competence. J Crit Care. 2008;23(2):197–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    DeMaria Jr S, Bryson EO, Mooney TJ, Silverstein JH, Reich DL, Bodian C, Levine AI. Adding emotional stressors to training in simulated cardiopulmonary arrest enhances participant performance. Med Educ. 2010;44(10):1006–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79(suppl):S70–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schaefer 3rd JJ. Simulators and difficult airway management skills. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004;14(1):28–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Uppal V, Kearns RJ, McGrady EM. Evaluation of M43B Lumbar puncture simulator-II as a training tool for identification of the epidural space and lumbar puncture. Anaesthesia. 2011;66(6):493–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 2011;86(6):706–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bryson EO, Levine AI. The simulation theater: a theoretic discussion of concepts and constructs that enhance learning. J Crit Care. 2008;23(2):185–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lighthall GK, Barr J, Howard SK, et al. Use of a fully simulated intensive care unit environment for critical event management training for internal medicine residents. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:2437–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muñoz AE, Abizanda PF, Pdel DR, Rodríguez GF. Cardiac arrest after spinal anesthesia in a patient with neurally mediated syncope. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2011;58(7):412–6.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wayne DB, Butter J, Siddall VJ, et al. Mastery learning of advanced cardiac life support skills by internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:251–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134(1):172–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Satoh K, Sakamoto N, Shinohe Y, Satoh M, Joh S. Indigo carmine-induced bradycardia in a patient during general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2001;92(1):276–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Levine AI, Flynn BC, Bryson EO, DeMaria Jr S. Simulation-based MOCA course optimization: the use of multi-modality educational activities. J Clin Anesth. 2012;24:68–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    DeMaria Jr S, Levine AI, Bryson EO. The use of multi-modality simulation in the retraining of the physician for medical licensure. J Clin Anesth. 2010;22(4):294–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bryson EO, Levine AI. One approach to the return to residency for anesthesia residents recovering from opioid addiction. J Clin Anesth. 2008;20(5):397–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Anesthesiology and Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiThe Mount Sinai Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations