Abstract
This chapter discusses the fourth step of health impact assessment (HIA), development of recommendations for how to modify the project or policy under consideration. Recommendations represent a translation of findings from the assessment into actions that may improve the health of the affected population. The chapter begins with a discussion of several key success factors that may influence the extent to which recommendations are likely to be implemented. These are: recommendations should flow from the results of the assessment; they should be based on public health principles of harm avoidance; they should be evidence based; they should both mitigate harms and enhance health benefits; they should be specific and actionable; and they should be useable by those who must implement them. The text also discusses the various advantages and disadvantages of including decision makers in the development of recommendations, as well as possibilities and room for variation in styling the format of the recommendations section. The chapter concludes with examples of recommendations from four HIAs conducted on a diverse set of projects and policies, selected because they represent strong and effective recommendations demonstrating many of the key success factors described earlier.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Committee on Health Impact Assessment, National Research Council (2011) Improving health in the United States: the role of health impact assessment. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Human Impact Partners (2012) Rapid health impact assessment of the proposed Farmers Field development. http://www.humanimpact.org/component/jdownloads/finish/8/176/0. Accessed 18 June 2013
International Finance Corporation (2012) Overview of performance standards on environmental and social sustainability, effective Jan 1 2012. International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC
NewFields Companies (2012). Draft Wishbone Hill Mine health impact assessment. Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Anchorage. http://www.epi.alaska.gov/hia/WishboneHillDraftHIA.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2013
Public Health Leadership Society (2002) Principles of the ethical practice of public health, version 2.2. American Public Health Association. http://www.apha.org/NR/rdonlyres/1CED3CEA-287E-4185-9CBD-BD405FC60856/0/ethicsbrochure.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2013
Upstream Public Health (2011) Oregon farm to school policy HIA. http://www.healthimpactproject.org/resources/document/Upstream-HIA-Oregon-Farm-to-School-policy.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2013
Upstream Public Health & Oregon Health and Sciences University (2009) Health impact assessment on policies reducing vehicle miles traveled in Oregon metropolitan areas. http://www.upstreampublichealth.org/sites/default/files/HIA%20VMT%20Reduction.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ross, C., Orenstein, M., Botchwey, N. (2014). Recommendations. In: Health Impact Assessment in the United States. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7303-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7303-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7302-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7303-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)