The Analytic Network Process

  • Thomas L. Saaty
  • Luis G. Vargas
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 195)


Analysis to break down a problem into its constituent components to study their behavior has been the major tool of scientific inquiry to test hypotheses and solve problems. It has proven to be extremely successful in dealing with the world of matter and energy. It has enabled man to land on the moon, to harness the energy of the atom, to master global communication, to invent the computer and to produce tens of thousands of useful and not so useful things. But it has not been so effective in the world of man.


  1. Aczel, J. and C. Alsina (1986). “On Synthesis of Judgments.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 20: 333–339.Google Scholar
  2. Aczel, J. and T. L. Saaty (1983). “Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgments.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 27: 93–102.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, C. R., P. K. Pattanaik and M. Salles (1992). “Rationality and Aggregation of Preferences in an Ordinally Fuzzy Framework.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 49: 9–13.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, D. E. (1973). “Social Choice and Intensity of Preference.” Journal of Political Economy 81(1): 211–218.Google Scholar
  5. DeMeyer, F. and C. R. Plott (1971). “A Welfare Function Using “Relative Intensity” of Preference.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 85(1): 179–186.Google Scholar
  6. Goodman, L. A. and H. Markowitz (1952). “Social Welfare Functions Based on Individual Rankings.” American Journal of Sociology 58(3): 257–262.Google Scholar
  7. Hylland, A. (1980). “Aggregation procedure for cardinal preferences: A comment.” Econometrica 48(2): 539–542.Google Scholar
  8. Juola, P. (2008). Summary: FY09 Defense Appropriations Bill, U.S. House of Representatives: Committee on Appropriations.Google Scholar
  9. Kalai, E. and D. Schmeidler (1977). “Aggregation Procedure for Cardinal Preferences: A Formulation and Proof of Samuelson’s Impossibility Conjecture.” Econometrica 45(6): 1431–1438.Google Scholar
  10. Kaneko, M. and K. Nakamura (1979). “The Nash Social Welfare Function.” Econometrica 47(2): 423–436.Google Scholar
  11. Keeney, R. L. (1976). “A Group Preference Axiomatization with Cardinal Utility.” Management Science 23(2): 140–145.Google Scholar
  12. Krantz, D. H., R. D. Luce, P. Suppes and A. Tversky (1971). Foundations of Measurement Vol. I. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Nash, J. (1950). “The Bargaining Problem.” Econometrica 18: 155–162.Google Scholar
  14. Roberts, F. S. (1979). Measurement Theory with Applications to Decisionmaking, Utility and the Social Sciences. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, G.-C. Rota. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  15. Roberts, K. W. S. (1980). “Interpersonal Comparability and Social Choice Theory.” The Review of Economic Studies 27(2): 421–439.Google Scholar
  16. Saaty, T. L. (1977). “A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15: 234–281.Google Scholar
  17. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Saaty, T. L. (2000). Fundamentals of Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh, PA, RWS Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Saaty, T. L. (2001). The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, PA, RWS Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Saaty, T.L., Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, 2005.Google Scholar
  21. Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Network Process (2nd version), 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, 2001. The first version appeared in 1996.Google Scholar
  22. Saaty, T.L., and M.S. Ozdemir, The Encyclicon, RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, 2005.Google Scholar
  23. Saaty, T.L., and L. G. Vargas, Prediction, Projection and Forecasting, Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1991.Google Scholar
  24. Saaty, T.L., and J. Alexander, Conflict Resolution: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Praeger, New York, 1989.Google Scholar
  25. Saaty, T.L., and K. Kearns, Analytical Planning; The Organization of Systems, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1985. Translated to Russian. Paperback edition, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1991.Google Scholar
  26. Saaty, T. L. and L. G. Vargas (2006). Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, F. E. Hillier, Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Samuelson, P. (1967). Arrow’s Mathematical Politics. Human Values and Economic Policy. S. Hook. New York, New Your University Press: 41–51.Google Scholar
  28. SuperDecisions: and download the SuperDecisions software. The installation file is the.exe file in the software folder. The serial number is located in the.doc file that is in the same folder.
  29. Zandi, I. (1975), The Technological Catch and Society, CUE, Chapter 1, 1975.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Katz Graduate School of Business, College of Business AdministrationUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations