Cognition and Place

  • Jeffrey Roy
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 2)

Abstract

Viewed through a bureaucratic prism, a mobile workforce is unwieldy, uncontrollable, and unproductive. Conversely, a central premise of mobility is precisely the opposite—namely that bureaucracy is poorly suited to collaboration and engagement, much as its ethos of control runs counter to today’s imperative of empowerment. An environment of heightened mobility and virtualization necessitates alterations to the intellectual, physical, and organizational dimensions of organizational activity for public servants working within the confines of government. Yet despite a growing online universe and widening virtualization, the importance of geographic proximity remains a central element of socioeconomic development and public sector organization. Such tensions between the traditional patterns of place (and the physicality of both organizational and jurisdictional governance models) and more virtual communications and interactivity are central to tensions between machinery and mobility.

Keywords

Agglomeration Crest Volatility Adapter Ethos 

References

  1. Bent, T., Cumming, D., Osmon, R. K., LeFebvre, J., & Reynolds, S. (2008). Change your world or the world will change you: The future of collaborative government and Web 2.0. Deloitte & Touche LLP.Google Scholar
  2. Cain, S. (2012). Quiet: The power of introverts in a world that can’t stop talking. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  3. Canadian Bankers Association. (2012, November 9). How Canadians bank. Retrieved from Canadian Bankers Association: http://www.cba.ca/en/media-room/50-backgrounders-on-banking-issues/125-technology-and-banking
  4. Carr, N. G. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Carr-West, J. (2009). From e-democracy to ‘here comes everybody’ a short history of government and the internet. In A. Sawford (Ed.), Local government 3.0: How councils can respond to the new web agenda (pp. 4–9). London: Local Government Information Unit.Google Scholar
  6. CBC News. (2012). N.S. civil servants refuse to relocate. Retreived online: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/story/2012/05/11/ns-relocation-refusal-jessome.html
  7. Coe, A., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-governance and smart communities: A social learning challenge. Social Science Computer Review, 19(1), 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dean, D., & Webb, C. (2011). Recovering from information overload. McKinsey Quarterly. Google Scholar
  9. Duxbury, L., & Higgins, C. (2012). Revisiting Work-Life Issues in Canada: The 2012 National Study on Balancing Work and Caregiving in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Carlton University & The University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
  10. Eger, J. M. (2012). The creative community: Meeting the challenges of the new economy. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
  11. Florida, R. (2005). The flight of the creative class: The new global competition for talent. New York: Reed Business Information.Google Scholar
  12. Hamel, G., & Breen, B. (2007). The Future of Management. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hardy, B., Graham, R., Stansall, P., White, A., Harrison, A., Bell, A., et al. (2008). Working beyond walls: The government workplace as an agent of change. London: DEGW/OGC.Google Scholar
  14. HealthForceOntario (2011). Social Media. HealthForceOntario Marketing and Recruitment Agency.Google Scholar
  15. Lake, A. (2011). The smart working handbook. Flexibility Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. LeBlanc, J. (2012). Connecting beyond boundaries. Canadian Government Executive, 17(8)Google Scholar
  17. Lehrer, J. (2012). Imagine: How creativity works. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  18. Lowe, G. (2006). High trust workplaces support service excellence. Canadian Government Executive.Google Scholar
  19. Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (1995). Prosperity through networks: The bottom-up strategy that might have been. In S. Philips (Ed.), How Ottawa spends 1995–96 midlife crises (pp. 137–158). Ottawa, ON: Carleton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Roy, J. (2006). E-government in Canada: Transformation for the digital age (Governance Series). Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  21. Serrat, P. (2010). Social media and the public sector. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  22. Takhteyev, Y., Gruzd, A., & Wellman, B. (2012). Geography of twitter networks. Social Networks, Special issue on Space and Networks, 34(1), 73–81.Google Scholar
  23. United States Office of Personnel Management. (2012). Status of telework in the federal government. Google Scholar
  24. Ware, J., & Grantham, C. (2010). Managing a remote workforce: Proven practices from successful leaders. The Work Design Collaboration, LLCGoogle Scholar
  25. World Economic Forum. (2011). The future of government: Lessons learned from around the World. World Economic Forum: Global Agenda Council on the Future of Government.Google Scholar
  26. Conabree, D. (2011). Intellectual capital and e-collaboration: The hidden cost of the status quo. Fmi Journal, 23(1), 11–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey Roy
    • 1
  1. 1.Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations