Skip to main content

Bureaucracy Versus Mobility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 817 Accesses

Part of the book series: Public Administration and Information Technology ((PAIT,volume 2))

Abstract

New forms of collaborative and open leadership are becoming an imperative as an increasingly networked and online society takes hold. Yet the political contours of political life in a digital world are often centralizing in many respects, constraining the emergence and traction of new forms of leadership and new governance models. Whereas mobility promotes and personifies openness and networks, the political and organizational foundations of the “machinery” of government are secrecy and bureaucracy. Understanding this clash is central to dissecting the challenges faced by the public sector today—a precursor to orchestrating any adaptation that must find ways to refurbish rather than abandon traditional public sector underpinnings with respect to behavioral values and culture and organizational and political structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These sorts of struggles have continued unabated through successive Labour and Coalition Governments cresting with 2011 scandals involving phone-tapping by various media outlets and close relationship between the Murdoch media empire and political officials (leading to a formal public inquiry in 2012).

  2. 2.

    With the exception of Research in Motion, based in Waterloo, Canada, a region known in Canada as Silicon Valley North.

  3. 3.

    http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1499/google-does-it-make-us-stupid-experts-stakeholders-mostly-say-no

References

  • Aucoin, P., Jarvis, M., & Turnbull, L. (2011). Democratizing the constitution: Reforming responsible government. Toronto, ON: Emond Montgomery Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belanger, D., Coe, A., & Roy, J. (2007). Why business models matter. CIO Government Review (July), IT World Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borins, S., Kernaghan, K., Brown, D., Bontis, N., 6, P., & Thompson, F. (2007). Digital State at the Leading Edge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, T. (2012, February 24). Apple gives shareholders more input: Will Facebook get the message? WIRED Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, N. (2008). Is Google making us stupid?

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, I., & Swain, H. (2005). Distinguishing the real from the surreal in management reform: Suggestions for beleaguered administrators in the government of Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 48(4), 453–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutil, P., Howard, C., Langford, J., & Roy, J. (2010). The service state—Rhetoric, reality, and promise (Governance series). Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flumian, M. (2009). Citizens as prosumers: the next frontier of service innovation. Ottawa, ON: nGenera Institute on Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flumian, M., Coe, A. A., & Kernaghan, K. (2007). Transforming service to Canadians: The service Canada model. International Review of Adminstrative Sciences, 73(4), 557–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R., Paquet, G., & Wilson, C. (2012). Stewardship: Collaborative metagovernance and inquiring systems. Ottawa, ON: Invenire Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamarck, E. C. (2002). Applying 21st century government to homeland security. Arlington, VA: PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. (2010). Harperland: The politics of control. Toronto, ON: Penguin Group Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNutt, K. (2009). Citizen engagement through online consultation a comment on public involvement and e-consultation: A new era of democratic governance in Canada. Montreal, QC: IRPP.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNutt, K. A., & Carey, M. (2008). Canadian digital government. Regina: Saskatchewan Institute of Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, A. J. (2011). Networked Coproduction of public services in virtual communities: From a government-centric to a community approach to public service support. Public Administration Review, 7, 598–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paquet, G. (1997). States, communities and markets: The distributed governance scenario. In T. J. Courchene (Ed.), The nation-state in a global information era: Policy challenges the bell Canada papers in economics and public policy (pp. 25–46). Kingston, ON: John Deutsch Institute for the Study of Economic Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquet, G. (2004). There is more to governance than public candelabras: E-governance and Canada’s public service. In L. Oliver & L. Sanders (Eds.), E-government reconsidered: Renewal of governance for the knowledge age. Regina: Canadian Plains Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddick, C. G. (2011). Customer Relationship Management (CRM) technology and organizational change: Evidence for the bureaucratic and e-government paradigms. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 346–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddick, C. G., & Aikins, S. K. (Eds.). (2012). 2.0 technologies and democratic governance: Political, policy and management implications. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddick, C. G., & Roy, J. (2013). Business perceptions and satisfaction with E-government: Findings from a Canadian Survey. Government Information Quarterly (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. (2006). Blacked out—Government secrecy in the information age. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J. (2006). E-government in Canada: Transformation for the digital age (Governance Series). Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J. (2008). Beyond Westminster governance: Bringing politics and public service into the network era. Canadian Public Administration, 5(4), 541–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J. (2010). The rise of networked governance everywhere but in Westminster democracy. Policy options, September, 2010. Montreal, QC: Institute for Research on Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J. (2011). Bridging the great divide: Piliticians and the public. Montreal, QC: IRPP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J. (2012a). Social media’s democratic paradox: Lessons from Canada. European Journal of ePractice, 16, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J. (2012b). E-government & the evolution of service Canada—Transformation or stagnation? In C. G. Reddick (Ed.), Public sector transformation through E-government: Experiences from Europe and North America. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J. (2012c). Secrecy versus openness: Democratic adaptation in a Web 2.0 era. In C. G. Reddick & S. K. Aikins (Eds.), Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance: Political, policy and management implications. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J. (2013). E-government & the evolution of service Canada—Transformation or stagnation? In C. G. Reddick (Ed.), Public sector transformation through E-government: Experiences from Europe and North America. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1971). Beyond the stable state. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (2005). Public value management—A new narrative for networked governance? American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P. (2008). Political Administrative Interface in Canada’s Public Sector. Optimum Online, 38(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Treadwell, J. (2007). Shared Governance and Collaboration. Prepared for EDUCAUSE Australasia 2007—Advancing knowledge pushing boundaries. Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batorski, M., & Hadden, D. (2010) Embracing Government 2.0. Virginia: Grant Thorton. Retrieved from: http://www.grantthornton.com/staticfiles/GTCom/Publicsector/Gov20Jan2010.pdf

  • Friedman T. (2011, October 23) Info technology revolution is taking off big-time. Retrieved from The Daily Advance: http://www.dailyadvance.com/opinion/other-views/thomas-friedman-infotechnology-revolution-taking-big-time-734597

  • Reid, J. (2004). Holding Governments Accountable by Strengthening Access to Information Laws and Information Management Practices. In Oliver, L. and Sanders, L., Eds. (2004) E-Government Reconsidered: Renewal of Governance for the Knowledge Age. Regina: Canadian Plains Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lips, M. (2012). E-government is dead: Long live public adminstration 2.0. Information Polity, 17(2012), 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roy, J. (2013). Bureaucracy Versus Mobility. In: From Machinery to Mobility. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7221-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics