Advertisement

Brainwashing’ as Forensic Evidence

  • James T. Richardson
Chapter

Abstract

“Brainwashing” is an idea first developed for purposes of propaganda in the conflict between the USA and China after the Communists took over China in the early 1950s. In the 1970s the term gained attention in the then “trial of the century” involving Patty Hearst, and it has since become a common term used against unpopular religious movements. The term is now applied in the legal arena to describe any process of influence that is viewed negatively, such as with participation in New Religious Movements (NRMs), sometimes pejoratively labeled as “cults”. Brainwashing explanations were favored over the idea that youth were rejecting America’s cultural values in favor of strange practices from outside the cultural ambit of America. Brainwashing-based claims surfaced in civil suits against NRMS by former members, and they were effective until some major state and federal court decisions undercut such claims. The vast preponderance of the social and behavioral evidence about participation in NRMs does not support brainwashing claims, and such claims do not meet standards of rules of evidence (Frye or Daubert). More mundane explanations that involve time-honored theories from sociology and social psychology adequately explain why people choose to participate in NRMs. However, the brainwashing concept is alive and well within Western (and even Eastern) cultures, and is still being used in various ways within the legal system (such as with Parental Alienation Syndrome), the arguments outlined herein notwithstanding.

Keywords

Federal Court Religious Movement Social Psychological Theory Mental Manipulation Legal Battle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anthony, D. (1990). Religious movements and brainwashing litigation: Evaluating key testimony. In T. Robbins & D. Anthony (Eds.), In Gods we trust (pp. 295–344). New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions Books.Google Scholar
  2. Anthony, D., & Robbins, T. (1992). Law, social science, and the “brainwashing” exception to the first amendment. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthony, D., & Robbins, T. (2004). Pseudoscience versus new religion: An evaluation of the brainwashing theories of Jean-Marie Abgrall. In J. T. Richardson (Ed.), Regulating religion (pp. 127–150). New York: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker, E. (1984). The making of a Moonie: Choice or brainwashing? Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Beckford, J. (1978). Through a looking glass and out the other side: Withdrawal from Reverend Moon’s Unification Church. Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions, 45, 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bromley, D., & Breschel, E. (1992). General population and institutional elite support for social control of new religious movements: Evidence from national survey data. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bromley, D., & Richardson, J. T. (1983). The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy. Hawthorne, NY: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, J. (1979). Cults. Journal of the American Medical Association, 242, 19–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conrad, P., & Schneider, J. (1980). Deviance and medicalization. St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
  10. Dahir, V. B., Richardson, J. T., Ginsburg, G. P., Gatowski, S. I., & Dobbin, S. A. (2005). Judicial application of Daubert to psychological and profile evidence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dawson, L. (1990). Self-affirmation, freedom, and rationality: Theoretically elaborating ‘active’ conversion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dawson, L. (2006). Comprehending cults: The sociology of new religious movements (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Edelman, B., & Richardson, J. T. (2005). Imposed limitations on freedom of religion in China and the margin of appreciation doctrine. Journal of Church and State, 47, 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faigman, D. (1995). The evidentiary status of social science under Daubert: Is it “scientific, technical, or other” knowledge? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 960–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fort, J. (1985). What is “brainwashing” and who says so? In B. Kilbourne (Ed.), Scientific research and new religions: Divergent perspectives (pp. 57–63). San Francisco, CA: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  16. Freckelton, I. (1994). When plight makes right: The forensic abuse syndrome. Criminal Law Journal, 18, 29–49.Google Scholar
  17. Galanter, M. (1980). Psychological induction in the large-group: Findings from a modern religious sect. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 1574–1579.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Galanter, M., & Diamond, C. (1981). “Relief” of psychiatric symptoms in evangelical religious sects. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 26, 495–498.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gatowski, S. I., Dobbin, S. A., Richardson, J. T., Ginsburg, G. P., Merlino, M. L., & Dahir, V. (2001). Asking the gatekeepers: A national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 433–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ginsburg, G., & Richardson, J. T. (1998). Brainwashing evidence in light of Daubert. In H. Reece (Ed.), Law and science (pp. 265–288). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hunter, E. (1951). Brainwashing in Red China. New York: Vanguard.Google Scholar
  22. Kilbourne, B. (1986). Equity or exploitation: The case of the Unification Church. Review of Religious Research, 28, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kilbourne, B. K., & Richardson, J. T. (1984). Psychotherapy and the new religions in a pluralistic society. The American Psychologist, 39, 237–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levine, J., & Russo, E. (1988). Majority and minority influence. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 13–54). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Lewis, J. (1986). Reconstructing the cult experience: Post-involvement attitudes as a function of mode of exit and post-involvement socialization. Sociological Analysis, 46, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewis, J., & Bromley, D. (1987). The cult withdrawal syndrome: A case of misattribution of cause. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 26, 508–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lifton, R. (1963). Thought reform and the psychology of totalism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  28. Lofland, J. (1977). “Becoming a world-saver” revisited. The American Behavioral Scientist, 20, 805–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McGuire, M. (1988). Ritual healing in suburban America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Moreland, R., & Levine, J. (1985). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 143–169). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  31. Reichert, J., Richardson, J. T., & Thomas, R. (2012). Research note on “brainwashing”: Diffusion of a questionable concept in the legal system. Unpublished paper, available from author.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richardson, J. T. (1985a). The active versus passive convert: A paradigm change in conversion/recruitment research. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 24, 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richardson, J. T. (1985b). Psychological and psychiatric studies of new religions. In L. Brown (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of religion (pp. 209–223). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  34. Richardson, J. T. (1991). Cult/brainwashing cases and the freedom of religion. Journal of Church and State, 33, 55–74.Google Scholar
  35. Richardson, J. T. (1992a). Mental health of cult consumers: A legal and scientific controversy. In J. Schumacher (Ed.), Religion and mental health (pp. 233–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Richardson, J. T. (1992b). Public opinion and the tax evasion trial of Reverend Moon. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Richardson, J. T. (1993a). Religiosity as deviance: Use and misuse of the DSM with participants in new religion. Deviant Behavior, 14, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Richardson, J. T. (1993b). A social psychological critique of ‘brainwashing’ claims about recruitment to new religions. In D. Bromley & J. Hadden (Eds.), The handbook on cults and sects in America (pp. 75–97). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  39. Richardson, J. T. (1994). Dramatic changes in America expert evidence law: From Frye to Daubert, with special attention to implications for social and behavioral science evidence. Judicial Review, 2, 13–36.Google Scholar
  40. Richardson, J. T. (1995a). Clinical and personality assessment of participants in new religions. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 5, 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Richardson, J. T. (1995b). Minority religions, religious freedom, and the pan-European political and judicial institutions. Journal of Church and State, 37, 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richardson, J. T. (1996a). “Brainwashing” claims and minority religions outside the United States: Cultural diffusion of a questionable legal concept in the legal arena. Brigham Young University Law Review 873–904.Google Scholar
  43. Richardson, J. T. (1996b). Sociology and the new religions: “Brainwashing”, the courts and religious freedom. In P. Jenkins & S. Kroll-Smith (Eds.), Witnessing for sociology: Sociologists in court (pp. 115–134). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  44. Richardson, J. T. (1998). The accidental expert. Nova Religion, 2, 7–19.Google Scholar
  45. Richardson, J. T., & Edelman, B. (2004). Cult controversies and legal developments concerning new religions in Japan and China. In J. T. Richardson (Ed.), Regulating religion (pp. 359–380). New York: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Richardson, J. T., Ginsburg, G. P., Gatowski, S. A., & Dobbin, S. A. (1995). Problems applying Daubert to psychological syndrome evidence. Judicature, 79, 10–16.Google Scholar
  47. Richardson, J. T., & Introvigne, M. (2001). “Brainwashing” theories in European parliamentary and administrative reports on “cults” and “sect”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Richardson, J. T., van der Lans, J., & Derks, F. (1986). Leaving and Labeling: Voluntary and coerced disaffiliation from religious social movements. In K. Lang & G. Lang (Eds.), Research in social movements, conflicts and change (pp. 97–126). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  49. Richardson, J. T., & Kilbourne, B. (1983). Classical and contemporary applications of brainwashing models: A comparison and critique. In D. Bromley & J. T. Richardson (Eds.), The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy (pp. 29–36). Edwin Mellen: Hawthorne, NY.Google Scholar
  50. Richardson, J. T., & Stewart, M. (2004). Medicalization and regulation of deviant religions: An application of Conrad and Schneider’s model. In J. T. Richardson (Ed.), Regulating religion (pp. 507–534). New York: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robbins, T., & Anthony, D. (1982). Legitimating repression. In D. Bromley & J. T. Richardson (Eds.), The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy (pp. 319–328). New York: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
  52. Robbins, T., & Anthony, D. (1987). Deprogramming, brainwashing, and the medicalization of deviant religious groups. Social Problems, 29, 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schien, E., Schneir, I., & Barker, C. (1961). Coercive persuasion. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  54. Scott, M., & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shapiro, E. (1977). Destructive cultism. American Journal of the Family, 15, 80–83.Google Scholar
  56. Shupe, A., & Bromley, D. (1979). Just a few years seem like a lifetime: A role theory approach to participation in religious movements. In L. Krisberg (Ed.), Research in social movements, conflict, and change (pp. 159–185). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  57. Singer, M. (1979). Coming out of the cults. Psychology Today, 12, 72–82.Google Scholar
  58. Skolnick, J. (1969). The politics of protest. New York: Ballentine Books.Google Scholar
  59. Solomon, T. (1981). Integrating the “Moonie” experience: A survey of ex-members of the Unification Church. In T. Robbins & D. Anthony (Eds.), In Gods we trust (pp. 275–295). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  60. Solomon, T. (1983). Programming and deprogramming the “Moonies”: Social psychology applied. In D. Bromley & J. T. Richardson (Eds.), The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy (pp. 163–182). Hawthorne, NY: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
  61. Straus, R. (1976). Changing oneself and the creative transformation of life experience. In J. Lofland (Ed.), Doing social life (pp. 252–273). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  62. Straus, R. (1979). Religious conversions as a personal and collective accomplishment. Sociological Analysis, 40, 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wright, S. (1987). Leaving cults: The dynamics of disaffection. Washington, DC: Society for the Scientific Study of Religion.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NevadaRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations