Valuing Ecosystem Services Flowing from the Indian Himalayan States for Incorporation into National Accounting

  • S. P. Singh
  • Rajesh Thadani


The degradation of ecosystems has resulted in adverse impacts on 60 % of ecosystems services globally (MEA 2005). This is a matter of great concern as humans heavily depend on these life supporting services (Costanza et al. 1997). While not generally recognized, India is unique among developing countries in having incorporated the value of forest ecosystem services of its states in national accounting. As per the recommendations of the 12th and 13th Finance Commissions of the country, grants are transferred to forest-rich states in amounts corresponding to their forest covers (Singh 2007). However, funds allocated based on forest cover are not an accurate indicator of ecosystem services flowing from these states.


Ecosystem services indicators Valuation Payment 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the extensive comments, suggestions, and inputs of Prof Margaret Skutsch of the University of Twente.


  1. Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2006) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting Units. Resources for the Future, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farberk S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Suttonkk P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Forest Survey of India (FSI) (2011) India state of forest report. FSI, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2003) Good practice guidance for LULUCF. IPCC, c/o Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, JapanGoogle Scholar
  5. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Singh SP (2007) Himalayan forest ecosystem services: incorporating in national accounting. CHEA, NainitalGoogle Scholar
  7. Singh JS, Singh SP (1992) Forests of the Himalaya. Gyanodaya Prakashan, NainitalGoogle Scholar
  8. Skutsch M (ed) (2011) Community forest monitoring for the carbon market: opportunities under REDD. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Skutsch MM, McCall MK, Karky B, Zahabu E, Peters-Gurain G (2009) Case studies on measuring and assessing forest degradation: community measurement of carbon stock change for REDD. FAO, Rome, 2009. Forest resources assessment working paper 156Google Scholar
  10. Tacconi L, Mahanty S, Suich H (2010) Payments for environmental services, forest conservation and climate change: livelihoods in the REDD? Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/NorthamptonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Ecology, Development and Research (CEDAR)DehradunIndia

Personalised recommendations