Skip to main content
Book cover

Casinonomics pp 197–202Cite as

Is Gambling an “Unproductive” Activity?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1295 Accesses

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

Among the criticisms of gambling and the casino industry is the claim that gambling is a waste of time, or worse a “directly unproductive profit-seeking” (DUP) activity. Clearly, gambling is a form of entertainment, like golf, tennis, snow skiing, or watching television and movies. Some gamblers may develop a gambling problem, and we should be concerned with that. But it is inappropriate to classify gambling by professionals, for example, as a wasteful activity.

The material in this chapter is based on Walker DM. 2001. Is professional gambling a directly unproductive profit-seeking (DUP) activity? International Gambling Studies 1: 177–183. Used with permission from Taylor & Francis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Marfels (1998, 416) provides a valid but brief attack on Grinols and Omorov’s interpretation of DUP activities.

  2. 2.

    This passage has been cited or quoted by Grinols (1994b, 8; 1995, 8), Grinols and Mustard (2000, 224), Grinols and Omorov (1996, 50), Kindt (1995, 567; 2001, 19), and Thompson and Schwer (2005, 64).

  3. 3.

    GDP refers to the value of goods and services produced in the economy.

  4. 4.

    For more detailed discussions, see ACIL (1999, 60–61) and Crane (2006).

  5. 5.

    I thank Russell Sobel for these examples.

  6. 6.

    Consider, as another example, an entrepreneur who starts his own business. If the business fails, of course, the investor is not likely to “enjoy” the experience. Is failed entrepreneurship therefore a DUP activity?

  7. 7.

    Tullock (1981, 391, note 2) explains, “Bhagwati is attempting to get the term ‘rent-seeking’ shifted to ‘directly unproductive profit seeking, DUP (pronounced dupe)’. I do not like rent-seeking as a term and would agree that this revision of the language would be an improvement, but I suspect that it is too late to make the change now.”

  8. 8.

    Bhagwati and Srinivasan (1982, 34) also make this point. Bhagwati (1982, 994) and Bhagwati and Srinivasan (1982) explain that in some cases DUP activities may be welfare enhancing.

  9. 9.

    An exception to this would be playing poker at a casino, where players compete against each other rather than against the casino. In some games (e.g., blackjack) one player’s actions can affect other players’ performance. A final exception might be a case in which the casino is filled to capacity so that a given player is unable to place bets.

References

  • ACIL Consulting. 1999. Australia’s gambling industries: A submission to the Productivity Commission’s inquiry into Australia’s gambling industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. 1992. Habits, addictions, and traditions. Kyklos 45(3): 327–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S., and G.N. Becker. 1997. Gambling’s advocates are right—but for the wrong reasons. In The economics of life. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J.N. 1982. Directly unproductive, profit-seeking (DUP) activities. Journal of Political Economy 90: 988–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J.N. 1983. DUP activities and rent seeking. Kyklos 36: 634–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J.N., R.A. Brecher, and T.N. Srinivasan. 1984. DUP activities and economic theory. European Economic Review 24: 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J.N., and T.N. Srinivasan. 1982. The welfare consequences of directly-un-productive profit-seeking (DUP) lobbying activities: Price versus quantity distortions. Journal of International Economics 13: 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Y. 2006. New casinos in the United Kingdom: Costs, benefits and other considerations. Ph.D. Dissertation, Salford Business School, Salford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinols, E.L. 1994a. Bluff or winning hand? Riverboat gambling and regional employment and unemployment. Illinois Business Review 51: 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinols, E.L. 1994b. Testimony and prepared statement. In U.S. House (1995), “The national impact of casino gambling proliferation,” pp. 8–11 and 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinols, E.L. 1995. Gambling as economic policy: Enumerating why losses exceed gains. Illinois Business Review 52: 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinols, E.L. 1997. Email to D. Walker and A. Barnett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinols, E.L. 2004. Gambling in America: Costs and benefits. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grinols, E.L., and D.B. Mustard. 2000. Correspondence: Casino gambling. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14: 223–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinols, E.L., and J.D. Omorov. 1996. Development or dreamfield delusions? Assessing casino gambling’s costs and benefits. Journal of Law and Commerce 16: 49–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatin, G., and R. Smith. 1976. The economics of gambling. In Gambling and society: Interdiscplinary studies on the subject of gambling, ed. W.R. Eadington. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindt, J.W. 1994. The economic impacts of legalized gambling activities. Drake Law Review 43: 51–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindt, J.W. 1995. U.S. national security and the strategic economic base: The business/economic impacts of the legalization of gambling activities. Saint Louis University Law Journal 39: 567–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindt, J.W. 2001. The costs of addicted gamblers: should the states initiate mega-lawsuits similar to the tobacco cases? Managerial and Decision Economics 22: 17–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marfels, C. 1998. Development or dreamfield delusions? Assessing casino gambling’s costs and benefits—A comment on an article by Professors Grinols and Omorov. Gaming Law Review 2(4): 415–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. 2002. E-mail message to D. Walker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. 1976. Economics, 10th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A., and W. Nordhaus. 2001. Economics, 17th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scitovsky, T. 1986. Human desire and economic satisfaction. Washington Square, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W.N., and K. Schwer. 2005. Beyond the limits of recreation: Social costs of gambling in southern Nevada. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management 17: 62–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. 1981. Lobbying and welfare: A comment. Journal of Public Economics 16: 391–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walker, D.M. (2013). Is Gambling an “Unproductive” Activity?. In: Casinonomics. Management for Professionals. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7123-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics