Rebuttal to an Outcome Document

Abstract

Although a model for NGO diplomatic initiatives has been proposed, not every situation is the same; the model won’t always be a perfect choice. In other words, the model is a guideline, not a static approach. Chapters 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 provide case studies of major diplomatic initiatives that used or failed to use some or all of this book’s techniques. Regardless of the model used however, before taking action, NGOs need to gather fact, do a professional analysis, conduct professional negotiating, and report on results in a truthful, clear manner.

When reading these case studies, also keep in mind the many other examples already discussed. The book advises NGOs to try to negotiate the insertion of language into the outcomes documents of conferences, since that creates a moral fulcrum or mandate for future action. But there are times when the outcomes document is so disappointing that NGOs need to join behind a protest statement. While the documents do not have legal standing, if written well and backed by significant public support, that they can be a powerful lobbying tool and thus a fulcrum to enable negotiations.