Advertisement

Engagement as an Individual Trait and Its Relationship to Achievement

  • David J. Shernoff
Chapter
  • 4.5k Downloads
Part of the Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development book series (ARAD)

Abstract

Group differences in engagement have been found by gender as well as race and ethnicity, among other individual-level variables. Studies using the experience sampling method (ESM) in particular have found an “engagement–achievement paradox” in which students from low SES communities and African American students have reported higher levels of engagement in school despite underachieving relative to their peers. This may be attributed, in part, to the decline in engagement white students and those from high SES communities experience when in school compared to the home and public context. Research shows that the obsessive focus on achievement within a culture of competition can have deleterious effects on engagement and authentic interest in learning. Theories of social reproduction postulate that schools, especially their most competitive features, are mechanisms for reproducing class advantage from one generation to the next, thus stabilizing the socioeconomic status quo through time. However, research suggests that a focus on competitive success in school is frequently accompanied by an undermining of meaningful forms of engagement in learning.

Keywords

High School Student Student Engagement Black Student White Student African American Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W., & Downey, D. B. (1998). Assessing the oppositional culture explanation for racial/ethnic differences in school performance. American Sociological Review, 63(4), 536–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Dauber, S. L. (1993). First-grade classroom behavior: Its short- and long-term consequences for school performance. Child Development, 64(3), 801–814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Horsey, C. S. (1997). From first grade forward: Early foundations of high school dropout. Sociology of Education, 70(2), 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “the social psychology of creativity”. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  6. Anderman, E. M., Griesinger, T., & Westerfield, G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  9. Bassi, M., Steca, P., Delle Fave, A., & Caprara, G. V. (2007). Academic self-efficacy beliefs and quality of experience in learning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(3), 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1997). Caring school communities. Educational Psychologist, 32(3), 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bempechat, J., Shernoff, D. J., Li, J., Holloway, S. D., & Arendtsz, A. L. (2010, May). Achievement beliefs and school engagement in low income adolescents: A mixed-methods study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver.Google Scholar
  12. Blau, J. R. (2003). Race in the schools: Perpetuating white dominance? Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  13. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 474–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Butler, R., & Nisan, M. (1986). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(3), 210–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carli, M., Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (1988). The quality of experience in the flow channels: Comparison of Italian and U.S. students. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 288–318). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Condry, J. (1989). The psychology of television. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African-American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Child Development, 65(2), 493–506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Connell, J. P., Halpern-Felsher, B. L., Clifford, E., Crichlow, W., & Usinger, P. (1995). Hanging in there: Behavioral, psychological, and contextual factors affecting whether African-American adolescents stay in high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10(1), 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Conner, J., & Pope, D. (2014). Student Engagement in high performing schools: Relationships to mental and physical health. In D. J. Shernoff & J. Bempechat (Eds.), Engaging youth in schools: Evidence-based models to guide future innovations. New York: NSSE Yearbook by Teachers College Record.Google Scholar
  21. Cooper, H., & Dorr, N. (1995). Race comparisons on need for achievement: A meta-analytic alternative to Graham’s narrative review. Review of Educational Research, 65(4), 483–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  24. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self: A psychology for the third millennium (1st ed.). New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  25. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1998). The development of the person: An experiential perspective on the ontogenesis of psychological complexity. In W. S. E. Damon & R. M. V. E. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Theoretical models of human development 5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 635–684). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Damon, W. (2008). The path to purpose: How young people find their calling in life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Deci, E. L. (1996). Why we do what we do. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  29. Deci, E. L., Betley, G., Kahle, J., Abrams, L., & Porac, J. (1981). When trying to win: Competition and intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Deutsch, M. (1960). The effects of cooperation and competition upon group process. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (pp. 552–576). Evanston: Row, Peterson & Company.Google Scholar
  31. Dewey, J. (1943/1990). The school and society and the child and the curriculum (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Diaz, J. D. (2005). School attachment among Latino youth in rural Minnesota. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27, 300–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Downey, D. B., & Pribesh, S. (2004). When race matters: Teachers’ evaluations of students’ classroom behavior. Sociology of Education, 77(4), 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., et al. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. The American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1017–1095). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Ehrenreich, B. (1990). Fear of falling: The inner life of the middle class. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  37. Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk (p. 117). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  39. Finn, J. D., & Cox, D. (1992). Participation and withdrawal among fourth-grade pupils. American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Finn, C., & Ravitch, D. (Eds.). (2007). Beyond the basics: Achieving a liberal education for all children. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.Google Scholar
  41. Finn, J. D., & Voelkl, K. E. (1993). School characteristics related to student engagement. The Journal of Negro Education, 62(3), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. U. (1986). Black students’, school success: Coping with the “burden of ‘acting white’”. Urban Review, 18(3), 176–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Froh, J. J., Kashdan, T. B., Yurkewicz, C., Fan, J., Allen, J., & Glowacki, J. (2010). The benefits of passion and absorption in activities: Engaged living in adolescents and its role in psychological well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  46. Glanville, J. L., & Wildhagen, T. (2007). The measurement of school engagement: Assessing dimensionality and measurement invariance across race and ethnicity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(6), 1019–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Glasser, W. (1975). Schools without failure. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  48. Graham, S. (1994). Motivation in African Americans. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 55–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harackiewicz, J. M. (1979). The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1352–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Harackiewicz, J. M., & Sansone, C. (1991). Goals and intrinsic motivation: You can get there from here. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  51. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1992). Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hid, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 215–238). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  53. Hunter, J. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). The positive psychology of interested adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(1), 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jagacinski, C. M. (1992). The effects of task involvement and ego involvement on achievement-related cognitions and behaviors. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 307–326). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  55. Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2001). Students’ attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74(4), 318–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. The American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kao, G., & Tienda, M. (1998). Educational aspirations of minority youth. American Journal of Education, 106(3), 349–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kasser, T. (1994). Further dismantling the American dream: Correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic aspirations. Rochester: University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  59. Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  60. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 410–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 280–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kasser, T., Ryan, R. M., Zax, M., & Sameroff, A. J. (1995). The relations of maternal and social environments to late adolescents’ materialistic and prosocial values. Developmental Psychology, 31(6), 907–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Katz, M. B. (1968). The irony of early school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Katznelson, I., & Weir, M. (1985). Schooling for all: Class, race, and the decline of the democratic ideal. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  65. Kelly, S. (2008). Race, social class, and student engagement in middle school English classrooms. Social Science Research, 37(2), 434–448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kelly, S., & Price, H. (2014). Changing patterns of engagement in the transition to high school. In D. J. Shernoff & J. Bempechat (Eds.), Engaging youth in schools: Evidence-based models to guide future innovations. New York: NSSE Yearbook by Teachers College Record. Kogan, M., & Hanney, S. (2000). Reforming higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  67. Kohn, A. (1998). What to look for in a classroom: And other essays (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  68. Kohn, A. (1999). The schools our children deserve: Moving beyond traditional classrooms and “tougher standards”. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  69. Kohn, A. (2000). The case against standardized testing: Raising the scores, ruining the schools. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  70. Larson, S. (2010). The effects of academic literacy instruction on engagement and conceptual understanding of biology in ninth grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Aurora University, Aurora.Google Scholar
  71. Larson, R. W., & Richards, M. H. (1991). Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming students. American Journal of Education, 99, 418–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1993). Effects of school restructuring on the achievement and engagement of middle-grade students. Sociology of Education, 66(3), 164–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement for early secondary school students. Sociology of Education, 68(4), 241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Li, Y., Phelps, E., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M (2009, April). Educational expectations and academic achievement in adolescence: The mediating role of school engagement and intentional self-regulation. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver.Google Scholar
  75. Li, Y., Bebiroglu, N., Phelps, E., Lerner, R. M., & Lerner, J. V. (in press). Out-of-school time activity participation, school engagement, and positive youth development: Findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. Journal of Youth Development.Google Scholar
  76. Lindstrom, L., Ulriksson, L., Arnegard, J., & Brenner, S.-O. (2005). Experience and achievement in secondary schools: An experience sampling method and interview study (pp. 46). Stockholm.Google Scholar
  77. Luthar, S. S. (2003). The culture of affluence: Psychological costs of material wealth. Child Development, 74(6), 1581–1593.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Luthar, S. S., & Becker, B. E. (2002). Privileged but pressured? A study of affluent youth. Child Development, 73(5), 1593–1610.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Luthar, S. S., & D’Avanzo, K. (1999). Contextual factors in substance use: A study of suburban and inner-city adolescents. Development and Psychopathology, 11(4), 845–867.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Malone, T., Little, D., & Cohen, J. S. (2009, July 17). Who had clout? Kids at affluent high schools. Chicago Tribune, 1.Google Scholar
  81. Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 413–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  84. Metz, M. H. (1986/2003). Different by design. The context and character of three magnet schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  85. Mickelson, R. A. (1990). The attitude-achievement paradox among black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63(1), 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Nakamura, J. (1988). Optimal experience and the uses of talent. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 319–326). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Nakamura, J., & Shernoff, D. J. (2009). Good mentoring: Fostering excellent practice in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  89. National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Dropout rates in the United States: 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  90. Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  91. Noddings, N. (2003). Happiness and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 261–290.Google Scholar
  93. Ogbu, J. U. (1978). Minority education and caste: The American system in cross-cultural perspective (p. 431). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  94. Park, S., Holloway, S. D., Arendtsz, A., Bempechat, J., & Li, J. (2010). Predicting emotional engagement in academic tasks among low-income youth. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  95. Pope, D. C. (2001). Doing school: How we are creating a generation of stressed-out, materialistic, and miseducated students. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Rohlen, T. P. (1983). Japan’s high schools. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  97. Rosenholtz, S. J., & Rosenholtz, S. H. (1981). Classroom organization and the perception of ability. Sociology of Education, 54, 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Rotermund, S. (2008, April). Student engagement and achievement in high school: A structural equation model using data from the education longitudinal study of 2002 (ELS 2002). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar
  99. Rothstein, R. (2004). The achievement gap: A broader picture. Educational Leadership, 62(3), 40–43.Google Scholar
  100. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Samson, G. E., Graue, E. M., Weinstein, T., & Walberg, H. J. (1984). Academic and occupational performance: A quantitative synthesis. American Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 311–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sansone, C. (1986). A question of competence: The effects of competence and task feedback on intrinsic interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 918–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  104. Schmidt, J. A., Shernoff, D. J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Individual and situational factors related to the experience of flow in adolescence: A multilevel approach. In A. D. Ong & M. von Dulmen (Eds.), The handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 542–558). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Schneider, B. L., & Stevenson, D. (1999). The ambitious generation: America’s teenagers, motivated but directionless. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merril Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  107. Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  108. Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2005). Regulation of achievement goals: The role of competence feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 320–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Shernoff, D. J. (2010). The experience of student engagement in high school classrooms: Influences and effects on long-term outcomes. Saarbruken: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  110. Shernoff, D. J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000, April). Comparing experiences of school and family across socioeconomic background. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  111. Shernoff, D. J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow in schools: Cultivating engaged learners and optimal learning environments. In R. C. Gilman, E. S. Heubner, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp. 131–145). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  112. Shernoff, D. J., & Hoogstra, L. (2001). Continuing motivation beyond the high school classroom. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 93, 73–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Shernoff, D. J., & Schmidt, J. A. (2008). Further evidence of an engagement–achievement paradox among U.S. High school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(5), 564–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Shernoff, D. J., Knauth, S., & Makris, E. (2000). The quality of classroom experiences. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & B. Schneider (Eds.), Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work (pp. 141–164). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  115. Shih, G. (2009, August 9). Unpaid work, but they pay for privilege. The New York Times, 1 & 18.Google Scholar
  116. Simpson, C. (1981). Classroom structure and the organization of ability. Sociology of Education, 54, 120–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research 1990–2000. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Sirin, S. R., & Rogers-Sirin, L. (2004). Exploring school engagement of middle-class African American adolescents. Youth & Society, 35(3), 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Sirin, S. R., & Rogers-Sirin, L. (2005). Components of school engagement among African American adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 9(1), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: A process model of perceived control and children’s engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Smerdon, B. A. (1999). Engagement and achievement: Differences between African-American and White high school students. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 12, 103–134.Google Scholar
  122. Stanne, M. B., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Does competition enhance or inhibit motor performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 133–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S. M., & Brown, B. B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspective. The American Psychologist, 47(6), 723–729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Steinberg, L., Brown, B. B., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1996). Beyond the classroom: Why school reform has failed and what parents need to do. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  125. Stipek, D. J. (1996). Motivation and instruction. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 85–113). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
  126. Stipek, D. J. (2002). Motivation to learn (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  127. Striegel-Moore, R. H., Silberstein, L. R., & Rodin, J. (1993). The social self in Bulimia Nervosa: Public self-consciousness, social anxiety, and perceived fraudulence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(2), 297–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Thorkildsen, T. A., Golant, C. J., & Richesin, L. D. (2007). Reaping what we sow: Cheating as a mechanism of moral engagement. In E. M. Anderman & T. B. Murdock (Eds.), Psychology of academic cheating (pp. 141–172). San Diego: Elsevier Academic.Google Scholar
  129. Turner, J. E., & Waugh, R. M. (2007). A dynamical systems perspective regarding students' learning processes: Shame reactions and emergent self-organizations. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 125–145). Burlington: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Tyack, D. B. (1974). The one best system. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  131. Tyack, D. B., & Tobin, W. (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Uekawa, K., Borman, K., & Lee, R. (2007). Student engagement in U.S. urban high school mathematics and science classrooms: Findings on social organization, race, and ethnicity. The Urban Review, 39(1), 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Ulriksson, L., Lindstrom, L., & Brenner, S.-O. (n.d.). Engagement and achievement among students in the Swedish secondary school. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  134. van Laar, C. (2000). The paradox of low academic achievement but high self-esteem in African American students: An attributional account. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Vandell, D. L., Shernoff, D. J., Pierce, K. M., Bolt, D. M., Dadisman, K., & Brown, B. B. (2005). Activities, engagement, and emotion in after-school programs (and elsewhere). New Directions for Youth Development, 105, 121–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Vandell, D. L., Pierce, K. M., Brown, B. B., Lee, D., Bolt, D. M., Dadisman, K, et al. (2009, April). A multi-site study of promising after-school programs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.Google Scholar
  137. Voelkl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105(3), 294–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Willis, P. E. (1981). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  140. Willms, J. D. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation: Results from PISA 2000. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  141. Yair, G. (2000). Educational battlefields in America: The tug-of-war over students’ engagement with instruction. Sociology of Education, 73, 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2007). Voices of students on engagement: A report on the 2006 High School Survey of Student Engagement (p. 12). Bloomington: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.Google Scholar
  143. Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2010). Charting the path from engagement to achievement: A report of the 2009 High School Survey of Student Engagement. Bloomington: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.Google Scholar
  144. Zaleski, D. (2009). The effects of competition and cooperation: An independent study (pp. 15). DeKalb.Google Scholar
  145. Zeidner, M. (1991). Test anxiety in educational contexts: Concepts, findings, and future directions. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 165–184). Burlington: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Shernoff
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Leadership, Educational Psychology and Foundations College of EducationNorthern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA

Personalised recommendations