Advertisement

Measuring Student Engagement in High School Classrooms and What We Have Learned

  • David J. Shernoff
Chapter
Part of the Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development book series (ARAD)

Abstract

This chapter explains the methodology undergirding many of the studies on which this book is based. Those studies examine students’ engagement from moment to moment while in educational contexts with the experience sampling method, or ESM. Respondents of these studies carried a paging device (usually a programmable wristwatch), which signals them at random moments throughout the day. Each time they were signaled, they completed a brief questionnaire in which they answered open-ended and scaled questions about the day and time of the signal, their activities and thoughts, as well as the cognitive, affective, and motivational qualities of their experience. To study engagement, my colleagues and I analyzed ESM reports occurring while in schools exclusively, and especially while in classrooms, from the Sloan Study of Youth and Social Development (SSYSD), a nationally representative study conducted at the University of Chicago. On average, high school students report being less engaged while in classrooms than in almost any other setting in which they spend significant time. Students felt significantly more engaged, however, given certain perceptions of both instruction and themselves. Concentration, attentiveness, and overall engagement were significantly enhanced, for example, when instruction was perceived as challenging, relevant, and appropriately challenging and when students perceived themselves to be active, in control, and competent. Students were also significantly more engaged in group and individual work than while listening to a lecture or watching TV or a video. Students in our sample were also significantly more engaged in their nonacademic courses than in their academic ones.

Keywords

High School Student Intrinsic Motivation Student Engagement Cooperative Learning Experience Sampling Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, R., Manoogian, S. T., & Reznick, J. S. (1976). The undermining and enhancing of intrinsic motivation in preschool children. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 34(5), 915–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendtz, A. (2007). Student engagement of lower-income high school students: The importance of autonomy, competence, relatedness, and the balance between challenge and skill. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  4. Bassi, M., & Delle Fave, A. (2004). Adolescence and the changing context of optimal experience in time: Italy 1986–2000. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(2), 155–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bidwell, C. E., & Kasarda, J. D. (1980). Conceptualizing and measuring the effects of school and schooling. American Journal of Education, 88, 401–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biswas-Diener, R., & Dean, B. (2007). Positive psychology coaching: Putting the science of happiness to work for your clients. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Bloom, B. S. (1953). Thought processes in lectures and discussions. Journal of General Education, 7, 160–169.Google Scholar
  8. Brophy, J. E. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18(3), 200–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Cavanagh, R. (n.d.). Applying a unified theory of validity: Identifying evidence for validity arguments in an investigation of student engagement in classroom learning (pp. 16). Perth: Curtin University of Technology.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  12. Coller, B. D., & Shernoff, D. J. (2009). Video game-based education in mechanical engineering: A look at student engagement. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(2), 308–317.Google Scholar
  13. Connell, J. P. (1990). Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life-span. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.), The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp. 61–97). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development (The Minnesota symposium on child psychology, Vol. 23, pp. 43–77). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Covington, M. V. (1985). The motive for self-worth. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Student motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 77–113). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  16. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2001). Flow. Optimal learning environments: Promoting the social, emotional, and intellectual growth of children and adolescents. Presentation given at the workshop, Madison.Google Scholar
  18. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.). (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1984). Being adolescent: Conflict and growth in the teenage years. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Schneider, B. (2000). Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior (Perspectives in social psychology). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  22. Di Bianca, R. (2000). Teaching adolescents: Relationships between features of instruction and student engagement in high school mathematics and science classrooms. Dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognitions (Vol. 3, pp. 139–181). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  24. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75–146). San Fransisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  25. Epstein, J. L., & McPartland, J. M. (1976). The concept and measurement of the quality of school life. American Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk (p. 117). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  28. Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Voelkl, K. E. (1995). Disruptive and inattentive-withdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. Elementary School Journal, 95(5), 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Froh, J. J., Kashdan, T. B., Yurkewicz, C., Fan, J., Allen, J., & Glowacki, J. (2010). The benefits of passion and absorption in activities: Engaged living in adolescents and its role in psychological well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gamoran, A., & Nystrand, M. (1992). Taking students seriously. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 40–61). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. Glanville, J. L., & Wildhagen, T. (2010). The measurement of school engagement: Assessing dimensionality and measurement invariance across race and ethnicity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(6), 1019–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future (A study of schooling in the United States). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  36. Grannis, J. C. (1978). Task engagement and the consistency of pedagogical controls: An ecological study of different structured classroom settings. Curriculum Inquiry, 8, 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  40. Johnson, L. S. (2004). Academic engagement from the perspective of flow theory: A comparative analysis of nontraditional and traditional schools. Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.Google Scholar
  41. Johnson, L. S. (2008). Relationship of instructional methods to student engagement in two public school settings. American Secondary Education, 36(2), 69–87.Google Scholar
  42. Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2001). Students’ attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74(4), 318–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jones, S. E. (2007). Reflections on the lecture: Outmoded medium or instrument of inspiration? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(4), 397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jones, J. N. (2009, April). Mastery learning and student engagement in an alternative learning environment: A mixed methods study of school support and student experiences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.Google Scholar
  45. Kalil, A., & Ziol-Guest, K. M. (2008). Teacher support, school goal structures, and teenage mothers’ school engagement. Youth & Society, 39(4), 524–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kelly, S., & Price, H. (2014). Changing patterns of engagement in the transition to high school. In D. J. Shernoff, & J. Bempechat (Eds.), Engaging youth in schools: Evidence-based models to guide future innovations: An NSSE Yearbook. New York: NSSE Yearbooks by Teachers College Record.Google Scholar
  47. Larson, R. W. (1989). Beeping children and adolescents: A method for studying time use and daily experience. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 18(6), 511–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55(1), 170–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Larson, R. W., & Verma, S. (1999). How children and adolescents spend time across the world: Work, play, and developmental opportunities. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 701–736.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Leone, C. M., & Richards, M. H. (1989). Classwork and homework in early adolescence: The ecology of achievement. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 18(6), 531–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lindstrom, L., Ulriksson, L., Arnegard, J., & Brenner, S.-O. (2005). Experience and achievement in secondary schools: An experience sampling method and interview study (pp. 46). Stockholm.Google Scholar
  53. Mac Iver, D. (1988). Classroom environments and the stratification of pupils’ ability perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mayers, P. L. (1978). Flow in adolescence and its relation to school experience. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  56. Newmann, F. M. (Ed.). (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  57. Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  58. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 261–290.Google Scholar
  60. Olitsky, S. (2007). Promoting student engagement in science: Interaction rituals and the pursuit of a community of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Park, S., Holloway, S. D., Arendtz, A., Bempechat, J., & Li, J. (2011, April). Predicting emotional engagement in academic tasks among low-SES youth: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  62. Patrick, H., Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., & Midgley, C. (2003). How teachers establish psychological environments during the first days of school: Associations with avoidance in mathematics. Teachers College Record, 105(8), 1521–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Peterson, S. E., & Miller, J. A. (2004). Comparing the quality of students’ experience during cooperative learning and large group instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Peterson, P. L., Swing, S., Stark, K., & Waas, G. (1984). Students’ cognitions and time on task during mathematics instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Philippe, F. L., Vallerand, R. J., & Lavign, G. L. (2009). Passion does make a difference in people lives: A look at well-being in passionate and non-passionate individuals. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rathunde, K. (1993). Undivided interest and the growth of talent: A longitudinal study of adolescents. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 22(4), 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rosenholtz, S. J., & Rosenholtz, S. H. (1981). Classroom organization and the perception of ability. Sociology of Education, 54, 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ryan, R. M., & Powelson, C. (1991). Autonomy and relatedness as fundamental to motivation and education. The Journal of Experimental Education, 60(1), 49–66.Google Scholar
  70. Santrock, J. W. (2010). Adolescence (13th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
  71. Schmidt, J. A., Shernoff, D. J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Individual and situational factors related to the experience of flow in adolescence: A multilevel approach. In A. D. Ong & M. von Dulmen (Eds.), The handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 542–558). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Schneider, B., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Knauth, S. (1995). Academic challenge, motivation, and self-esteem: The daily experiences of students in high school. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Restructuring schools: Promising practices and policies (pp. 175–195). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  73. Schunk, D. H., & Meece, J. L. (Eds.). (1992). Student perceptions in the classroom. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  74. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merril Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  75. Shernoff, D. J. (2010). The experience of student engagement in high school classrooms: Influences and effects on long-term outcomes. Saarbruken: Lambert Academic.Google Scholar
  76. Shernoff, D. J., & Kelly, S. (in progress). Predicting engagement from 6th to 12th grade: A longitudinal analysis. DeKalb.Google Scholar
  77. Shernoff, D. J., & Hoogstra, L. (2001). Continuing motivation beyond the high school classroom. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 93, 73–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shernoff, D. J., & Schmidt, J. A. (2008). Further evidence of an engagement-achievement paradox among U.S. High school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 891–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shernoff, D. J., & Vandell, D. L. (2007). Engagement in after-school program activities: Quality of experience from the perspective of participants. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 891–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shernoff, D. J., Knauth, S., & Makris, E. (2000). The quality of classroom experiences. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & B. Schneider (Eds.), Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work (pp. 141–164). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  81. Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shinn, M., & Yoshikawa, H. (Eds.). (2008). Toward positive youth development: Transforming schools and community programs. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2004). The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so you’ll know what you learn! British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 343–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sizer, T. (1984). Horace’s compromise: The dilemma of the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  85. Sizer, T. R. (1992). Horace’s school: Redesigning the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  86. Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: A process model of perceived control and children’s engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Steinberg, L., Brown, B. B., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1996). Beyond the classroom: Why school reform has failed and what parents need to do. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  88. Stipek, D. J. (2002). Good instruction is motivating. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 309–332). San Diego: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Stodolsky, S. S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  90. Stodolsky, S. S., & Grossman, P. L. (1995). The impact of subject matter on curricular activity: An analysis of five academic subjects. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Strati, A. D., Kackar, H. Z., & Schmidt, G. W. (2010, May). The role of ethnicity and challenge in students’ science engagement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Diego.Google Scholar
  92. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom. Responding to the needs of all learners (p. 145). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  93. Ulriksson, L., Lindstrom, L., & Brenner, S.-O. (n.d.). Engagement and achievement among students in the Swedish secondary school. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  94. Voelkl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105(3), 294–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students' motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wu, H.-K., & Huang, Y.-L. (2007). Ninth-grade student engagement in teacher-centered and student-centered technology-enhanced learning environments. Science Education, 91(5), 727–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Shernoff
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Leadership, Educational Psychology and Foundations College of EducationNorthern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA

Personalised recommendations