Innovative Applications of Shared Random Parameter Models for Analyzing Longitudinal Data Subject to Dropout

  • Paul S. AlbertEmail author
  • Rajeshwari Sundaram
  • Alexander C. McLain
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Statistics book series (LNS, volume 211)


Shared random parameter (SRP) models provide a framework for analyzing longitudinal data with missingness. We discuss the basic framework and review the most relevant literature for the case of a single outcome followed longitudinally. We discuss estimation approaches, including an approximate approach which is relatively simple to implement. We then discuss three applications of this framework in novel settings. First, we show how SRP models can be used to make inference about pooled or batched longitudinal data subject to non-ignorable dropout. Second, we show how one of the estimation approaches can be extended for estimating high dimensional longitudinal data subject to dropout. Third, we show how to use jointly model complex menstrual cycle length data and time to pregnancy in order to study the evolution of menstrual cycle length accounting for non-ignorable dropout due to becoming pregnant and to develop a predictor of time-to-pregnancy from repeated menstrual cycle length measurements. These three examples demonstrate the richness of this class of models in applications.


Longitudinal Measurement Menstrual Cycle Length Random Effect Distribution Pattern Mixture Model Informative Dropout 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank the referee and editor for their thoughtful and constructive comments which lead to an improved manuscript. We also thank the audience of the International Symposium in Statistics (ISS) on Longitudinal Data Analysis Subject to Outliers, Measurement Errors, and/or Missing Values. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.


  1. Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.A.: Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover, New York (1972)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert, P.S.: A transition model for longitudinal binary data subject to nonignorable missing data. Biometrics 56, 602–608 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albert, P.S., Follmann, D.A.: Modeling repeated count data subject to informative dropout. Biometrics 56, 667–677 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albert, P.S., Follmann, D.A.: Random effects and latent processes approaches for analyzing binary longitudinal data with missingness: a comparison of approaches using opiate clinical trial data. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 16, 417–439 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Albert, P.S, Follmann, D.A., Wang, S.A., Suh, E.B.: A latent autoregressive model for longitudinal binary data subject to informative missingness. Biometrics 58, 631–642 (2002)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Albert, P.S., Shih, J.H.: On estimating the relationship between longitudinal measurements and time-to-event data using a simple two-stage procedure. Biometrics 66, 983–991 (2010a)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Albert, P.S., Shih, J.H.: An approach for jointly modeling multivariate longitudinal measurements and discrete time-to-event data. Ann. Appl. Stat. 4, 1517–1532 (2010b)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Albert, P.S., Shih, J.H.: Modelling batched Gaussian longitudinal weight data in mice subject to informative dropout. Published on-line before print. Stat. Methods Med. Res. (2011)Google Scholar
  9. DeGruttola, V.T., Tu, X.M.: Modeling progression of CD4-lymphocyte count and its relationship to survival time. Biometrics 50, 1003–1014 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doran, H.C., Lockwood, J.R.: Fitting value-added models in R. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 31, 205–230 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Fieuws, S., Verbeke, G.: Pairwise fitting of mixed models for the joint modelling of multivariate longitudinal profiles. Biometrics 62, 424–431 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Follmann, D., Wu, M.: An approximate generalized linear model with random effects for informative missing data. Biometrics 51, 151–168 (1995)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao, S.: A shared random effect parameter approach for longitudinal dementia data with non-ignorable missing data. Stat. Med. 23, 211–219 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guo, Y., Manatunga, A.K., Chen, S., Marcus, M.: Modeling menstrual cycle length using a mixture distribution. Biostatistics 7, 151–168 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. Hogan, J.W., Laird, N.M.: Model-based approaches to analyzing incomplete longitudinal and failure time data. Stat. Med. 16, 259–272 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laird, N.M., Ware, J.H.: Random -effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38, 963–978 (1982)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Little, R.J.A.: Pattern-Mixture models for multivariate incomplete data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88, 125–134 (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Little, R.J.A.: Modeling the drop-out mechanism in repeated-measures studies. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90, 1112–1121 (1995)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Little, R.J.A., Rubin, D.B.: Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley, New York (1987)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. McLain, A., Lum, K.J., Sundaram, R.: A joint mixed effects dispersion model for menstrual cycle length and time-to-pregnancy. Biometrics 68, 648–656 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Molenberghs, G., Njeru, E., Kenward, M.G., Verbeke, G.: Enriched-data problems and essential non-identifiability. Int. J. Stat. Med. Res. 1, 16–44 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. Mori, M., Woolson, R.F., Woodworth, G.G.: Slope estimation in the presence of informative censoring: modeling the number of observations as a geometric random variable. Biometrics 50, 39–50 (1994)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rubin, D.B.: Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63, 581–592 (1976)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schluchter, M.D.: Methods for the analysis of informative censored longitudinal data. Stat. Med. 11, 1861–1870 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schluchter, M.D., Greene, T., Beck, G.J.: Analysis of change in the presence of informative censoring: application to a longitudinal clinical trial of progressive renal disease. Stat. Med. 20, 989–1007 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sutradhar, B.C., Mallick, T.S.: Modified weights based on generalized inferences in incomplete longitudinal binary models. Can. J. Stat. 38, 217–231 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ten Have, T.R., Pulkstenis, E., Kunselman, A., Landis, J.R.: Mixed effects logistic regression models for longitudinal binary response data with informative dropout. Biometrics 54, 367–383 (1998)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tsiaits, A.A., Davidian, M.: Joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data: an overview. Stat. Sin. 14, 809–834 (2004)Google Scholar
  30. Tsiatis, A.A., Davidian, M.: A semiparametric estimator for the proportional hazards model with longitudinal covariates measured with error. Biometrika 88, 447–459 (2001)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tsiatis, A.A., DeGruttola, V., Wulfsohn, M.S.: Modeling the relationship of survival to longitudinal data measured with error. Applications to survival and CD4 counts in patients with AIDS. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90, 27–37 (1995)Google Scholar
  32. Vonesh, E.F., Greene, T., Schluchter, M.D.: Shared parameter models for the joint analysis of longitudinal data with event times. Stat. Med. 25, 143–163 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wu, M.C., Carroll, R.J.: Estimation and comparison of changes in the presence of informative right censoring by modeling the censoring process. Biometrics 44, 175–188 (1988)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wulfson, M.S., Tsiatis, A.A.: A joint model for survival and longitudinal data measured with error. Biometrics 53, 330–339 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zeger, S.L., Qaqish, B.: Markov regression models for time series: a quasilikelihood approach. Biometrics 44, 1019–1031 (1988)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul S. Albert
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rajeshwari Sundaram
    • 1
  • Alexander C. McLain
    • 2
  1. 1.Eunice Kennedy Shriver, National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.University of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations