Advertisement

Engaging Faculty and Students: A Premise for Excellence in Business Education at Romanian Business School

Chapter
  • 574 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter focuses on explaining the importance of the faculty-student encounter in a business school, with a new paradigm of quality management that combines the classical view of human resources management with modern relationship marketing. Utilizing the Human Sigma model, which is a modern relationship management instrument for measuring and aligning the interest of both customers and service providers, we measured the student-faculty encounter at a small Romanian Business School (RBS) in order to enhance the quality of the education. We begin by discussing the importance of quality in education, then we outline the patterns of engagement, and finally, we present our research findings at the RBS.

Keywords

Educational Service Employee Engagement Customer Engagement Educational Sector Enterprise Engagement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bandyopadhyay JK, Lichtman R (2007) Six sigma approach to quality and productivity improvement in an institution for higher education in the United States. Int J Manage 24(4):802–807Google Scholar
  2. Buckingham M, Coffman C (2005) First, brake all the rules, PocketBooksGoogle Scholar
  3. Datar SM, Garvin DA, Cullen P (2010) Rethinking the MBA: business education at a crossroads. Harvard Business Press, BostanGoogle Scholar
  4. Drucker PF (2005) The essential Peter Drucker, CollinsGoogle Scholar
  5. Fleming JH, Coffman C, Asplund JK (2005) Manage your human sigma. Harvard Bus Rev. July–AugustGoogle Scholar
  6. Fleming J, Asplund J (2007) Human sigma. Gallup Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Gummesson E (2008) Total relationship marketing, 3rd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 36–39Google Scholar
  8. McNay I (2006) Beyond mass higher education: building on experience. Open University Press, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  9. Mruk CJ (2006) Self-esteem research, theory, and practice: toward a positive psychology of self-esteem, Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Olsen SO (2002) Comparative evaluation and the relationship between quality, satisfaction, and repurchase loyalty. J Acad Mark Sci 30(2):240–249Google Scholar
  11. Pompper D (2006) Toward a ‘relationship-centered’ approach to student retention in higher education. Public Relat Q 51(2):29–36Google Scholar
  12. Rath T, Harter J (2010) Wellbeing, the five essential elements. Gallup Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Sawyer RK (2006) The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Scott JC (2006) The mission of the university: medieval to postmodern transformations. J High Educ 77(1):1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sirdeshmukh D, Singh J, Sobol B (2002) Consumer trust, value and loyalty in relational exchanges. J Mark 66:15–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. World Economic Forum and Harvard CID (2002) The global competitiveness report 2001–2002. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ManagementEmanuel University of OradeaOradeaRomania

Personalised recommendations