Skip to main content

Robotic-Assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1731 Accesses

Abstract

Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy has helped advance minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques by extending the candidacy of this procedure, offering patients with more complex pathology the option of having a minimally invasive procedure for their problem. Robotic surgery presents specific challenges and complexities that are unique to this type of surgical procedure. From patient selection to operating room setup and the approach to the procedure, subtle factors can contribute to the efficiency and success of the surgery. This chapter describes the technique of the robotic hysterectomy procedure and outlines details of patient selection criteria, operating room setup, optimization of the operative team, surgical tools, and port placement. The robotic hysterectomy procedure is broken down into segments and tips for approaching difficult hysterectomies, such as those in patients with an extremely enlarged uterus or severe adhesions. Postoperative care is also important in achieving fast recovery and a shorter hospital stay (the main advantage of minimally invasive procedures), so methods of optimizing postoperative care are also addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. JSLS. 2005;9:13–5.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reynolds RK, Advincula AP. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. Am J Surg. 2006;191:55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fiorentino RP, Zepeda MA, Goldstein BH, et al. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13:60–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kho RM, Hilger WS, Hentz JG, et al. Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:113.e1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Payne TN, Dauterive FR. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:589–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen CC, Falcone T. Robotic gynecologic surgery: past, present, future. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52:335–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Orady M, Hrynewych A, Nawfal AK, Wegienka G. Comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches. JSLS. 2012;16:542–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Payne TN, Dauterinve FR. Robotically assisted hysterectomy: 100 cases after the learning curve. J Robot Surg. 2010;4:11–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150:92–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Orady M, Nawfal AK, Wegienka G. Does size matter? The effect of uterine weight on robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy outcomes. J Robot Surg. 2011;5:267–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Payne TN, Dauterive FR, Pitter MC, et al. Robotically assisted hysterectomy in patients with large uteri: outcomes in five community practices. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:535–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nawfal AK, Orady M, Eisenstein D, Wegienka G. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:328–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign cases with complex pathology. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:585–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lenihan Jr JP, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:589–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Klauschie J, Wechter ME, Jacob K, Zanagnolo V, Montero R, Magrina J, Kho R. Use of anti-skid material and patient-positioning to prevent patient shifting during robotic-assisted gynecologic procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:504–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mona Orady .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Orady, M. (2014). Robotic-Assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. In: Escobar, P., Falcone, T. (eds) Atlas of Single-Port, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6840-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6840-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6839-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6840-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics