Advertisement

Narrative-Based Supervision

  • John LaunerEmail author

Abstract

John Launer presents ‘narrative-based supervision’ (NBS) as a method for discussing complex and challenging medical cases with peers and trainees. NBS is part of a comprehensive approach to family medicine developed in the United Kingdom in the last twenty years called narrative-based primary care. Narrative-based primary care regards all conversations with patients or between professionals as collaborations for creating useful patient narratives. Almost every skill that makes for an effective patient encounter is also applicable for colleagues engaging with one another. NBS is used in one-to-one conversations with peers and learners, in small groups, and in large groups with or without facilitators. This chapter describes the origin and principles of narrative-based primary care, their application to clinical encounters, the skills involved (with numerous clinician-patient and clinician-clinician vignettes), and how these skills are used in peer supervision to improve caregiving. The companion chapter is ‘Training in Narrative-Based Supervision: Conversations Inviting Change.’

Keywords

Uterine Cancer Narrative Approach Supervision Group Narrative Medicine Narrative Interview 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  2. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  3. Brody, H. (1994). ‘My story is broken: Can you help me fix it?’ Medical ethics and the joint construction of narrative. Literature and Medicine, 13, 79–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cecchin, G. (1987). Hypothesising, circularity and neutrality revisited: An invitation to curiosity. Family Process, 26, 405–413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charon, R. (2001) The patient–physician relationship. Narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession and trust. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 1897–902.Google Scholar
  7. Charon, R. (2006). Narrative medicine: Honoring the stories of illness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Frank, A. (2001). Experiencing illness through storytelling. In S. Tooms (Ed.), Handbook of phenomenology and medicine. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Gabbay, J., & LeMay, A. (2010). Practice-based evidence for healthcare: Clinical mindlines. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Gergen, K., & Davis, K. (Eds.). (1985). The social construction of the person. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Gergen, K., & McNamee, S. (1992). Therapy as social construction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Gosling, R., & Turquet, P. (1964). The training of general practitioners. In R. Gosling, D. Miller, et al. (Eds.), The use of small groups in training. London: Codicote.Google Scholar
  13. Greenhalgh, T., & Hurwitz, B. (1998). Narrative-based medicine: Dialogue and discourse in clinical practice. London: BMJ Books.Google Scholar
  14. Halpern, H., & McKimm, J. (2010). Supervision. In J. McKimm, & T. Swanwick (Eds.), Clinical teaching made easy. London: Quay Books. http://www.faculty.londondeanery.ac.uk/e-learning/supervision/the-use-of-questions. Accessed 28 Mar 2012.
  15. Harre, R. (1986). The social construction of emotions. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Hunter, K. M. (1991). Doctors’ stories: The narrative structure of medical knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kalitzkus, V., & Matthiessen, P. (2009). Narrative-based medicine: Potential, practice and pitfalls. The Permanente Journal 13, 80–6. http://xnet.kp.org/permanentejournal/winter09/narrativemedicine.html. Accessed 28 Mar 2012.
  18. Launer, J. (1995). A social constructionist approach to family medicine. Family Systems Medicine, 13, 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Launer, J. (1996). ‘You’re the doctor, doctor!’ Is social constructionism a helpful stance in general practice consultations? Journal of Family Therapy, 18, 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Launer, J. (2002). Narrative-based primary care: A practical guide. Abingdon: Radcliffe.Google Scholar
  21. Launer, J. (2006). New stories for old: Narrative-based primary care in the United Kingdom. Family Systems and Health, 24, 336–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Launer, J., & Halpern, H. (2006). Reflective practice and clinical supervision: An approach to promoting clinical supervision among general practitioners. Work Based Learning in Primary Care, 4, 171–173.Google Scholar
  23. Launer, J., & Lindsey, C. (1997). Training for systemic general practice: A new approach from the Tavistock Clinic. The British Journal of General Practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 47, 543–546.Google Scholar
  24. Launer, J., Blake, S., & Daws, D. (2005). Reflecting on reality: Psychotherapists at work in primary care. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  25. London Deanery. Supervision skills for clinical teachers. http://www.faculty.londondeanery.ac.uk/supervisionskills-for-clinical-teachers. Accessed 28 Mar 2012.
  26. Miller, L. (2012). Medical conversations inviting change. Context, 19, 16–19.Google Scholar
  27. Palazzoli, S. M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., et al. (1980). Hypothesising-circularity- neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tomm, K. (1988). Interventive interviewing: Part III. Intending to ask lineal, circular, strategic or reflexive questions? Family Process, 27, 1–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tavistock ClinicLondonUK

Personalised recommendations