Sustainable Universities: Rhetoric Versus Facts

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter summarizes several recent calls for higher education to adopt more sustainable, environmentally friendly practices, policies, and environmental literacy courses. It then reviews nine pledges and scorecards that contain metrics to determine if the university is making progress toward sustainability goals. Most of the scorecards consider only environmental policy, and only two include any social policy recommendations. In addition, cultural systems, specifically the concepts that underpin capitalism and consumerism, are problematic when used to structure both universities and their environmental policy. Specific questions and recommendations with respect to underlying issues are provided to get at whether university policies embrace both social and environmental issues. Higher education needs to address both environmental policy and social policy to achieve genuine sustainability goals.

Keywords

Transportation Income Marketing Expense Dine 

References

  1. Anonymous (2006) What is a sustainable university? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(9): 0–A8Google Scholar
  2. Bruntland G (ed) (1987) Our common future: the world commission on environment and development. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Busch L, Lacy WB (1983) Science, agriculture, and the politics of research. Westview special studies in agriculture science and policy. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  4. Bush GW (2001) The text of president George W. Bush’s address to America before representatives of firemen, law enforcement officers, and postal workers in Atlanta, Ga. on 8 Nov 8 2001. http://www.september11news.com/PresidentBushAtlanta.htm. Accessed Oct 2010
  5. Calder W, Dautremont-Smith J. DATE. Higher education: more and more laboratories for inventing a sustainable future. Chapter 7 in need referenceGoogle Scholar
  6. Centeno MA, Cohen JN (2010) Global capitalism: a sociological perspective. Polity Press, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper MH (2009) Commercialization of the University and problem choice by academic biological scientists. Sci Technol Hum Val 34(5):629–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delucchi M, Korgen K (2002) “We’re the customer-we pay the tuition”: student consumerism among undergraduate sociology majors. Teach Sociol 30(1):100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DiContini VD (2004) Experiential education in a knowledge-based economy: is it time to reexamine the liberal arts? J Gen Educ 53:167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kidd S (and 42 others) (2010) Open letter to sustainability organizations. The letter was sent to Greenopia, National Wildlife Federation, Peterson’s guide, Princeton review, Sierra magazine, Sustainable Endowments Institute, and the US Green Building Council and is published at on the web at: (http://www.aashe.org/forums/open-letter-sustainability-evaluating-organizations)
  11. Lebow V (1955) Price competition in 1955. J Retail, Spring:1–10, 42–44. http://hundredgoals.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/journal-of-retailing.pdf. Accessed Oct 2010
  12. McKibben B (2007) Deep economy: the wealth of communities and the durable future. Times Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L (2007) Categorizing tools for sustainability assessment. Biol Econ 60:498–508Google Scholar
  14. Orr D (1992) Ecological literacy. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  15. Rowe D (2002) Environmental literacy and sustainability as core requirements: success stories and Models. In: Filho WL (ed) Teaching sustainability at Universities. Peter Lang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Schibik TJ, Harrington CF (2004) The outsourcing of classroom instruction in higher education. J High Educ Policy Manag 26(3):393–400. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=t713431525~tab=issueslist~branches=26 – v26Google Scholar
  17. Shiva V (2004) Earth democracy: justice, sustainability, and peace. South End Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Shriberg M (2002) Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: strengths, weaknesses, and implications for practice and theory. High Educ Policy 15:153–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Simnett R, Vanstraelen A, Chua WF (2009) Assurance on sustainable reports: an international comparison. Account Rev 84:937–967Google Scholar
  20. Simpson PM, Siguaw PG (2000) Student evaluations of teaching: an exploratory study of the faculty response. J Market Educ 22(3):199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sojka J, Gupta AK, Deeter-Schmelz DR (2002) Student and faculty perceptions of student evaluations of teaching: a study of similarities and differences. Coll Teach 50(2):33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stewart M (2010) Transforming higher education: a practical plan for integrating sustainability education into the student experience. J Sustain Educ 1 (May 2010) ISSN:2151–7452 (http://journalofsustainabilityeducation.org/)
  23. Uhl C, Kulakowski D, Gerwing J, Brown M, Cochrane M (1996) Sustainability: a touchstone concept for University operations, education, and research. Conserv Biol 10(5):1308–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Women’s StudiesKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Department of Horticulture, Forestry and Recreation ResourcesKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations