Skip to main content

Evolutionary Ethnobotanical Studies of Incipient Domestication of Plants in Mesoamerica

Part of the Ethnobiology book series (EBL)

Abstract

Human cultures that occupied the area currently known as Mesoamerica developed a broad repertory of technologies for managing the biotic resources and ecosystems of the surrounding areas they lived. These technologies emerged from early experiences and had long time, enough for leading to the first forms of agriculture of the New World. Mesoamerica is actually recognized as one of the regions where agriculture and domestication of plants originated, with nearly 10,000 years of antiquity. This chapter summarizes ethnobotanical, ecological, and evolutionary information documented in different regions of Mexico, combining different research approaches in order to understand the human motives for managing plant resources, and the ecological and evolutionary consequences of management of plants and ecosystems. We therefore analyse those processes involving domestication as part of general design of nature according to human needs and desires, occurring at the levels of plant population of particular species, but also at the level of ecosystems and landscapes. We pay particular attention in the analysis of plant species that in the Mesoamerican area have wild and domesticated populations and maintain reproductive interactions. These interactions allow exploring practices and natural processes intervening in conforming populations in which divergence populations guided by natural and artificial selection and other evolutionary forces are occurring. Because natural processes continually weaken the human activities, the divergence is relatively slight and we have therefore called these processes incipient domestication. We analyse the cases of traditional greens called ‘quelites’ such as Anoda cristata and Crotalaria pumila in which people distinguish favourable and unfavourable morphs and practice artificial selection resulting in the abundance of the favourable morphs in areas more intensively managed. Similarly, some examples are analysed of trees (Leucaena esculenta, Crescentia spp. Spondias purpurea, S. mombin, and Sideroxylon palmeri), agaves (Agave inaequidens and A. hookeri), and columnar cacti (Escontria chiotilla, Myrtillocactus schenckii, Pachycereus hollianus, Polaskia spp., Stenocereus spp.). In the cases studied we analysed divergence in morphology, reproduction, population genetics, and germination patterns, among other features, between wild, silvicultural managed and cultivated populations. These case studies allow demonstrating that evolutionary divergence influenced by humans occurs not only under agriculture but also under silvicultural management and we hypothesize that domestication under silvicultural systems could have leaded to the origins of agriculture.

Different disciplines have generated relevant information for answering questions about when, where, and how agriculture and domestication originated. However, the answers about how and why these processes arose continue being motive of intense debate. With the information from our case studies we aspire to contribute elements of ongoing processes of domestication that could provide important examples about how processes could have happened in the past. In addition to their theoretical value, these cases may also contribute to establish important bases of policies for conserving the Mesoamerican biocultural heritage, as well as technological experiences that may be useful for the sustainable management of local resources and ecosystems.

Keywords

  • Mesoamerica
  • Domestication
  • Ethnobotany
  • Incipient domestication
  • Sustainable management

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
EUR   29.95
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6669-7_11
  • Chapter length: 29 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
EUR   213.99
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • ISBN: 978-1-4614-6669-7
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
EUR   274.99
Price includes VAT (Finland)
Hardcover Book
EUR   274.99
Price includes VAT (Finland)
Fig. 11.1
Fig. 11.2
Fig. 11.3
Fig. 11.4
Fig. 11.5
Fig. 11.6
Fig. 11.7
Fig. 11.8
Fig. 11.9
Fig. 11.10
Fig. 11.11
Fig. 11.12
Fig. 11.13

References

  1. Kirchhoff P. Mesoamerica: Sus Límites Geográficos, Composición Étnica y Caracteres Culturales. Acta Americana. 1943;1(1):92–107.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matos-Moctezuma E. Mesoamérica. In: Manzanilla L, López-Luján I, editors. Historia Antigua de México: El México Antiguo, sus Áreas Culturales, los Orígenes y el Horizonte Preclásico. Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. MacNeish RS. A summary of subsistence. In: Byers DS, editor. The prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley: environment and subsistence, vol. 1. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  4. MacNeish RS. The origins of agriculture and settled life. Norman: Oklahoma University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moreno-Calles AI, Casas A, Blancas J, Torres I, Masera O, Caballero J, García-Barrios L, Pérez-Negrón E, Rangel-Landa S. Agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation in arid zones: The case of the Tehuacan Valley, Central Mexico. Agroforest Syst. 2006;80:315–31.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Blancas J, Casas A, Rangel-Landa S, Moreno-Calles A, Torres I, Pérez Negrón E, Solís L, Delgado-Lemus A, Parra F, Arellanes Y, Caballero J, Cortés L, Lira R, Dávila P. Plant management in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico. Econ Bot. 2010;64:287–302.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Blancas J, Casas A, Pérez-Salicrup D, Caballero J, Vega E. Ecological and sociocultural factors influencing plant management in Nahuatl communities of the Tehuacan Valley, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9(1):39.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Vallejo M, Casas A, Blancas J, Moreno-Calles AI, Solís L, Rangel-Landa S, Dávila P, Téllez O. Agroforestry systems in the highlands of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico: indigenous culture and biodiversity conservation. Agroforest Syst. 2014;88(1):125–40.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Villaseñor JL. Diversidad y distribución de las Magnoliophyta de México. Interciencia. 2003;28(3):160–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Rebón-Gallardo MF, Gordillo-Martínez A, Townsend-Peterson A, Berlanga-García H, Sánchez-González LA. Biodiversidad de aves en México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 2014;85:476–95.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Ceballos G, Arroyo-Cabrales J, Medellín R. Mamíferos de México. In: Ceballos G, Simonetti JA, editors. Diversidad y Conservación de los Mamíferos Neotropicales. México: CONABIO-UNAM; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Toledo VM. Biodiversity and indigenous peoples. In: Levin SA, editor. Encyclopedia of biodiversity. San Diego: Academic; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Ávila A. La diversidad lingüística y el conocimiento etnobiológico. In: Sarukhán J, editor. Capital natural de México, Conocimiento actual de la biodiversidad, vol. 1. México: CONABIO; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Casas A, Otero-Arnaiz A, Peréz-Negrón E, Valiente-Banuet A. In situ management and domestication of plants in Mesoamerica. Ann Bot. 2007;100:1101–15.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Boege E. El patrimonio biocultural de los pueblos indígenas de México. México: INAH-CDI; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Caballero J, Casas A, Cortés L, Mapes C. Patrones en el conocimiento, uso y manejo de plantas en pueblos indígenas de México. Estudios Atacameños. 1998;16:181–95.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Casas A, Valiente-Banuet A, Viveros JL, Caballero J. Plant resources of the Tehuacan Valley, Mexico. Econ Bot. 2001;55:129–66.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Lira R, Casas A, Rosas-López R, Paredes-Flores M, Rangel-Landa S, Solís L, Torres I, Dávila P. Traditional knowledge and useful plant richness in the Tehuacan-Cuicatlan, Mexico. Econ Bot. 2009;63:271–87.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Toledo VM, Ordóñez MJ. The biodiversity scenario of México: a review of terrestrial habitats. In: Ramamoorthy TP, Bye R, Lot A, Fa J, editors. Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distribution. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ashworth L, Quesada M, Casas A, Aguilar R, Oyama K. Pollinator-dependent food production in Mexico. Biol Conserv. 2009;142(5):1050–7.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. Darwin C. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray; 1859.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Darwin C. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. London: John Murray; 1868.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Flannery K, editor. Guilá naquitz. New York: Academic; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Harris DR, editor. The origins and spread of agriculture and pastoralism in Eurasia. London: UCL Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Casas A, Vázquez MC, Viveros JL, Caballero J. Plant management among the Nahua and the Mixtec of the Balsas river basin: an ethnobotanical approach to the study of plant domestication. Hum Ecol. 1996;24(4):455–78.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. Casas A, Caballero J, Mapes C, Zárate S. Manejo de la vegetación, domesticación de plantas y origen de la agricultura en Mesoamérica. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México. 1997;61:31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bye RA. Quelites—ethnoecology of edible greens—past, present, and future. J Ethnobiol. 1981;1:109–23.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Camou-Guerrero A, Reyes-García V, Martínez-Ramos M, Casas A. Knowledge and use value of plant species in a Raramuri community: a gender perspective. Hum Ecol. 2008;36:259–72.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  29. Casas A, Viveros JL, Caballero J. Etnobotánica mixteca: sociedad, cultura y recursos naturales en la Montaña de Guerrero. México: Instituto Nacional Indigenista-CONACULTA; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bernal-Ramírez LA. Diferenciación fenotípica en poblaciones de Anoda cristata con diferente grado de manejo [MSc thesis]. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Iztapalapa; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Casas A, Caballero J. Traditional management and morphological variation in Leucaena esculenta (Moc. et Sessé ex A.DC.) Benth. in the Mixtec region of Guerrero, Mexico. Econ Bot. 1996;50(2):167–81.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  32. Zárate S, Pérez-Nasser N, Casas A. Genetics of wild and managed populations of Leucaena esculenta subsp. esculenta (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae) in La Montaña of Guerrero, Mexico. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2005;52:941–57.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  33. González-Soberanis C, Casas A. Traditional management and domestication of tempesquistle, Sideroxylon palmeri (Sapotaceae) in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Central Mexico. J Arid Environ. 2004;59(2):245–58.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith CE. Plant Remains. In: Byers DS, editor. The prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, vol. 5. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Avendaño A, Casas A, Dávila P, Lira R. Traditional use, management and commercialization of “pochote” Ceiba aesculifolia (H. B. & K.) Btitten & Baker subsp. parvifolia (Rose) P. E. Gibbs & Semir (Bombacaceae) in the Tehuacán Valley, Central Mexico. J Arid Environ. 2006;67:15–35.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  36. Avendaño A, Casas A, Dávila P, Lira R. In situ management and patterns of morphological variation of Ceiba aesculifolia subsp. parvifolia in the Tehuacán Valley. Econ Bot. 2009;63(2):138–51.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  37. Arellanes Y, Casas A, Arellanes A, Vega E, Blancas J, Vallejo M, Torres I, Rangel-Landa S, Moreno-Calles AI, Solís L, Pérez-Negrón E. Influence of traditional markets on plant management in the Tehuacan Valley. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9(1):38.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Eguiarte LE, Souza V, Silva A. Evolución de la familia Agavaceae, filogenia, biología reproductiva y genética de poblaciones. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México. 2000;66:131–50.

    Google Scholar 

  39. García-Mendoza A. Distribution of Agave (Agavaceae) in Mexico. Cact Succ J. 2002;74(4): 177–87.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Callen EO. Food habits of some Pre-Columbian Mexican Indians. Econ Bot. 1967;19(4):335–43.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  41. Colunga-GarcíaMarín P, Zizumbo-Villarreal D. Tequila and other Agave spirits from west-central Mexico: current germplasm diversity, conservation and origin. Biodivers Conserv. 2007;16:1653–67.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  42. Colunga-GarcíaMarín P, Estrada-Loera E, May-Pat F. Patterns of morphological variation, diversity, and domestication of wild and cultivated populations of Agave in Yucatan, Mexico. Am J Bot. 1996;83(8):1069–82.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  43. Colunga-GarcíaMarín P, May-Pat F. Morphological variation of henequen (Agave fourcroydes, Agavaceae) germplasm and its wild ancestor (A. angustifolia) under uniform growth conditions: diversity and domestication. Am J Bot. 1997;84(11):1449–65.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vargas-Ponce O, Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Colunga-GarcíaMarín P. In situ diversity and maintenance of traditional Agave landraces used in spirits production in West-Central Mexico. Econ Bot. 2007;61(4):362–75.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  45. Vargas-Ponce O, Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Martínez-Castillo J, Coello-Coello J, Colunga-GarcíaMarín P. Diversity and structure of landraces of Agave grown for spirits under traditional agriculture: a comparison with wild populations of A. angustifolia (Agavaceae) and commercial plantations of A. tequilana. Am J Bot. 2009;96:448–57.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rodríguez-Garay B, Lomelí-Sención JA, Tapia-Campos E, Gutiérrez-Mora A, García-Galindo J, Rodríguez-Domínguez JM, Urbina-López D, Vicente-Ramírez I. Morphological and molecular diversity of Agave tequilana Weber var. Azul and Agave angustifolia Haw. var. Lineño. Ind Crops Prod. 2009;29:220–8.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  47. Zizumbo-Villareal D, Vargas-Ponce O, Rosales-Adame JJ, Colunga-GarcíaMarín P. Sustainability of the traditional management of Agave genetic resources in the elaboration of mezcal and tequila spirits in western Mexico. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2013;60(1):33–47.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  48. Mora-López JL, Reyes-Agüero JA, Flores-Flores JL, Peña-Valdivia CB, Aguirre-Rivera JA. Morphological variation and humanization of Agave genus, Salmianae section. Agrociencia. 2011;45(4):465–77.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Parker KC, Trapnell DW, Hamrick JL, Hodgson WC, Parker AJ. Inferring ancient Agave cultivation practices from contemporary genetic patterns. Mol Ecol. 2010;19:622–1637.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  50. Parker KC, Trapnell DW, Hamrick JL, Hodgson WC. Genetic and morphological contrasts between wild and anthropogenic populations of Agave parryi var. huachucensis in south-eastern Arizona. Ann Bot. 2014;113(6):939–52.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Gentry HS. Agaves of continental North America. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Valenzuela-Zapata AG, Lopez-Muraira I, Gaytán MS. Traditional Knowledge, Agave Inaequidens (Koch) Conservation, and the Charro Lariat Artisans of San Miguel Cuyutlán, Mexico. Ethnobiol Lett. 2011;2:72–80.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  53. Lindsay DL, Edwards CE, Jung MG, Bailey P, Lance RF. Novel microsatellite loci for Agave parryi and cross-amplification in Agave palmeri (Agavaceae). Am J Bot. 2012;99(7):e295–7.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Eguiarte LE, Aguirre-Planter E, Aguirre X, Colín R, González A, Rocha M, Scheinvar E, Trejo L, Souza V. From isozymes to genomics: population genetics and conservation of Agave in México. Bot Rev. 2013;79(4):483–506.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  55. Casas A, Caballero J, Valiente-Banuet A. Use, management and domestication of columnar cacti in south-central Mexico: a historical perspective. J Ethnobiol. 1999;19(1):71–95.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Parra F, Casas A, Peñaloza-Ramírez JM, Cortés-Palomec A, Rocha-Ramírez V, González-Rodríguez A. Process of domestication of Stenocereus pruinosus (Cactaceae) in the Tehuacán Valley, Central Mexico. Ann Bot. 2010;106:483–96.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Arias-Cóyotl E, Stoner KE, Casas A. Effectiveness of bats as pollinators of Stenocereus stellatus (Cactaceae) in wild, managed in situ, and cultivated populations in La Mixteca Baja, central Mexico. Am J Bot. 2006;93(11):1675–83.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Guillén S, Benítez J, Martínez-Ramos M, Casas A. Seed germination of wild, in situ-managed, and cultivated populations of columnar cacti in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico. J Arid Environ. 2009;73(4–5):407–13.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  59. Guillén S, Terrazas T, De la Barrera E, Casas A. Germination differentiation patterns of wild and domesticated columnar cacti in a gradient of artificial selection intensity. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2010;58(3):409–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  60. Guillen S, Casas A, Terrazas T, Vega E, Martinez-Palacios M. Differential survival and growth of wild and cultivated seedlings of columnar cacti: consequences of domestication. Am J Bot. 2013;100(12):2364–9.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Machado de Freitas E, Peroni N, Casas A, Parra F, Aguirre X, Guillén S, Albuquerque U. Brazilian and Mexican experiences in the study of incipient domestication. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10:33.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the DGAPA, UNAM (projects IN205111-3 and IN209214), and the CONACYT (projects CB-2008-01-103551 and CB-2013-01-221800), Mexico for their financial support. We also thank Edgar Pérez Negrón, Heberto Ferreira, and Alberto Valencia for field assistance and computer work. We especially thank the kindness and generosity of the peoples of the regions we have worked and that have shared their valuable knowledge and have permitted our work in their land.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Casas Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Casas, A. et al. (2016). Evolutionary Ethnobotanical Studies of Incipient Domestication of Plants in Mesoamerica. In: Lira, R., Casas, A., Blancas, J. (eds) Ethnobotany of Mexico. Ethnobiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6669-7_11

Download citation