Skip to main content

Collateral Consequences: The Impact of Local Immigration Policies on Latino Immigrant Families in North Central Indiana

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Outside Justice

Abstract

Concern over immigration has culminated in unprecedented legislative action at the local level, in particular state level legislation has begun to increasingly target immigrants and penalize immigration violations (Chavez and Provine, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 623:78–92, 2009; Hegen, State legislation related to immigrants and immigration: January 1–June 30, 2008). The present study examines the effect of state level immigration legislation on immigrant Latino families at a time of high immigration, when immigrants are settling into locations which have not historically had immigrant populations, and during an extended economic recession (Mather, Children in immigrant families chart new path: Reports on America, 2009; US Bureau of Economic Analysis, Economic downturn widespread among states in 2009: Advanced 2009 and revised 1963–2008 GDP-By-state statistics, 2010; US Department of Homeland Security, Secretary Napolitano announces deferred action process for young people who are low enforcement priorities, 2012). Immigrant families today are likely to differ from those of the past in that they are more likely to be from Latin America or the Caribbean and include unprecedented numbers of unauthorized immigrants (Passel and Cohn, Unauthorized immigrant population: National and state trends, 2010, 2011; US Department of Homeland Security, Secretary Napolitano announces deferred action process for young people who are low enforcement priorities, 2012). The present study draws on interviews with 40 families from an emerging immigrant destination in North Central Indiana to help illuminate the ways in which local legislation and enforcement impacts immigrant Latino families. Results illustrate how state level immigration legislation can create barriers and challenges for immigrant Latino families, with authorized and unauthorized status alike. This study also finds that many immigrant Latino families are “mixed status families,” where a family consists of both authorized and unauthorized immigrant status family members, and thus share the plight of unauthorized family members. Due to this “mixed status family” status, many families experience the collateral consequences of state level legislation, including family stress and uncertainty in the form of family level “liminal legality,” escalated intergenerational tension, and increased social isolation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term “unauthorized” is used here over “illegal” or “undocumented” following Passel (2007).

  2. 2.

    That is, Alabama House Bill 19 which eliminates certified naturalization documentation as an acceptable form of voter identification and instead requires a government issued photo identification from a state or territory.

  3. 3.

    Arizona et al., Petitioners v. United States, 567 U. S. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-182b5e1.pdf.

References

  • Alba, R., Rumbaut, R. G., & Marotz, K. (2005). A distorted nation: Perceptions of racial/ethnic group sizes and attitudes toward immigrants and other minorities. Social Forces, 95, 901–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacallao, M. L., & Smokowski, P. R. (2007). The cost of getting ahead: Mexican family system changes after immigration. Family Relations, 56, 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betancur, J. J. (1996). The settlement experience of Latinos in Chicago: Segregation, speculation, and the ecology model. Social Forces, 74(4), 1299–1324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui, H. N., & Thingniramol, O. (2005). Immigration and self-reported delinquency: The interplay of immigrant generations, gender, race, and ethnicity. Journal of Crime and Justice, 28, 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, K. F., & Piehl, A. M. (1998). Recent immigrants: Unexpected implications for crime and incarceration. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 51, 654–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calavita, K. (1996). The new politics of immigration: “Balanced-budget conservatism” and the symbolism of proposition 187. Social Problems, 43, 284–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cave, D. (2008, June 9). States take new tack on illegal immigration. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, C. R., & Tsai, Y. (2001). Social factors influencing immigration attitudes: An analysis of data from the general social survey. The Social Science Journal, 38, 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, J. M., & Griffiths, E. (2009). Neighborhood dynamics of urban violence: Understanding the immigration connection. Homicide Studies, 13(3), 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, Lopez, A., Englebrecht, C. M., & Viramontez Anguiano, R. P. (2012). Sufren los Niños: Exploring the Impact of unauthorized Immigration Status on Children’s Well-being. Family Court Review, 50(4), 638–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, J. M., & Provine, D. M. (2009). Race and the response of state legislatures to unauthorized immigrants. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 623, 78–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Gaitan, C. (1992). School matters in the Mexican-American home: Socializing children to education. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 495–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone, M., & Looney, A. (2010). Ten economic facts about immigration. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2010/09/immigration-greenstone-looney

  • Guzman, J. C., Jara, R., & Armet S. (2011). In J. R. Reyes & J. C. Guzman (Eds.), Latinos in North Central Indiana: A demographic profile (Vol. 1). Goshen: Goshen College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J., Levi, R., & Dinovitzer, R. (2008). The symbolic violence of the crime-immigration nexus: Migrant mythologies in the Americas. Criminology and Public Policy, 7, 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J., & Palloni, A. (1999). Sociological criminology and the mythology of Hispanic immigration and crime. Social Problems, 46, 617–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J. M., Rodriguez, N., & Castro, B. (2011). Social effects of mass deportations by the United States government, 2000-10. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(8), 1374–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegen, D. (2008). State legislation related to immigrants and immigration: January 1June 30, 2008. Washington, DC: Immigrant Policy Project, National Conference of State Legislatures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, D. (2004). Demographic changes and the life circumstances of immigrant families. The Future of Children, 14(2), 17–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, R., Jr. (2002). Latino homicide: Immigration, violence, and community. New York: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, M. (2009). Children in immigrant families chart new path: Reports on America. Washington, DC: Populations Reference Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menjívar, C. (2006). Liminal legality: Salvadoran and Guatemalan immigrants’ lives in the United States. The American Journal of Sociology, 111, 999–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B., Segreto, J., Carter, A., & Morse, A. (2012). 2011 Immigration-related laws and resolutions in the states (Jan. 1–Dec. 7, 2011). National Council of State Legislatures. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/documents/immig/2011ImmFinalReportDec.pdf

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, A., Carter, A., Lawrence, M., & Segreto, J. (2012) State omnibus legislation and legal challenges. National Conference of State Legislatures. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/immig/omnibus-immigration-legislation.aspx

  • Nuñez-Neto, B. (2008). Border security: The role of the U.S. border patrol. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, CRS Report RL32562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuñez-Neto, B., Garcia, M. J., & Ester, K. (2007). Enforcing immigration law: The role of state and local law enforcement. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, CRS Report RL32270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortman, J. M., & Guarneri, C. E. (2009). United States population projections: 2000 to 2050. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/analytical-document09.pdf

  • Passel, J. S. (2007). Unauthorized migrants in the United States: Estimates, methods, and characteristics. Social, Employment, and Migration Working Papers No. 57. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. (2011). Unauthorized immigrant population: National and state trends, 2010. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passel, J. S., Cohn, D., & Lopez, M. H. (2011). Census 2010: 50 million Latinos; Hispanics account for more than half of nation’s growth in past decade. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passel, J. S., & Taylor, P. (2010). Unauthorized immigrants and their U.S.-born children. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., Fernández-Kelly, P., & Light, D. (2012). Life on the edge: Immigrants confront the American health system. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530, 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan, S. K., & Wong, T. (2007). Immigration policies go local: The varying responses of local governments to undocumented immigration. Unpublished paper, University of California, Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, L. W., Weiss, H. E., Adelman, R. M., & Jaret, C. (2005). The immigration-crime relationship: Evidence across U.S. metropolitan areas. Social Science Research, 34, 757–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, M. (2006). Racial profiling and immigration law enforcement: Rounding up of usual suspects in the Latino community. Critical Sociology, 32, 447–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaut, R. G., & Ewing, W. A. (2007). The myth of immigrant criminality and the paradox of assimilation: Incarceration rates among native and foreign-born men. Washington, DC: Immigration Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2008). Rethinking crime and immigration. Contexts, 7, 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, M. K., & Behrman, R. E. (2004). Children of immigrant families: Analysis and recommendations. The Future of Children, 14(2), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A. (2004). The rise of new immigrant gateways. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez-Orozco, C., Yoshikawa, H., Teranishi, R. T., & Suarez-Orozco, M. M. (2011). Growing up in the shadows: The developmental implications of unauthorized status. Harvard Educational Review, 81(3), 438–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2010). Economic downturn widespread among states in 2009: Advanced 2009 and revised 19632008 GDP-By-state statistics. News release. Retrieved from http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/regional/gdp_state/2010/pdf/gsp1110.pdf

  • U. S. Census Bureau. (2009). American community survey: Detailed tables (Table showing demographics of families in the United States). Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/home

  • U. S. Census Bureau. (2010). Profile America: Facts for the features. Hispanic heritage month 2010: Sept. 15Oct.15. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/cb10-ff17.html

  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2011). Yearbook of Immigration Statistics: 2010. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2012). Secretary Napolitano announces deferred action process for young people who are low enforcement priorities. Retrieved from http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/releases/20120612-napolitano-announces-deferred-action-process-for-young-people.shtm

  • U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (2012). Activated jurisdictions. Retrieved from http://www.ice.gov/doclib/secure-communities/pdf/sc-activated1.pdf

  • Vandenack, T. (2011). Some wonder if lack of Elkhart jobs linked to illegals. Indiana Economic Digest. Retrieved from http://www.indianaeconomicdigest.net

  • Viramontez Anguiano, R. P., & Lopez, A. (2012). El miedo y el hambre: Understanding the familial, social, and educational realities of undocumented Latino families in North Central Indiana. Journal of Family Social Work, 15(4), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. (1997). Complaints against the police: A focus group study of citizens perceptions, goals, and expectations. Criminal Justice Review, 22(2), 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S., Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. (1996). The color of justice: race, ethnicity, and crime in America. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, K., Payne, A. A., Chiricos, T., & Gertz, M. (2011). The typification of Hispanics as criminals and support for punitive crime control policies. Social Science Research, 40, 822–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge M. Chavez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chavez, J.M., Englebrecht, C.M., Lopez, A., Anguiano, R.P.V., Reyes, J.R. (2013). Collateral Consequences: The Impact of Local Immigration Policies on Latino Immigrant Families in North Central Indiana. In: Brotherton, D., Stageman, D., Leyro, S. (eds) Outside Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6648-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics