Skip to main content

Detection of Structural Damage Through Nonlinear Identification by Using Modal Testing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Topics in Modal Analysis, Volume 7

Abstract

Structural damages usually introduce nonlinearity to the system. A previously developed nonlinear identification method is employed to detect crack type structural damage. The method requires the measurement of FRFs at various points in order to locate the damage. The method makes it also possible to determine the extent of damage by identifying the level of nonlinearity. The verification of the method is demonstrated with experimental case studies using beams with different levels of cracks. The approach proposed in this study is very promising to be used in practical systems, but still open to further improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adams DE (2007) Health monitoring of structural materials and components. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  2. Salawu OS (1997) Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review. Eng Struct 19(9):718–723

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pandey AK, Biswas M, Samman MM (1991) Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes. J Sound Vib 145(2):321–332

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ratcliffe CP (1997) Damage detection using a modified Laplacian operator on mode shape data. J Sound Vib 204(3):505–517

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maia NMM, Silva JMM, Almas EAM (2003) Damage detection in structures: from mode shape to frequency response function methods. Mech Syst Signal Process 17(3):489–498

    Google Scholar 

  6. Whalen TM (2008) The behavior of higher order mode shape derivatives in damaged beam-like structures. J Sound Vib 309(3–5):426–464

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yan YJ, Cheng L, Wu ZY, Yam LH (2007) Development in vibration-based structural damage detection technique. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:2198–2211

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huynh D, He J, Tran D (2005) Damage location vector: a non-destructive structural damage detection technique. Comput Struct 83:2353–2367

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rizos DD, Fassois SD, Marioli-Riga ZP, Karanika AN (2008) Vibration-based skin damage statistical detection and restoration assessment in a stiffened aircraft panel. Mech Syst Signal Process 22:3151–3337

    Google Scholar 

  10. Radzienski M, Krawczuk M, Palacz M (2011) Improvement of damage detection methods based on experimental modal parameters. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:2169–2190

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang J, Qiao P (2008) On irregularity-based damage detection method for cracked beams. Solids Struct 45:688–704

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huang Q, Gardoni P, Hurlebaus S (2012) A probabilistic damage detection approach using vibration-based nondestructive testing. Struct Saf 38:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  13. Qiao P, Lu K, Lestari W, Wang J (2007) Curvature mode shape-based damage detection in composite laminated plates. Compos Struct 80: 409–428

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xiang J, Liang M (2012) A two-step approach to multi-damage detection for plate structures. Eng Fract Mech 91:73–86

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wu N, Wang Q (2011) Experimental studies on damage detection of beam structures with wavelet transform. Int J Eng Sci 49:253–261

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fan W, Qiao P (2009) A 2-D continuous wavelet transform of mode shape data for damage detection of plate structures. Int J Solids Struct 46:4379–4395

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bakhary N, Hao H, Deeks AJ (2007) Damage detection using artificial neural network with consideration of uncertainties. Eng Struct 29: 2806–2815

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yu L, Cheng L, Yam LH, Yan YJ, Jiang JS (2007) Experimental validation of vibration-based damage detection for static laminated composite shells partially filled with fluid. Compos Struct 79:288–299

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nichols JM, Seaver M, Trickey ST, Todd MD, Olson C, Overbey L (2005) Detecting nonlinearity in structural systems using the transfer entropy. Phys Rev E 72:046217

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lang ZQ, Park G, Farrar CR, Todd MD, Mao Z, Zhao L, Worden K (2011) Transmissibility of non-linear output frequency response functions with application in detection and location of damage in MDOF structural systems. Int J Non Linear Mech 46:841–853

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peng ZK, Lang ZQ, Wolters C, Billings SA, Worden K (2011) Feasibility study of structural damage detection using NARMAX modeling of Nonlinear Output Frequency Response Function based analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:1045–1061

    Google Scholar 

  22. Andreaus U, Baragatti P (2012) Experimental damage detection of cracked beams by using nonlinear characteristics of forced response. Mech Syst Signal Process 31:382–404

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eftekhari SA, Bakhtiari-Nejad F, Dowell EH (2011) Bifurcation boundary analysis as a nonlinear damage detection feature: does it work? J Fluids Struct 27:297–310

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aydoǧan MÖ (2003) Damage detection in structures using vibration measurements. MSc thesis in Mechanical engineering, Middle East Technical University, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  25. Özer MB, Özgüven HN (2002) A new method for localization and identification of nonlinearities in structures. In: Proceedings of the ESDA2002: 6th biennial conference on engineering systems design and analysis, stanbul, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  26. Özer MB, Özgüven HN, Royston TJ (2009) Identification of structural non-linearities using describing functions and the Sherman–Morrison method. Mech Syst Signal Process 23:30–44

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tanrıkulu Ö, Kuran B, Özgüven HN, mregun M (1993) Forced harmonic response analysis of non-linear structures. AIAA J 31:1313–1320

    Google Scholar 

  28. Aykan M, Özgüven HN (2012) Parametric identification of nonlinearity from incomplete FRF data using describing function inversion. In: Proceedings of the SEM IMAC XXX conference, vol 3, Jacsonville, FL

    Google Scholar 

  29. Arslan Ö, Aykan M, Özgüven HN (2011) Parametric identification of structural nonlinearities from measured frequency response data. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:1112–1125

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Aykan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Society for Experimental Mechanics

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aykan, M., Özgüven, H.N. (2014). Detection of Structural Damage Through Nonlinear Identification by Using Modal Testing. In: Allemang, R., De Clerck, J., Niezrecki, C., Wicks, A. (eds) Topics in Modal Analysis, Volume 7. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6585-0_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6585-0_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6584-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6585-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics