Geometrically Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Piezoelectric Integrated Thin-Walled Smart Structures

Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

In this work, a fully geometrically nonlinear dynamic finite element (FE) model, which considers the kinematics of small strains but large rotations, is developed for transient analysis of piezolaminated thin-walled structures based on first-order shear deformation (FOSD) hypothesis. Linear electro-mechanically coupled constitutive equations and the assumption of linearly distributed electric potential through the thickness of the piezoelectric layers are employed. An eight-node quadrilateral plate/shell element with five mechanical degrees of freedom (DOFs) per node and one electrical DOF per smart layer is adopted in the finite element formulation. The second order differential dynamic equation is solved by the central difference algorithm. The mathematical method is validated by transient analysis of three different examples of a beam, a plate, and a cylindrical shell. The results illustrate that the geometrical nonlinearity affects the structural dynamic responses significantly.

Keywords

Geometrically nonlinear Large rotation Smart structure Piezoelectric Dynamic analysis 

References

  1. Balamurugan V, Narayanan S (2001) Shell finite element for smart piezoelectric composite plate/shell structures and its application to the study of active vibration control. Finite Elem Anal Des 37:713–738Google Scholar
  2. Cen S, Soh AK, Long YQ, Yao ZH (2002) A new 4-node quadrilateral FE model with variable electrical degrees of freedom for the analysis of piezoelectric laminated composite plates. Compos Struct 58:583–599Google Scholar
  3. Chróscielewski J, Klosowski P, Schmidt R (1997) Numerical simulation of geometrically nonlinear flexible beam control via piezoelectric layers. ZAMM Suppl 1:S69–S70Google Scholar
  4. Chróscielewski J, Klosowski P, Schmidt R (1998) Theory and numerical simulation of nonlinear vibration control of arches with piezoelectric distributed actuators. 13. Mach Dyn Probl 20:73–90Google Scholar
  5. Correia IFP, Soares CMM, Soares CAM, Herskovits J (2002) Active control of axisymmetric shells with piezoelectric layers: a mixed laminated theory with a high order displacement field. Comput Struct 80:2265–2275Google Scholar
  6. Correia VMF, Gomes MAA, Suleman A, Soares CMM, Soares CAM (2000) Modelling and design of adaptive composite structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 185:325–346Google Scholar
  7. Dash P, Singh BN (2009) Nonlinear free vibration of piezoelectric laminated composite plate. Finite Elem Anal Des 45:686–694Google Scholar
  8. Fares ME, Elmarghany MKh (2008) A refined zigzag nonlinear first-order shear deformation theory of composite laminated plates. Compos Struct 82:71–83Google Scholar
  9. Habip LM (1965) Theory of elastic shells in the reference state. Ingenieur-Archiv 34:228–237Google Scholar
  10. Hanna NF, Leissa AW (1994) A higher order shear deformation theory for the vibration of thick plates. J Sound Vib 170:545–555Google Scholar
  11. Kapuria S (2001) An efficient coupled theory for multilayered beams with embedded piezoelectric sensory and active layers. Int J Solids Struct 38:9179–9199Google Scholar
  12. Kioua H, Mirza S (2000) Piezoelectric induced bending and twisting of laminated composite shallow shells. Smart Mater Struct 9:476–484Google Scholar
  13. Kreja I (2007) Geometrically non-linear analysis of layered composite plates and shells. Habilitation Thesis, Politechnika GdańskaGoogle Scholar
  14. Kreja I, Schmidt R (2006) Large rotations in first-order shear deformation FE analysis of laminated shells. Int J Nonlinear Mech 41:101–123Google Scholar
  15. Lam KY, Peng XQ, Liu GR, Reddy JN (1997) A finite-element model for piezoelectric composite laminates. Smart Mater Struct 6:583–591Google Scholar
  16. Lentzen S, Schmidt R (2005) A geometrically nonlinear finite element for transient analysis of piezolaminated shells. In: Proceedings fifth EUROMECH nonlinear dynamics conference, Eindhoven, 7–12 August 2005Google Scholar
  17. Lentzen S, Klosowski P, Schmidt R (2007) Geometrically nonlinear finite element simulation of smart piezolaminated plates and shells. Smart Mater Struct 16:2265–2274Google Scholar
  18. Lin CC, Hsu CY, Huang HN (1996) Finite element analysis on deflection control of plates with piezoelectric actuators. Compos Struct 35:423–433Google Scholar
  19. Liu GR, Peng XQ, Lam KY, Tani J (1999) Vibration control simulation of laminated composite plates with integrated piezoelectrics. J Sound Vib 220:827–846Google Scholar
  20. Liu GR, Dai KY, Lim KM (2004) Static and vibration control of composite laminates integrated with piezoelectric sensors and actuators using the radial point interpolation method. Smart Mater Struct 13:1438–1447Google Scholar
  21. Manjunath TC, Bandyopadhyay B (2009) Vibration control of Timoshenko smart structures using multirate output feedback based discrete sliding mode control for SISO systems. J Sound Vib 326:50–74Google Scholar
  22. Narayanan S, Balamurugan V (2003) Finite element modeling of piezolaminated smart structures for active vibration control with distributed sensors and actuators. J Sound Vib 262:529–562Google Scholar
  23. Panda S, Ray MC (2008) Nonlinear finite element analysis of functionally graded plates integrated with patches of piezoelectric fiber reinforced composite. Finite Elem Anal Des 44:493–504Google Scholar
  24. Ray MC, Reddy JN (2005) Active control of laminated cylindrical shells using piezoelectric fiber reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol 65:1226–1236Google Scholar
  25. Reddy JN (1990) A general non-linear third-order theory of plates with moderate thickness. Int J Nonlinear Mech 25:677–686Google Scholar
  26. Schmidt R, Vu TD (2009) Nonlinear dynamic FE simulation of smart piezolaminated structures based on first- and third-order transverse shear deformation theory. Adv Mater Res 79–82:1313–1316Google Scholar
  27. Stavroulakis GE, Foutsitzi G, Hadjigeorgiou E, Marinova D, Baniotopoulos CC (2005) Design and robust optimal control of smart beams with application on vibrations suppression. Adv Eng Softw 36:806–813Google Scholar
  28. Tzou HS, Chai WK (2007) Design and testing of a hybrid polymeric electrostrictive/piezoelectric beam with bang-bang control. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:417–429Google Scholar
  29. Tzou HS, Gadre M (1989) Theoretical analysis of a multi-layered thin shell coupled with piezoelectric shell actuators for distributed vibration controls. J Sound Vib 132:433–450Google Scholar
  30. Vasques CMA, Rodrigues JD (2005) Coupled three-layered analysis of smart piezoelectric beams with different electric bounday conditions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 62:1488–1518Google Scholar
  31. Wang SY (2004) A finite element model for the static and dynamic analysis of a piezoelectric bimorph. Int J Solids Struct 41:4075–4096Google Scholar
  32. Yi S, Ling SF, Ying M (2000) Large deformation finite element analyses of composite structures integrated with piezoelectric sensors and actuators. Finite Elem Anal Des 35:1–15Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of General MechanicsRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anP. R. China

Personalised recommendations