Nuclear Architecture, Chromosome Aberrations, and Genetic Damage



Mammalian interphase nuclei are highly organized structures in which chromosome territories are nonrandomly distributed following a radial pattern. Gene richness and size markedly influence nuclear chromosome positioning. Active euchromatin and inactive heterochromatin exhibit different nuclear topology: the former is centrally located and the latter mostly placed at the periphery, within chromocenters, and around nucleoli. DNA is subjected to a wide repertoire of insults including radiation, chemical, and biological agents. The differential sensitivity of euchromatin and heterochromatin to clastogens has been a matter of debate, although most experimental evidence supports that euchromatin is more damage prone. Gene expression and DNA synthesis coupled to chromatin remodeling could act as key factors in the distribution of chromosome aberrations (CA) in euchromatic and heterochromatic regions of genome. In this chapter, the main features of nuclear architecture as well as an overview of current knowledge of genetic damage at the metaphase and interphase levels are presented. Also, the preferential involvement of transcriptionally active regions of the human genome regarding the induction of chromosome aberrations and deregulation of tumor genes is analyzed. Finally, the impact of DNA replication timing and connected chromatin remodeling processes in the generation and localization of CA and primary genetic damage is discussed.


Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell Chromosomal Aberration Histone H2AX H2AX Phosphorylation Chromosome Breakpoint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We are indebted to PEDECIBA Postgraduate Program, the Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación (ANII), and the Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation (AvH). P.L. is a former Fellow of an AvH Linkage Program research project.


  1. Aouacheria A, Navratil V et al (2006) Bioinformatic screening of human ESTs for differentially expressed genes in normal and tumor tissues. BMC Genomics 7:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-94 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrios L, Miró R et al (1989) Cytogenetic effects of radiotherapy breakpoint distribution in induced chromosome aberrations. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 41:61–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Branco MR, Pombo A (2006) Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests a role in translocation and transcription-dependent associations. PLoS Biol 4:780–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown JM, Leach J et al (2006) Coregulated human globin genes are frequently in spatial proximity when active. J Cell Biol 172(2):177–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caron H, van Schaik B et al (2001) The human transcriptome map: clustering of highly expressed genes in chromosomal domains. Science 291:1289–1292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cornforth MN, Greulich-Bode M et al (2002) Chromosomes are predominantly located randomly with respect to each other in interphase human cells. J Cell Biol 159:237–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costes SV, Chiolo I et al (2010) Spatiotemporal characterization of ionizing radiation induced DNA damage foci and their relation to chromatin organization. Mutat Res 704:78–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cowell IG, Sunter NJ et al (2007) γH2AX form preferentially in euchromatin after ionising-radiation. PLoS One 2:e1057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cremer M, Küpper K et al (2003) Inheritance of gene density-related higher order chromatin arrangements in normal and tumor cell nuclei. J Cell Biol 5:809–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De S, Michor F (2011) DNA replication timing and long-range DNA interactions predict mutational landscapes of cancer genome. Nat Biotechnol 29(12):1103–1108. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2030 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Tomaso MV, Martínez-López W, Folle GA, Palitti F (2006) Modulation of chromosome damage localisation by replication timing. Int J Radiat Biol 82:877–886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Di Tomaso MV, Martínez-López W, Palitti F (2010) Asynchronously replicating eu/heterochromatic regions shape chromosome damage. Cytogenet Genome Res 128(1–3):111–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Falk M, Lukášová E, Kozubek S (2008) Chromatin structure influences the sensitivity to γ-radiation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1783:2398–2414. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.07.010 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Folle GA (2008) Nuclear architecture, chromosome domains and genetic damage. Mutat Res 658:172–183. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2007.08.005 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Folle GA, Obe G (1995) Localization of chromosome breakpoints induced by AluI and BamHI in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells treated in G1 phase of the cell cycle. Int J Radiat Biol 68:437–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Folle GA, Obe G (1996) Intrachromosomal localization of breakpoints induced by the restriction endonucleases AluI and BamHI in Chinese hamster ovary cells treated in S-phase of the cell cycle. Int J Radiat Biol 69:447–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Folle GA, Boccardo E, Obe G (1997) Localization of chromosome breakpoints induced by DNase I in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Chromosoma (Berl) 106:391–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Folle GA, Martínez-López W, Boccardo E, Obe G (1998) Localization of chromosome breakpoints: implication of the chromatin structure and nuclear architecture. Mutat Res 404:17–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Folle GA, Liddle P, Lafon-Hughes L, Di Tomaso MV (2010) Close encounters: RIDGEs, hyperacetylated chromatin, radiation breakpoints and genes differentially expressed in tumours cluster at specific human chromosome regions. Cytogenet Genome Res 128(1–3):17–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gazave E, Gautier P, Gilchrist S, Bickmore WA (2005) Does radial nuclear organization influence DNA damage? Chromosome Res 13:377–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gierman HJ, Indemans MHJ (2007) Domain-wide regulation of gene expression in the human genome. Genome Res 17:1286–1295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilbert N, Boyle S et al (2004) Gene-rich domains are enriched in open chromatin fibers. Cell 118:555–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goetze S, Mateos-Langerak J et al (2007) The three-dimensional structure of human interphase chromosomes is related to the transcriptome map. Mol Cell Biol 27:4475–4487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grandy I, Hardt T, Schmid M, Haaf T (2002) Effects of high-order nuclear structure and Rad51 overexpression on radiation-induced chromosome rearrangements. Cytogenet Genome Res 98:265–269. doi:10.1159/00007 1046PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grigorova M, Brand R, Xiao Y, Natarajan AT (1998) Frequencies and types of exchange aberrations induced by X-rays and neutrons in Chinese hamster splenocytes detected by FISH using chromosome-specific libraries. Int J Radiat Biol 74:297–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gué M, Sun J-S, Boudier T (2006) Simultaneous localization of MLL, AF4 and ENL genes in interphase nuclei by 3D-FISH: MLL translocation revisited. BMC Cancer 6:20–24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-20 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Habermann FA, Cremer M et al (2001) Arrangements of macro- and mini-chromosomes in chicken cells. Chromosome Res 9:569–584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harewood L, Schütz F, Boyle S (2010) The effect of translocation-induced nuclear re-organization on gene expression. Genome Res 20(5):554–564. doi:10.1101/gr. 103622. 109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holmquist GP (1992) Review article: chromosome bands, their chromatin flavors, and their functional features. Am J Hum Genet 51:17–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jakob B, Splinter J, Durante M, Taucher-Scholz G (2009) Live cell microscopy analysis of radiation-induced DNA double-strand break motion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:3172–3177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jakob B, Splinter J et al (2011) DNA double-strand breaks in heterochromatin elicit fast repair protein recruitment, histone H2AX phosphorylation and relocation to euchromatin. Nucleic Acids Res 39(15):6489–6499. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr230 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jeppesen P (1997) Histone acetylation: a possible mechanism for the inheritance of cell memory at mitosis. Bioessays 19(1):67–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jeppesen P, Turner BM (1993) The inactive X chromosome in female mammals is distinguished by a lack of histone H4 acetylation, a cytogenetic marker for gene expression. Cell 74:281–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johannes C, Horstmann M et al (2004) Chromosome intrachanges and interchanges detected by multicolour banding in lymphocytes: searching for clastogen signatures in the human genome. Radiat Res 161:540–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Karagiannis TC, Kn H, El-Osta A (2007) Disparity of histone deacetylase inhibition on repair of radiation-induced DNA damage on euchromatin and constitutive heterochromatin compartments. Oncogene 26:3963–3971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Korenberg JR, Rykowski MC (1988) Human genome organization: Alu, Lines and the molecular structure of metaphase chromosome bands. Cell 53:391–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Küpper K, Köbl A et al (2007) Radial chromatin positioning is shaped by local gene density, not by gene expression. Chromosoma (Berl) 116:285–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Louis SF, Vermolen BJ et al (2005) c-Myc induces chromosomal rearrangements through telomere and chromosome remodeling in the interphase nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:9613–9618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martínez-López W, Porro V et al (2000) Interchromosomal distribution of gamma ray-induced chromatid aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Genet Mol Biol 23:1071–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martínez-López W, Folle GA, Jeppesen P, Obe G (2001) Chromosome regions enriched in hyperacetylated histone H4 are preferred sites for endonuclease- and radiation-induced breakpoints. Chromosome Res 9:69–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller OJ, Therman E (2001) Human chromosomes. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Obe G, Durante M (2010) DNA double strand breaks and chromosomal aberrations. Cytogenet Genome Res 128:8–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Obe G, Pffeifer P et al (2002) Chromosome aberrations: formation, identification and distribution. Mutat Res 504:17–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Keefe RT, Henderson SC, Spector DL (1992) Dynamic organization of DNA replication in mammalian cell nuclei: spatially and temporally defined replication of chromosome-specific alpha satellite DNA sequences. J Cell Biol 116:1095–1110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Palitti F (1993) Mechanisms of induction of chromosomal aberrations by inhibitors of DNA topoisomerases. Environ Mol Mutagen 22(4):275–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Parada LA, McQueen PG, Misteli T (2004) Tissue-specific spatial organization of genomes. Genome Biol 5:R44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Podhorecka M, Skladanoski K, Bozko P (2010) H2AX phosphorylation: its role in DNA damage response and cancer therapy. J Nucleic Acids 6:673–681. doi: 10.4061/2011/920161 Google Scholar
  48. Postberg J, Lipps HJ, Cremer T (2010) Evolutionary origin of the cell nucleus and its functional architecture. Essays Biochem 48:1–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rogakou EP, Pilch PR et al (1998) DNA double-stranded breaks induce phosphorylation of histone H2AX on serine 139. J Biol Chem 273(10):5858–5868PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roix JJ, McQueen PG et al (2003) Spatial proximity of translocation-prone loci in human lymphocytes. Nat Genet 34:287–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rouquette J, Genoud C et al (2009) Revealing the high-resolution three-dimensional network of chromatin and interchromatin space: a novel electron-microscopic approach to reconstructing nuclear architecture. Chromosome Res 17:801–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sadoni N, Langer S et al (1999) Nuclear organization of mammalian genomes: polar chromosome territories build up functionally distinct higher order compartments. J Cell Biol 146(6):1211–1226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sadoni N, Cardoso MC et al (2004) Stable chromosomal units determine the spatial and temporal organization of DNA replication. J Cell Sci 117:5353–5365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simpson PJ, Savage JR (1995) Estimating the true frequency of X-ray-induced complex chromosome exchanges using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Int J Radiat Biol 67:37–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Slijepcevic P, Natarajan AT (1994) Distribution of radiation-induced G1 exchange and terminal deletion breakpoints in Chinese hamster chromosomes as detected by G-banding. Int J Radiat Biol 66:747–755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Solovei I, Kreysing M et al (2009) Nuclear architecture of rod receptor cells adapt to vision in mammalian evolution. Cell 137:356–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tanabe H, Habermann FA, Solovei I, Cremer M, Cremer T (2002) Non-random radial arrangements of interphase chromosome territories: evolutionary considerations and functional implications. Mutat Res 504:37–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weckerle AB, Santra M et al (2011) CBFB and MYHII in inv(16)(p13q22) of acute myeloid leukaemia displaying close spatial proximity in interphase nuclei of human hematopoietic stem cells. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 50:746–755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Xiao Y, Natarajan AT (1999) Non-proportional involvement of Chinese hamster chromosomes 3, 4, 8 and 9 in X-ray-induced chromosomal aberrations. Int J Radiat Biol 75:943–951PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeneticsInstituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Clemente Estable (IIBCE)MontevideoUruguay

Personalised recommendations