Current Trends of Quality Assurance Models in LIS Education
Quality in LIS (Library and Information Science) education is a value judgement, differently interpreted by various stakeholders, such as governments, employers, students, administrators and professors. Quality Assurance (QA) models focus both on objectives of accountability and quality improvement and should be understood in an international perspective, looking forward agreed standards of quality of LIS education. In a globalised world, QA in LIS education has the aim of facilitating the recognition of qualifications for professionals. The chapter describes the work done by the International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA) Education and Training Section (SET) which has been active in supporting internationalisation of the profession and QA in LIS education realising Guidelines for a core curriculum and equivalency of qualifications. The current QA model of IFLA SET with the title “International Guidelines for Equivalency and Reciprocity of Qualifications for LIS Professionals” is integrating all the Guidelines published by the Section. The current issues in QA of LIS education is that of knowing how to adapt theories and concepts elaborated at an international level to single situations and objectively complex contexts like libraries in developing countries
KeywordsEurope Assure OECD
- Abdullahi, I. (Ed.). (2009). Global library and information science: A textbook for students and educators. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Campbell, C., & Van der Wende, M. C. (2000). International initiatives and trends in quality assurance for European Higher Education. Helsinki: ENQA.Google Scholar
- Chu, H. (2010). Library and information science education in the digital age. In A. Woodsworth (Ed.), Exploring the digital frontier (pp. 77–112). London: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
- Dalton, P., & Levinson, K. (2000). An investigation of LIS qualifications throughout the world. 66th IFLA Council and General Conference in Jerusalem, 13–18 August. Retrieved September, 2013, from http://archive.ifla.org/IV/ifla66/papers/061-161e.htm.
- ENIC-NARIC net. (2008). Gateway to recognition of academic and professional qualifications. [Online]. Retrieved September, 2013, from http://www.enic-naric.net/.
- IFLA. Education and Training Section. (2012). Guidelines for LIS educational programmes; updated version, by Smith, K., Hallan, G., Ghosh. Retrieved September, 2013, from http://www.ifla.org/publications/guidelines-for-professional-libraryinformation-educational-programs-2012.
- IFLA. Section Education and Training. (2007). World guide to library and information science education, updated version, by Schniederjürgen A. Munich: K.G. Saur.Google Scholar
- IFLA. Section Education and Training. (2008). Feasibility of international guidelines for equivalency and reciprocity of qualifications for LIS professionals, by Tammaro, A. M. & Weech, T. Retrieved September, 2013, from http://www.ifla.org/publications/feasibility-of-international-guidelines-for-equivalency-and-reciprocity-of-qualificatio.
- IFLA. Section Education and Training. (2009). International guidelines for equivalency and reciprocity of qualifications for LIS professionals. Draft guidance document for transparency, equivalency and recognition of qualifications by Terry Weech, Anna Maria Tammaro. Retrieved September, 2013, from http://www.ifla.org/publications/international-guidelines-for-equivalency-and-reciprocity-of-qualifications-for-lis-prof.
- Khoo, C., Majid, S., & Sattar Chaudry, A. (2003). Developing an accreditation system for LIS professional education programmes in Southeast Asia: Issues and perspectives. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 8, 131–149.Google Scholar
- Knox, A. B. (2001). Strengthening the quality of continuing professional education: Delivering lifelong continuing professional education across space and time. In C. H. Vermount (Ed.), 4th World conference on continuing professional education for the Library and Information Science professionals. SAUR: Munchen.Google Scholar
- OECD. (1996). Internationalisation of higher education. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Tammaro, A. M. (2005). Report on quality assurance models in LIS programs. IFLA Education and training Section. Retrieved September 2013 from http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/set/s23_Report-QA-2005.pdf.
- Tammaro, A. M. (2006). Quality assurance in library and information science (LIS) schools: Major trends and issues. In D. A. Nitecki & E. G. Abels (Eds.), Advances in librarianship (Vol. 3). London: Emerald.Google Scholar
- Tammaro, A. M. (2007). Performance indicators in library and information science (LIS) education: Towards cross-border quality assurance in Europe. Retrieved September, 2013, from www.cbpq.qc.ca/congres/congres2007/Actes/Tammaro.pdf.
- Tammaro, A. M., & Dixon, P. (2003). Strengths and issues in implementing a collaborative inter-university course: The international masters in information studies by distance. Education for Information, 21(2/3), 12–27.Google Scholar
- Tuning. (2004). Tuning educational structure in Europe; closing conference document. Tuning Project 2. Retrieved September, 2013, from http://www.aic.lv/bolona/Bologna/Reports/projects/Tuning/Tun_Book.pdf.
- UNESCO. (1984). International symposium on the harmonisation of education and training programmes in information science, librarianship and archival studies. Final report. Paris: UNESCO. October 8–12.Google Scholar
- UNESCO. (2002). First global forum on quality assurance, accreditation and the recognition of qualifications. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- UNESCO. (2004). Second global forum on international quality assurance, accreditation and recognition of quality assurance: Widening access to quality higher education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- UNESCO CEPES. (2007). Quality assurance and accreditation: A glossary of basic terms and definitions by Vlasceanu L, Grunberg L, Parlea, D. UNESCO CEPES: Bucharest.Google Scholar
- UNESCO International and Information Unit. (1998). A curriculum for an information society. Bangkok: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Virkus, S., & Hartley, R. J. (2003). Approaches to quality assurance and accreditation of LIS programmes: Experiences from Estonia and United Kingdom. Education for Information, 21, 31–48.Google Scholar
- Wozniczka-Paruzel, B. (2003). Experiences of library and information science (LIS) studies accreditation in the context of quality assurance systems in Poland. Education for Information, 21, 49–57.Google Scholar
- WTO. (1998). Education services. Background note by the secretariat. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar