Advertisement

An Advanced Constitutive Law in Multiphase Flow Model for Simulations in Compressible Media

  • C. H. Tsai
  • G. T. Yeh
Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation is to implement a new constitutive law of saturation–capillary pressure into a fractional flow-based multiphase flow model to simulate compressible subsurface flow problems. Using the new constitutive law to describe the saturation–capillary pressure relations alleviates an undue constraint on pressure distributions inherent in a widely used law. This makes the present model able to include all possible solutions of pressure distributions in subsurface flow modeling. Finite element methods (FEM) are used to discretize the three governing equations for three primary variables—saturation of water, saturation of total liquid, and total pressure. Four examples with different pressure distributions are presented to show the feasibility and advantage of using the new constitutive law. The results verify the feasibility and capability of the present model for subsurface flow systems to cover all possible pressure distributions.

Keywords

Capillary Pressure Water Saturation Mass Flux Relative Permeability NAPL Saturation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Research is supported by National Science Council under Contract No. NSC 99–2116-M-008–020 with National Central University.

References

  1. Binning P, Celia MA (1999) Practical implementation of the fractional flow approach to multi-phase flow simulation. Adv Water Resour 22:461–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carrano CS Jr, Yeh GT (1995) A Fourier analysis of dynamic optimization of the Petrov-Galerkin finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 38:4123–4155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christie I, Griffiths DF, Mitchell AR, Zienkiewicz OC (1976) Finite element methods for second order differential equations with significant first derivatives. Int J Numer Methods Eng 10:1389–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Celia MA, Binning P (1992) Two-phase unsaturated flow: one-dimensional simulation and air-phase velocities. Water Resour Res 28:2819–2828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guarnaccia JF, Pinder GF (1997) NAPL: A mathematical model for the study of NAPL contamination in granular soils, equation development and simulator documentation. The University of Vermont, RCGRD #95–22Google Scholar
  6. Kaluarachchi JJ, JC Parker (1989) An efficient finite elements method for modeling multiphase flow. Water Resour Res 25:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Khoei AR, Mohammadnejad T (2011) Numerical modeling of multiphase fluid flow in deforming porous media: a comparison between two- and three-phase models for seismic analysis of earth and rockfill damps. Comput Geotech 38:142–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Laplace PS (1806) Méchanique céleste, suppl. 10th volGoogle Scholar
  9. Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12:513–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Parker JC, Lenhard RJ, Kuppusamy T (1987a) A parametric model for constitutive properties governing multiphase flow in porous media. Water Resour Res 23(4):618–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Parker JC, Lenhard RJ (1987b) A model for hysteretic constitutive relations governing multiphase flow 1. saturation-pressure relations. Water Resour Res 23(12):2187–2196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Suk H, Yeh GT (2007) 3D, three-phase flow simulations using the Lagrangian-Eulerian approach with adaptively zooming and peak/valley capturing scheme. J Hydrol Eng 12:14–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Suk H, Yeh GT (2008) Multiphase flow modeling with general boundary conditions and automatic phase-configuration changes using a fractional-flow approach. Comput Geosci 12:541–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tsai CH, Yeh GT (2012) Retention characteristics for multiple-phasefluid systems, Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 23:451–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. van der Vorst HA (1992) Bi-CGSTAB: a fast and smoothly converging variant of Bi-CG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM Sci Stat Comput 13:631–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. van Genuchten MTh (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. White MD, Oostrom M (1996) STOMP subsurface transport over multiple phases, Theory guide, PNL-11217. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yeh GT, Fang YL, Zhang F, Sun JT, Li Y, Li MH, Siegel MD (2010) Numerical modeling of coupled fluid flow and thermal and reactive biogeochemical transport in porous and fractured media. Comput Geosci 14(1):149–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yeh GT, Tsai CH (2011) Proposing a new retention function for multiple phase-fluids. Abstract and Program, 2011 AGU Fall Meeting, CD, December 5–9, 2011Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Applied GeologyNational Central UniversityJhongli City, TaoyuanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations