Cell-Based Dynamic Equilibrium Models

Chapter
Part of the Complex Networks and Dynamic Systems book series (CNDS, volume 2)

Abstract

Cell-based dynamic equilibrium models are one class of dynamic traffic assignment (DTA) models that can capture equilibrium conditions and realistic traffic dynamics, such as queue spillback, queue formulation, and queue dissipation. However, compared with point-queue DTA models or DTA models using whole-link delay models for flow propagation, cell-based equilibrium models are often more computational demanding. This may raise issues for actual applications, in particular, for the implementation for real-time traffic control and route guidance applications, because the solution must be obtained quickly. Moreover, recent cell-based dynamic equilibrium models tend to capture more realistic travel behavior and traffic dynamics but this made the resulting models even more complicated and more difficult to solve for optimal solutions. Hence, this article aims at reviewing the recent development of cell-based dynamic equilibrium models, the formulation approaches, solution methods used, and the components of these models so as to point out the implementation issues of the latest cell-based dynamic equilibrium model with the consideration supply stochasticity for traffic control and route guidance applications as well as some gaps for future research directions.

Keywords

Transportation Expense Dial Toll 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was fully supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (HKU 716312E). The author is grateful for the two reviewers for their constructive comments.

References

  1. Ban X, Liu HX, Ferris MC, Ran B. A link-node complementarity model and solution algorithm for dynamic user equilibria with exact flow propagations. Transport Res. 2008;42B:823–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bar-Gera H. Origin-based algorithm for the traffic assignment problem. Transport Sci. 2002;36:398–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Akiva M, Cuneo D, Hasan M, Jha M, Yang Q. Evaluation of freeway control using a microscopic simulation laboratory. Transport Res. 2003;11C:29–50.Google Scholar
  4. Carey M. Optimal time-varying flows on congested networks. Oper Res. 1987;35:58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cascetta E, Nuzzolo A, Russo F, Vitetta A. A modified logit route choice model overcoming path overlapping problems: specification and some calibration results for interurban networks. In: Lesort JB, editor, Transportation and traffic theory. New York: Pergamon; 1996. pp. 697–711.Google Scholar
  6. Chow AHF. Properties of system optimal traffic assignment with departure time choice and its solution method. Transport Res. 2009;43B:325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Courant R, Friedrichs K, Lewy H. Über die partiellen differenzengleichungen der mathematischen physik. Math Ann. 1967;100:32–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daganzo CF. The cell transmission model: a simple dynamic representation of highway traffic. Transport Res. 1994;28B:269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daganzo CF. The cell transmission model, part ii: network traffic. Transport Res. 1995;29B:79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daganzo CF. The lagged cell transmission model. In: Ceder A, editor, Transportation and traffic theory. New York: Pergamon-Elservier; 1999. pp. 81–103.Google Scholar
  11. Daganzo CF. On the variational theory of traffic flow: well-posedness, duality and applications. Network Heterogeneous Media. 2006;1:601–619.Google Scholar
  12. Daganzo CF, Laval JA. On the numerical treatment of moving bottlenecks. Transport Res. 2005;39B:31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daganzo CF, Sheffi Y. On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transport Sci. 1977;11:253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dial RB. A probabilistic multipath traffic assignment model which obviates path enumeration. Transport Res. 1971;5:83–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doan K, Ukkusuri S. On the holding back problem in cell transmission based dynamic traffic assignment models. Transp. Res. Part B. 2012:1218–1238.Google Scholar
  16. Friesz TL, Bernstein DH, Smith TE, Tobin RL, Wie BW. A variational inequality formulation of the dynamic network user equilibrium problem. Oper Res. 1993;41:179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Golani H, Waller ST. Combinatorial approach for multi-destination dynamic traffic assignment. J Transport Res Board. 2004;1882:70–78.Google Scholar
  18. Han D, Lo HK. A new alternating direction method for a class of nonlinear variational inequality problems. J Optim Theor Appl. 2002;112:549–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Han D, Lo HK. Solving nonadditive traffic assignment problems: a decent method for co-coercive variational inequalities. Eur J Oper Res. 2004;159:529–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Han L, Ukkusuri S, Doan K. Complementarity formulations for the cell transmission model based dynamic user equilibrium with departure time choice, elastic demand and user heterogeneity. Transp Res B. 2011;45:1749–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ho J. A successive linear optimization approach to the dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transport Sci. 1980;14:295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jackson WB, Jucker JV. An empirical study of travel time variability and travel choice behavior. Transport Sci. 1982;16:460–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jayakrishnan R, Tsai WK, Chen A. A dynamic traffic assignment model with traffic flow relationship. Transport Res. 1995;3C:51–82.Google Scholar
  24. Lam WHK, Huang HJ. Dynamic user optimal traffic assignment model for many to one travel demand. Transport Res. 1995;29B:243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leclercq L. Bounded acceleration close to fixed and moving bottlenecks. Transport Res. 2007;41B:309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li Y, Waller ST, Ziliaskopoulos AK. A decomposition scheme for system optimal dynamic traffic assignment models. Network Spatial Econ. 2003;3:441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li Y, Ziliaskopoulos AK, Waller ST. Linear programming formulations for system optimum dynamic traffic assignment with arrival time based and departure time based demands. J Transport Res Board. 1999;1667:52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lighthill MJ, Whitham JB. On kinematic waves. I. Flow movement in long rivers. II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded road. Proc R Soc. 1955;A229:281–345.Google Scholar
  29. Lin WH, Wang C. An enhanced 0–1 mixed-integer LP formulation for traffic signal control. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst. 2004;5:238–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu HX, He XZ, He BS. Method of Successive Weighted Averages (MSWA) and self-regulated averaging schemes for solving stochastic user equilibrium problem. Network Spatial Econ. 2009;9:485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lo HK, Luo XW, Siu BWY. Degradable transport network: Travel time budget of travelers with heterogeneous risk aversion. Transp Res Part B: Methodol. 2006;40(9):792–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lo HK. A dynamic traffic assignment formulation that encapsulates the cell-transmission model. In: Ceder A, editor. Transportation and traffic theory. Oxford: Elsevier; 1999. pp. 327–350.Google Scholar
  33. Lo HK. A cell-based traffic control formulation: strategies and benefits of dynamic plans. Transport Sci. 2001;35:148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lo HK, Chen A. Traffic equilibrium problem with route-specific costs: formulation and algorithms. Transport Res. 2000;34B:493–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lo HK, Szeto WY. A cell-based variational inequality formulation of the dynamic user optimal assignment problem. Transport Res. 2002a;36B:421–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lo HK, Szeto WY. A cell-based dynamic traffic assignment model: formulation and properties. Math Comput Model. 2002b;35:849–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lo HK, Szeto WY. Modeling advanced traveler information services: static versus dynamic paradigms. Transport Res. 2004;38B:495–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mahmassani HS, Liu YH. Models of user pre-trip and en-route switching decisions in response to real-time information. Transportation systems 1997. (TS’97). Proceedings volume from the 8th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS Symposium. 1997;3:1363–1368.Google Scholar
  39. Munoz L, Sun X, Horowitz R, Alvarez L. Traffic density estimation with the cell transmission model, Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Denver, Colorado, June, 2003. 3750–3755.Google Scholar
  40. Nagurney A. Network economics: a variational inequality approach. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic; 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ngoduy D. Multiclass first order model using stochastic fundamental diagrams. Transportmetrica. 2011;7:111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nie Y. A cell-based merchant–nemhauser model for the system optimum dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transp Res B. 2011;45:329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nie Y, Zhang HM. Solving the dynamic user optimal assignment problem considering queue spillback. Network Spatial Econ. 2010;10:49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pan T, Sumalee A, Zhong R, Uno N. The stochastic cell transmission model considering spatial and temporal correlations for traffic states prediction. Proceedings of the third international symposium on dynamic traffic assignment 2010.Google Scholar
  45. Pavlis Y, Recker W. A mathematical logic approach for the transformation of the linear conditional piecewise functions of dispersion-and-store and cell transmission traffic flow models into linear mixed-integer form. Transport Sci. 2009;43:98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peeta S, Ziliaskopoulos AK. Foundations of dynamic traffic assignment: the past, the present and the future. Network Spatial Econ. 2001;1:233–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ramadurai G, Ukkusuri SV. Dynamic user equilibrium model for combined activity-travel choices using activity-travel supernetwork representation. Network Spatial Econ. 2010;10:273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ramadurai G. Novel dynamic user equilibrium models: analytical formulations, multi-dimensional choice, and an efficient algorithm. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of civil and environmental engineering. Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; 2009.Google Scholar
  49. Ramadurai G, Ukkusuri SV, Zhao S, Pang JS. Linear complementarity formulation for single bottleneck model with heterogeneous commuters. Transp Res B. 2010;44:193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ran B, Boyce D. Modeling dynamic transportation networks. An intelligent transportation system oriented approach, 2nd revised edn. Heidelberg: Springer; 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ran B, Lee DH, Shin MSI. Dynamic traffic assignment with rolling horizon implementation. J Transport Eng. 2002;128:314–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Richards PI. Shockwaves on the highway. Oper Res. 1956;4:42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shao H, Lam WHK, Tam ML. A reliability-based stochastic traffic assignment model for network with multiple user classes under uncertainty in demand. Network Spatial Econ. 2006;6:173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sharma S, Mathew TV, Ukkusuri SV. Approximation techniques for transportation network design problem under demand uncertainty. J Comput Civ Eng. 2011;25:316–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shen W, Nie YM, Zhang H. Dynamic network simplex method for designing emergency evacuation plans. Transport Res Rec. 2007;2022:83–93.Google Scholar
  56. Simon H. A behavioural model of rational choice. Q J Econ. 1955;69:99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Small KA. The scheduling of consumer activities: work trips. Am Econ Rev. 1982;72:467–479.Google Scholar
  58. Sumalee A, Zhong RX, Pan TL, Szeto WY. Stochastic cell transmission model (SCTM): A stochastic dynamic traffic model for traffic state surveillance and assignment. Trans Res B. 2011;45:507–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sumalee A, Zhong RX, Pan TL, Iryo T, Lam WHK. Stochastic cell transmission model for traffic network with demand and supply uncertainties. Transport Res B. 2010;45:507–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sumalee A, Zhong R, Szeto WY, Pan T. Stochastic cell transmission model under demand and supply uncertainties. Proceedings of the second international symposium on dynamic traffic assignment 2008.Google Scholar
  61. Szeto WY. The enhanced lagged cell-transmission model for dynamic traffic assignment. Transport Res Rec. 2008;2085:76–85.Google Scholar
  62. Szeto WY, Lo HK. A cell-based simultaneous route and departure time choice model with elastic demand. Transport Res. 2004;38B:593–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Szeto WY, Lo HK. The impact of advanced traveler information services on travel time and schedule delay costs. J Intell Transport Syst Tech Plan Oper. 2005;9:47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Szeto WY, Lo HK. Dynamic traffic assignment: properties and extensions. Transportmetrica. 2006;2:31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Szeto WY, Sumalee A. Multi-class reliability-based stochastic-dynamic-user-equilibrium assignment problem with random traffic states. Proceedings of the 88th annual meeting of transportation research board. 2009.Google Scholar
  66. Szeto WY, Ghosh B, Basu B, O’Mahony M. Cell-based short-term traffic flow forecasting using time series modelling. ASCE J Transport Eng. 2009;135:658–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Szeto WY, Sumalee A, Jiang Y. A cell-based model for multi-class doubly stochastic dynamic traffic assignment. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng. 2011;26:595–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ukkusuri S. Linear programs for user optimal dynamic traffic assignment problem. Master’s thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. 2002.Google Scholar
  69. Ukkusuri S, Han L, Doan K. Dynamic user equilibrium with a path based cell transmission model for general traffic networks. Transp Res B. 2012;46:1657–1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ukkusuri SV, Waller ST. Linear programming models for the user optimal and system optimal network design problem: formulations, comparisons and extensions. Network Spatial Econ. 2008;8:383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Waller ST, Ziliaskopoulos AK. A combinatorial user optimal dynamic traffic assignment algorithm. Ann Oper Res. 2006;144:249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wardrop J. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proceedings of the institute of civil engineers, Part II. 1952;325–378.Google Scholar
  73. Wie BW, Tobin RL, Friesz TL. The augmented lagrangian method for solving dynamic network traffic assignment models in discrete-time. Transport Sci. 1994;28:204–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wong SC, Wong CK, Tong CO. A parallelized genetic algorithm for calibration of lowry model. Parallel Comput. 2001;27:1523–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yang H, Meng Q. Departure time, route choice and congestion toll in a queuing network with elastic demand. Transport Res. 1998;32B:247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhang L, Yin Y, Lou Y. Robust signal timing for arterials under day-to-day demand variations. Transp Res Record, 2010;2192:156–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zheng H, Chang YC. A network flow algorithm for the cell-based single-destination system optimal dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transport Sci. 2011;45:121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ziliaskopoulos AK. A linear programming model for the single destination system optimum dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transport Sci. 2000;34:37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ziliaskopoulos AK, Rao L. A simultaneous route and departure time choice equilibrium model on dynamic networks. Int Trans Oper Res. 1999;6:21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ziliaskopoulos AK, Waller ST, Li Y, Byram M. Large-scale dynamic traffic assignment: implementation issues and computational analysis. J Transport Eng ASCE. 2004;130:585–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations