Advertisement

Methodological Issues in Work Disability Prevention Research

  • Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
  • Ellen MacEachen
Chapter

Abstract

The methodologies used in work disability prevention (WDP) research have advanced considerably over the past several decades. In this chapter, we discuss the importance of methodology to the researcher. We then highlight the complexity of WDP which requires different disciplinary perspectives to fully understand and address the problem. Some challenges that arise when researchers from different disciplines try to work together are presented and approaches for integrating across disciplines are described with examples from the literature. In the last part of the chapter, we describe some particular challenges that arise when conducting WDP research. These include (1) the challenges of having workplaces as the research setting; (2) reluctant respondents; (3) multiple perspectives, multiple levels of influence and complex pathways; (4) ethical conduct in WDP research; and (5) interacting with stakeholders.

Keywords

Ethical Conduct Work Disability Methodological Challenge Injured Worker Disciplinary Perspective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (2003). The reluctant respondent. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Inside interviewing: New lens, new concerns (pp. 153–173). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht, G., Freeman, S., & Higginbotham, N. (1998). Complexity and human health: The case for a transdisciplinary paradigm. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 22, 55–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Albrecht, G., Higginbotham, N., & Freeman, S. (2001). Transdisciplinary thinking in health social science research: Definition, rationale and procedures. In H. Higginbotham, G. Albrecht, & L. Connor (Eds.), Health social science: A transdisciplinary and complexity perspective (pp. 70–89). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Albright, J. J., & Marinova, D. M. (2010). Estimating multilevel models using SPSS, Stata, SAS and R [internet]. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University. Retrieved September 15, 2011, from http://www.indiana.edu/∼statmath/stat/all/hlm/hlm.pdf
  5. Amick, B. C., III, Habeck, R. V., Hunt, A., Fossel, A. H., Chapin, A., Keller, R. B., et al. (2000). Measuring the impact of organizational behaviors on work disability prevention and management. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 10(1), 21–38.Google Scholar
  6. Amick, B. C., III, Habeck, R. V., Ossman, J., Fossel, A. H., Keller, R., & Katz, J. N. (2004). Predictors of successful work role functioning after carpal tunnel release surgery. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46(5), 490–500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Amick, B. C., III, Hogg-Johnson, S., Smith, P., Mustard, C., Tompa, E., & Robson, L. (2010). Benchmarking leading organizational indicators for the prevention and management of injuries and illnesses. 2010 Grant proposal to the Workplace Safety & Insurance Board Research Advisory Council (WSIB RAC).Google Scholar
  8. Amick, B. C., Roberston, M. M., DeRango, K., Bazzani, L., Moore, A., Rooney, T., et al. (2003). Effect of office ergonomics intervention on reducing musculoskeletal symptoms. Spine, 28(24), 2706–2711.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Amick, B. C., III, Steenstra, I. A., Hogg-Johnson, S., Katz, J., Lee, H., Brouwer, S., et al. (2012a). How do ­organizational policies and practices affect return to work and work role functioning following a musculoskeletal injury. (under revision).Google Scholar
  10. Amick, B. C., III, Swift, M. B., & Hogg-Johnson, S. (2012b). Development of a leading indicator to assess occupational health and safety system performance. (in preparation).Google Scholar
  11. Ammendolia, C., Cassidy, D., Steenstra, I., Soklaridis, S., Boyle, E., Eng, S., et al. (2009). Designing a workplace return-to-work program for occupational low back pain: An intervention mapping approach. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 10(1), 65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Amorim, L. D., Fiaccone, R. L., Santos, C. A., Moraes, L. T., Oliveira, N. F., Barbosa, S. O., et al. (2010). Structural equation modeling in epidemiology. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 26(12), 2251–2262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Andersen, M. F., Nielsen, K. M., & Brinkmann, S. (2012). Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on return to work among employees with common mental disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 38(2), 93–104. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3257.Google Scholar
  14. Anderson, D. R., Serxner, S. A., & Gold, D. B. (2001). Conceptual framework, critical questions, and practical challenges in conducting research on the financial impact of worksite health promotion. The Science of Health Promotion, 15(5), 281–288.Google Scholar
  15. Anema, J. R., Schellart, A. J., Cassidy, J. D., Loisel, P., Veerman, T. J., & van der Beek, A. J. (2009). Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19(4), 419–426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Anspach, R. R., & Mizrachi, N. (2006). The field worker’s fields: Ethics, ethnography and medical sociology. Sociology of Health & Illness, 28(6), 712–731.Google Scholar
  17. Apeldoorn, A., Ostelo, R., van Helvoirt, H., Fritz, J., de Vet, H., & van Tulder, M. (2010). The cost-effectiveness of a treatment-based classification system for low back pain: Design of a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 11(1), 58.Google Scholar
  18. Armijo-Olivo, S., Stiles, C. R., Hagen, N. A., Biondo, P. D., & Cummings, G. G. (2012). Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: A comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: Methodological research. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(1), 12–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bae, S. C., Lee, H. S., Yun, H. R., Kim, T. H., Yoo, D. H., & Kim, S. Y. (2001). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Korean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) and Lequesne osteoarthritis indices for clinical research. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 9(8), 746–750.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Baggs, J., Silverstein, B., & Foley, M. (2003). Workplace health and safety regulations: Impact of enforcement and consultation on workers’ compensation claims rates in Washington State. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 43(5), 483–494.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Balasubramanian, V., Dutt, A., & Rai, S. (2011). Analysis of muscle fatigue in helicopter pilots. Applied Ergonomics, 42(6), 913–918.Google Scholar
  22. Balme, H., Stewart, D., Friffiths, H. E., Agate, J., & Watson-Jones, R. (1944). Discussion on the clinical implications of the disabled persons (employment) act, 1944. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 39(4), 152.Google Scholar
  23. Balshem, H., Helfand, M., Schunemann, H. J., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., et al. (2011). GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(4), 401–406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bambra, C., Whitehead, M., Sowden, A., Akers, J., & Petticrew, M. (2008). “A hard day’s night?” The effects of Compressed Working Week interventions on the health and work-life balance of shift workers: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62(9), 764–777.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Barbour, R. S., & Barbour, M. (2003). Evaluating and synthesizing qualitative research: The need to develop a distinctive approach. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 9(2), 179–186.Google Scholar
  26. Battie, M. C. (1992). Minimizing the impact of back pain: Workplace strategies. Seminars in Spine Surgery, 4(1), 20–28.Google Scholar
  27. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ben-Shlomo, Y., & Kuh, D. (2002). A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: Conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(6), 1192–1199.Google Scholar
  29. Bigos, S. J., Battie, M. C., Spengler, D. M., Fisher, L. D., Fordyce, W. E., Hansson, T., et al. (1992). A longitudinal, prospective study of industrial back injury reporting. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 279, 21–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Toronto: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Bombardier, C., Kerr, M. S., Shannon, H. S., & Frank, J. W. (1994). A guide to interpreting epidemiologic studies on the etiology of back pain. Spine, 19(18S), 2047S–2056S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Breslin, F. C., Kyle, N., et al. (2010). Effectiveness of health and safety in small enterprises: A systematic review of quantitative evaluations of interventions. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20, 163–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bryman, A. (2006a). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.Google Scholar
  34. Bryman, A. (2006b). Paradigm peace and the implications for quality. International Journal of Research Methodology, 9(2), 111–126.Google Scholar
  35. Buchbinder, R., & Jolley, D. (2005). Effects of a media campaign on back beliefs is sustained 3 years after its cessation. Spine, 30(11), 1323–1330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Bumin, G., Tuzun, E. H., & Tonga, E. (2008). The shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI): Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 21(1), 57–62.Google Scholar
  37. Burstrom, B., Nylen, L., Clayton, S., & Whitehead, M. (2011). How equitable is vocational rehabilitation in Sweden? A review of evidence on the implementation of a national policy framework. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(6), 453–466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Busse, J. W., Dolinschi, R., Clark, A., Scott, L., Hogg-Johnson, S., Amick, B. C., III, et al. (2011). Attitudes towards disability management: A survey of employees returning to work and their supervisors. Work, 40(2), 143–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2011). CIHR Peer review manual for grant applications. 7.2 evaluation criteria [Internet]. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Retrieved September 6, 2011, from http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/4656.html#s3_7_2
  40. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, & Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2010). Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Accessed September 15, 2011, from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf
  41. Cann, A. P., MacEachen, E., et al. (2008). Lay versus expert understandings of workplace risk in the food industry: A multi-dimensional model with implications for participatory ergonomics. Work, 30, 219–228.Google Scholar
  42. CASP, Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust. (2002). Critical appraisal skills program qualitative assessment tool. Milton Keynes, UK: Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust. Accessed September 15, 2011, from http://www.casp-uk.net/
  43. Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM). (2011). Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine—Levels of evidence (March 2009) [Internet]. Oxford, UK: Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Retrieved September 23, 2011, from http://www.cebm.net/?o=1025
  44. Cherniack, M., Dillon, C., Erdil, M., Ferguson, S., Kaplan, J., Krompinger, J., et al. (2001). Clinical and psychological correlates of lumbar motion abnormalities in low back disorders. The Spine Journal, 1, 290–298.Google Scholar
  45. Clayton, S., Barr, B., Nylen, L., Burström, B., Thielen, K., Diderichsen, F., et al. (2012). Effectiveness of return-to-work interventions for disabled people: A systematic review of government initiatives focused on changing the behaviour of employers. European Journal of Public Health, 22(3), 434–439. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr101.Google Scholar
  46. Coad, J., Hardicre, J., & Devitt, P. (2006). How to search for and use ‘grey literature’ in research. Nursing Times, 102(50), 35–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Cole, D. C., Van Eerd, D., Bigelow, P., & Rivilis, I. (2006). Integrative interventions for MSDs: Nature, evidence, challenges & directions. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 6(3), 351–366.Google Scholar
  48. Cole, D. C., Wells, R. P., Frazer, M. B., Kerr, M. S., Neumann, W. P., Laing, A. C., & The Ergonomic Intervention Evaluation Research Group. (2003). Methodological issues in evaluating workplace interventions to reduce work-related musculoskeletal disorders through mechanical exposure reduction. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 29(5), 396–405.Google Scholar
  49. Conrad, D. A., & Deyo, R. A. (1994). Economic decision analysis in the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: A methodologic primer. Spine, 19(18S), 2101S–2106S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Critchley, D. J., Ratcliffe, J., Noonan, S., Jones, R. H., & Hurley, M. V. (2007). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three types of physiotherapy used to reduce chronic low back pain disability: A pragmatic randomized trial with economic evaluation. Spine, 32(14), 1474–1481.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Daly, J., Willis, K., et al. (2007). A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 43–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Davis, M. E. (2012). Structural equation models in occupational health: An application to exposure modelling. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 69(3), 184–190. doi: 10.1136/oem.2010.063032.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. De Lange, A. H., Taris, T. W., Kompier, M. A., Houtman, I. L. D., & Bongers, P. M. (2004). The relationships between work characteristics and mental health: Examining normal, reversed and reciprocal relationships in a 4-wave study. Work and Stress, 18(2), 149–166.Google Scholar
  54. Delamarter, R., Zigler, J. E., Balderston, R. A., Cammisa, F. P., Goldstein, J. A., & Spivak, J. M. (2011). Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: Results at twenty-four months. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 93(8), 705–715.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics McMaster University. (1981a). How to read clinical journals: III. To learn the clinical course and prognosis of disease. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 124(7), 869–872.Google Scholar
  56. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics McMaster University. (1981b). How to read clinical journals: IV. To determine etiology or causation. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 124(8), 985–990.Google Scholar
  57. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics McMaster University. (1981c). How to read clinical journals: V. To distinguish useful from useless or even harmful therapy. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 124(9), 1156–1162.Google Scholar
  58. Der, G. (2002). Commentary: Structural equation modelling in epidemiology: Some problems and prospects. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(6), 1199–1200.Google Scholar
  59. Derrett, S., Davie, G., Ameratunga, S., Wyeth, E., Colhoun, S., Wilson, S., et al. (2011). Prospective outcomes of injury study: Recruitment, and participant characteristics, health and disability status. Injury Prevention, 17, 415–418.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 45–53.Google Scholar
  61. Dobbins, M., Robeson, P., Jetha, N. J., DesMeules, M., & Grey Literature. (2008). A methodology for searching the grey literature for effectiveness evidence syntheses related to public health: A report from Canada. Health Inform Journal, 17(1), 9–12.Google Scholar
  62. Dreischarf, M., Rohlmann, A., Bergmann, G., & Zander, T. (2011). Optimised loads for the simulation of axial rotation in the lumbar spine. Journal of Biomechanics, 44(12), 2323–2327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Durand, M. J., Vachon, B., Hong, Q. N., & Loisel, P. (2005). The cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH questionnaire in Canadian French. Journal of Hand Therapy, 18(1), 34–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Eakin, J. M. (2010). Towards a ‘standpoint’ perspective: Health and safety in small workplaces from the perspective of the workers. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 8(2), 113–127.Google Scholar
  65. Eakin, J. M., & MacEachen, E. (1998). Health and the social relations of work: A study of the health-related experiences of employees in small workplaces. Sociology of Health & Illness, 20(6), 896–914.Google Scholar
  66. Eakin, J. M., MacEachen, E., & Clarke, J. (2003). ‘Playing it smart’ with return to work: Small workplace experience under Ontario’s policy of self-reliance and early return. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 1(2), 19–41.Google Scholar
  67. Eakin, J., MacEachen, E., et al. (2009). The logic of practice: An ethnographic study of front-line service work with small businesses in Ontario’s Workplace Safety and Insurance Board. Working paper #346. Toronto: Institute for Work & Health.Google Scholar
  68. Egger, M., Smith, G. D., & Schneider, M. (2001). Systematic reviews of observational studies. In M. Egger, G. D. Smith, & D. G. Altman (Eds.), Systematic reviews in health care: Meta-analysis in context (2nd ed., pp. 211–227). London: BMJ Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  69. Elfering, A., Mannion, A. F., Jacobshagen, N., Tamcan, O., & Muller, U. (2009). Beliefs about back pain predict the recovery rate over 52 consecutive weeks. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 35(6), 437–445.Google Scholar
  70. Feldt, T., Kivimäki, M., Rantala, A., & Tolvanen, A. (2010). Sense of coherence and work characteristics: A cross-lagged structural equation model among managers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(3), 323–342.Google Scholar
  71. Ferdinand, J., Pearson, G., et al. (2007). A different kind of ethics. Ethnography, 8(4), 519–543.Google Scholar
  72. Foley, M., Silverstein, B., Polissar, N., & Neradilek, B. (2009). Impact of implementing the Washington State ergonomics rule on employer reported risk factors and hazard reduction activity. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 52(1), 1–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Franca, F. R., Burke, T. N., Hanada, E. S., & Marques, A. P. (2010). Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain—A comparative study. Clinics, 65(10), 1013–1017.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Franche, R. L., Cullen, K., Clarke, J., Irvin, E., Sinclair, S., & Frank, J. (2005). Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: A systematic review of the quantitative literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 607–631.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Franche, R.-L., Hepburn, G., Breslin, C., Hogg-Johnson, S., Frank, J., Mustard, C., et al. (2004). Determinants of return-to-work: Applying the readiness for change model. Grant proposal funded by the Ontario Workplace Safety and Insurance Board Research Advisory Council.Google Scholar
  76. Frank, J. W., Brooker, A. S., DeMaio, S., Kerr, M. S., Maetzel, A., Shannon, H. S., et al. (1996a). Disability resulting from occupational low back pain part II: What do we know about secondary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention after disability begins. Spine, 21(24), 2918–2929.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Frank, J. W., Kerr, M. S., Brooker, A. S., DeMaio, S., Maetzel, A., Shannon, H. S., et al. (1996b). Disability resulting from occupational low back pain part I: What do we know about primary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention before disability begins. Spine, 21(24), 2908–2917.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Fritz, J. M., Beneciuk, J. M., & George, S. Z. (2011). Relationship between categorization with the STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for people receiving physical therapy for low back pain. Physical Therapy, 91(5), 722–732.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Furlan, A. D., Tomlinson, G., Jadad, A. R., & Bombardier, C. (2008). Examining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Comparing results of randomized trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions for low back pain. Spine, 33(3), 339–348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Gallasch, C. H., Alexandre, N. M., & Amick, B., III. (2007). Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the work role functioning questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 17(4), 701–711.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Gelalis, I. D., Arnaoutoglou, C., Christoforou, G., Lykissas, M. G., Batsilas, I., & Xenakis, T. (2010). Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 44(3), 235–240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Gerr, F., Marcus, M., Monteilh, C., Hannan, L., Ortiz, D., & Kleinbaum, D. (2005). A randomised controlled trial of postural interventions for prevention of musculoskeletal symptoms among computer users. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62(7), 478–487.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Gerr, F., Marcus, M., Ortiz, D., White, B., Jones, W., Cohen, S., et al. (2000). Computer users’ postures and associations with workstation characteristics. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 61(2), 223–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Giacomini, M. (2001). The rocky road: Qualitative research as evidence. Evidence-Based Medicine, 6, 4–6.Google Scholar
  85. Goossens, M. E. J. B., & Evers, S. M. A. A. (1997). Economic evaluation of back pain interventions. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 7(1), 15–32.Google Scholar
  86. Greenhalgh, T., Wong, G., Westhorp, G., & Pawson, R. (2011). Protocol—Realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: Evolving standards (RAMESES). BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Grypdonck, M. H. F. (2006). Qualitative health research in an era of evidence-based practice. Qualitative Health Research, 16(10), 1371–1385.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Alonso-Coello, P., et al. (2011). GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence-study limitations (risk of bias). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(4), 407–415.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Hahne, A. J., Ford, J. J., Hinman, R. S., Taylor, N. F., Surkitt, L. D., Walters, A. G., et al. (2011). Outcomes and adverse events from physiotherapy functional restoration for lumbar disc herniation with associated radiculopathy. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(17/18), 1537–1547.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Hayden, J. A., Cote, P., & Bombardier, C. (2006). Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144(6), 427–437.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Higgins, J. P. T., Green, S. (Eds). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. Retrieved September 26, 2011, from www.cochrane-handbook.org
  93. Hogg-Johnson, S., Robson, L., Cole, D. C., Tompa, E., Subrata, P., Amick, B. C., III, et al. (2011). A randomized controlled study of targeted occupational health & safety consultation or inspection in Ontario workplaces, October 18–20. Morgantown, West Virginia: National Occupational Injury Research Symposium (NOIRS).Google Scholar
  94. Hox, J. J. (1994). Multilevel analysis methods. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 283–299.Google Scholar
  95. Hurley, R. E. (1999). Qualitative research and the profound grasp of the obvious. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1119–1136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Institute for Work & Health. (2009). Improving health and safety in small businesses. Sharing best evidence. Highlights of a systematic review. Toronto: Institute for Work & Health.Google Scholar
  97. Institute for Work & Health. (2010). What a researcher means by…probability. At Work, 62, 2.Google Scholar
  98. Institute for Work & Health. (2011a). What a researcher means by…sampling. At Work, 63, 2.Google Scholar
  99. Institute for Work & Health. (2011b). What a researcher means by…qualitative research. At Work, 64, 2.Google Scholar
  100. Jiang, L., Yu, G., Li, Y., & Li, F. (2010). Perceived colleagues’ safety knowledge/behavior and safety performance: Safety climate as a moderator in a multilevel study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(5), 1468–1476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Kamioka, H., Okuizumi, H., Okada, S., Takahashi, R., Handa, S., Kitayuguchi, J., et al. (2011). Effectiveness of intervention for low back pain in female caregivers in nursing homes: A pilot trial based on multicenter randomization. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 16(2), 97–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Kapborg, I., & Berterö, C. (2002). Using an interpreter in qualitative interviews: Does it threaten validity? Nursing Inquiry, 9(1), 52–56.Google Scholar
  103. Kell, R. T., Risi, A. D., & Barden, J. M. (2011). The response of persons with chronic nonspecific low back pain to three different volumes of periodized musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 25(4), 1052–1064.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Kerr, M. S., Frank, J. W., Shannon, H. S., Norman, R. W., Wells, R. P., Neumann, W. P., et al. (2001). Biomechanical and psychosocial risk factors for low back pain at work. American Journal of Public Health, 91(7), 1069–1075.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Kierklo, A., Kobus, A., Jaworska, M., & Botulinski, B. (2011). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among dentists—A questionnaire survey. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 18(1), 79–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  107. Kosny, A., MacEachen, E., Lifshin, M., Smith, P., Jafri, G., Neilson, C., et al. (2012). Delicate dances: Immigrant workers’ experiences of injury reporting and claim filing. Ethnicity and Health, 17(3), 267–290. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2011.614327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Kristensen, T. S. (2005). Intervention studies in occupational epidemiology. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62, 205–210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Kunitz, S. J. (1994). Disease and destruction of indigenous populations. In T. Ingold (Ed.), Humanity, culture and social life: An encyclopedia of anthropology (pp. 297–325). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  110. Labriola, M., Christensen, K. B., Lund, T., Nielsen, M. L., & Diderichsen, F. (2006a). Multilevel analysis of workplace and individual risk factors for long-term sickness absence. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 48(9), 923–929.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Labriola, M., Lund, T., Christensen, K. B., & Kristensen, T. S. (2006b). Multilevel analysis of individual and contextual factors as predictors of return to work. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 48(11), 1181–1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Laing, A. C., Frazer, M. B., Cole, D. C., Kerr, M. S., Wells, R. P., & Norman, R. W. (2005). Study of the effectiveness of a participatory ergonomics intervention in reducing worker pain severity through physical exposure pathways. Ergonomics, 48(2), 150–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Larkin, P. J., Dierckx de Casterlé, B., & Schotsmans, P. (2007). Multilingual translation issues in qualitative research: Reflections on a metaphorical process. Qualitative Health Research, 17(4), 468–476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Lélé, S., & Norgaard, R. B. (2005). Practising interdisciplinarity. Bioscience, 55(11), 967–975.Google Scholar
  115. Lessard, C. (2007). Complexity and reflexivity: Two important issues for economic evaluation in health care. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 1754–1765.Google Scholar
  116. Lessard, C., Contandriopoulos, A. P., & Beaulieu, M. D. (2010). The role (or not) of economic evaluation at the micro level: Can Bourdieu’s theory provide a way forward for clinical decision-making? Social Science & Medicine, 70, 1948–1956.Google Scholar
  117. Lindstrom, I., Ohlund, C., Eek, C., Wallin, L., Peterson, L. E., Fordyce, W. E., et al. (1992). The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: A randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach. Physical Therapy, 72(4), 279–293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Loisel, P., Abenhaim, L., Durand, P., Esdaile, J. M., Suissa, S., Gosselin, L., et al. (1997). A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine, 22(24), 2911–2918.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Loisel, P., Hong, Q. N., Imbeau, D., Lippel, K., Guzman, J., MacEachen, E., et al. (2009). The Work Disability Prevention CIHR Strategic Training Program: Program performance after 5 years of implementation. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19(1), 1–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Loisel, P., Lemaire, J., Poitras, S., Durand, M. J., Champagne, F., Stock, S., et al. (2002). Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a disability prevention model for back pain management: A six year follow up study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59(12), 807–815.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Lopez, G. I., Figueroa, M., Connor, S. E., & Maliski, S. L. (2011). Translation barriers in conducting qualitative research with Spanish speakers. Qualitative Health Research, 18(12), 1729–1737.Google Scholar
  122. Luomajoki, H., Kool, J., de Bruin, E. D., & Airaksinen, O. (2010). Improvement in low back movement control, decreased pain and disability, resulting from specific exercise intervention. Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy and Technology, 2(1), 11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. MacEachen, E. (2005). The demise of repetition strain injury in sceptical governing rationalities of workplace managers. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(4), 490–514.Google Scholar
  124. MacEachen, E., Clarke, J., Franche, R. L., & Irvin, E. (2006). Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32(4), 257–269.Google Scholar
  125. MacEachen, E., Kosny, A., Ferrier, S., Lippel, K., Neilson, C., Franche, R. L., et al. (2012). The ‘ability’ paradigm in vocational rehabilitation: Challenges in an Ontario injured worker retraining program. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 22(1), 105–117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. MacEachen, E., Kosny, A., Scott-Dixon, K., Facey, M., Chambers, L., Breslin, C., et al. (2010). Workplace health understandings and processes in small businesses: A systematic review of the qualitative literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20(2), 180–198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Markham, S. E., & McKee, G. H. (1995). Group absence behavior and standards: A multilevel analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 1174–1190.Google Scholar
  128. Massey, C., Alpass, F., et al. (2006). Crossing fields: The case of a multi-disciplinary research team. Qualitative Research, 6(2), 131–149.Google Scholar
  129. McAuley, L., Pham, B., Tugwell, P., & Moher, D. (2000). Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? The Lancet, 356(9237), 1228–1231.Google Scholar
  130. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  131. Milosavljevic, S., Gregory, D. E., Pal, P., Carman, A. B., Milburn, P. D., & Callaghan, J. P. (2011). The interaction between skill, postures, forces and back pain in wool handling. Applied Ergonomics, 42(6), 801–806.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Mohseni-Bandpei, M. A., Ahmad-Shirvani, M., Golbabaei, N., Behtash, H., Shahinfar, Z., & Fernandez-De-Las-Penas, C. (2011). Prevalence and risk factors associated with low back pain in Iranian surgeons. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 34(6), 362–370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Mollinga, P. P. (2010). Boundary work and the complexity of natural resources management. Crop Science, 50, S1–S9.Google Scholar
  134. Morgan, D. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76.Google Scholar
  135. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2009). Mplus users guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  136. National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2010). R01 guide for reviewers. Investigator initiated research project grant applications [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health (NIH). Retrieved September 23, 2011, http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/r_awards/R01_Guide_for_reviewers.pdf.
  137. Nelson, N. A., Kaufman, J., Kalat, J., & Silverstein, B. (1997). Falls in construction: Injury rates for OSHA-inspected employers before and after citation for violating the Washington State Fall Protection Standard. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 31(3), 296–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Ossmann, J., Amick, B. C., III, Habeck, R. V., Hunt, A., Ramamurthy, G., Soucie, V., et al. (2005). Management and employee agreement on reports of organizational policies and practices important in return to work following carpal tunnel surgery. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(1), 17–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Oxman, A., Schunemann, H., & Fretheim, A. (2006). Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 7. Deciding what evidence to include. Health Research Policy and Systems, 4(1), 19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Peugh, J. L., & Ender, C. K. (2005). Using the SPSS mixed procedure to fit cross-sectional and longitudinal multilevel models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 714–741.Google Scholar
  141. Polanyi, M., Cole, D. C., Beaton, D. E., Chung, J., Wells, R., Abdolell, M., et al. (1997). Upper limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders among newspaper employees: Cross-sectional survey results. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 32, 620–628.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Popay, J., Rogers, A., & Williams, G. (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 341–351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Pope, C., Ziebland, S., et al. (2000). Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal, 320(7227), 114–116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Pulcins, I. R., Goel, V., Cohen, J. E., & Frank, J. W. (1994). A structured critical review of acute back pain prognosis studies. Toronto: Ontario Workers’ Compensation Institute.Google Scholar
  145. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2005). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  146. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  147. Ring, N., Ritchie, K., Mandava, L., & Jepson, R. (2011). A guide to synthesising qualitative research for researchers undertaking health technology assessments and systematic reviews. Edinburgh: NHS Quality Improvement Scotland.Google Scholar
  148. SAS Institute Inc. (2008). SAS/STAT® 9.2 users guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  149. SAS v9.2 [computer program]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2008.Google Scholar
  150. Schilling, R. S. F. (1944). Industrial health research: The work of the Industrial Health Research Board, 1918–44. British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1, 145–152.Google Scholar
  151. Scientific Software International. (2011). LISREL for windows [Internet]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International. Accessed September 23, 2011, from http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/
  152. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  153. Shamliyan, T., Kane, R. L., & Dickinson, S. (2010). A systematic review of tools used to assess the quality of observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseases. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(10), 1061–1070.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Shrier, I., Boivin, J. F., Steele, R. J., Platt, R. W., Furlan, A., Kakuma, R., et al. (2007). Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles. American Journal of Epidemiology, 166(10), 1203–1209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Silverstein, B., Viikari-Juntura, E., & Kalat, J. (2002). Use of a prevention index to identify industries at high risk for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, back, and upper extremity in Washington state, 1990–1998. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 41(3), 149–169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 323–355.Google Scholar
  157. Sofaer, S. (1999). Qualitative methods: What are they and why use them? Health Services Research, 34(5 (Part II)), 1101–1118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Dillon, L. (2003). Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. London: Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office, Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
  159. StataCorp LP. (2011). Structural equation modeling (SEM) [Internet]. Texas: StataCorp LP. Accessed September 23, 2011, from http://www.stata.com/stata12/structural-equation-modeling/
  160. Sullivan, M., Paul, C. E., Herbison, G. P., Tamou, P., Derret, S., & Crawford, M. (2010). A longitudinal study of the life histories of people with spinal cord injury. Injury Prevention, 16(6), e3. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.028134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. Temple, B., & Young, A. (2004). Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research, 4(2), 161–178.Google Scholar
  162. Thomas, J., Harden, A., Oakley, A., Oliver, S., Sutcliffe, K., Rees, R., et al. (2004). Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 328(1010), 1012.Google Scholar
  163. Thompson, S., Ekelund, U., Jebb, S., Lindroos, A. K., Mander, A., Sharp, S., et al. (2011). A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40(3), 765–777.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Väänänen, A., Toppinen-Tanner, S., Kalimo, R., Mutanen, P., Vahtera, J., & Peiró, J. M. (2003). Job characteristics, physical and psychological symptoms, and social support as antecedents of sickness absence among men and women in the private industrial sector. Social Science & Medicine, 57(5), 807–824.Google Scholar
  165. Van Eerd, D., Hogg-Johnson, S., Mazumder, A., Cole, D., Wells, R., & Moore, A. (2009). Task exposures in an office environment: A comparison of methods. Ergonomics, 52(10), 1248–1258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Walker, J., Sofaer, B., & Holloway, I. (2006). The experience of chronic back pain: Accounts of loss in those seeking help from pain clinics. European Journal of Pain, 10(3), 199–207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Webster, B. S., Cifuentes, M., Verma, S., & Pransky, G. (2009). Geographic variation in opioid prescribing for acute, work-related, low back pain and associated factors: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 52(2), 162–171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. Webster, B. S., Verma, S. K., & Gatchel, R. J. (2007). Relationship between early opioid prescribing for acute occupational low back pain and disability duration, medical costs, subsequent surgery and late opioid use. Spine, 32(19), 2127–2132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. Wiles, R., Crow, G., et al. (2007). The management of confidentiality and anonymity in social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(5), 417–428.Google Scholar
  170. Wu, S., Li, H., Zhu, W., Li, J., & Wang, X. (2010). A structural equation model relating work stress, coping resource, and quality of life among Chinese medical professionals. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 53(11), 1170–1176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Wynne-Jones, G., Buch, R., Varnava, A., Phillips, C. J., & Main, C. J. (2010). Letters to the editor. Reply. Occupational Medicine, 60(1), 81–82.Google Scholar
  172. Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. Zohar, D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 587–596.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. Zohar, D. (2003). Safety climate: Conceptual and measurement issues. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational psychology (1st ed., pp. 123–142). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Work and HealthTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Health Policy, Management and EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations