Advertisement

Core Components of Return-to-Work Interventions

Chapter

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, a tremendous amount of time and resources have been spent on developing evidence-based interventions to facilitate return-to-work and prevent work disability. However, an important challenge in implementing these interventions resides in the fact that replicating them requires identifying their effective components. This chapter addresses this particular issue by first introducing the reader to methods and concepts used in the identification of core components of evidence-based interventions. Then, it presents a summary of the latest evidence on core components of intervention to facilitate work resumption for workers affected by two common health problems: musculoskeletal disorders and mental illnesses. Finally, it presents the specific research gaps that should be addressed to facilitate dissemination and implementation of evidence-based return-to-work interventions in a broader effort to reduce the burden of work disability worldwide.

Keywords

Mental Health Condition Intervention Component Core Component Work Disability Disability Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ammendolia, C., Cassidy, D., Steenstra, I., Soklaridis, S., Boyle, E., Eng, S., et al. (2009). Designing a workplace return-to-work program for occupational low back pain: An intervention mapping approach. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 10, 65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartholomew, K., Parcel, G., Kok, G., & Gottlieb, N. (2001). Intervention Mapping: Developing theory and evidence-based health education programs. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  3. Bultmann, U., Sherson, D., Olsen, J., Hansen, C. L., Lund, T., & Kilsgaard, J. (2009). Coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19(1), 81–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. R., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Durand, M. J., Vachon, B., Loisel, P., & Berthelette, D. (2003). Constructing the program impact theory for evidence-based work rehabilitation program for workers with low back pain. Work, 21, 233–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eke, A. N., Neumann, M. S., Wilkes, A. L., & Jones, P. L. (2006). Preparing effective behavioral interventions to be used by prevention providers: The role of researchers during HIV prevention research trials. AIDS Education and Prevention, 18, 44–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fassier, J. B., Durand, M. J., & Loisel, P. (2011). Implementing return-to-work interventions for workers with low-back pain—A conceptual framework to identify barriers and facilitators. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 37(2), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network. FMHI Publication #231.Google Scholar
  9. Galbraith, J. S., Herbst, J. H., Whittier, D. K., Jones, P. L., Smith, B. D., Uhl, G., et al. (2011). Taxonomy for strengthening the identification of core elements for evidence-based behavioral interventions for HIV/AIDS prevention. Health Education Research, 26(5), 872–885.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenhalgh, T., Kyriakidou, O., & Peacock, R. (2004). How to spread good ideas: A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability of innovations in health service delivery and organisation. London, UK: Report for the NCCSDO.Google Scholar
  11. Greenhalgh, T., Roberts, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O., & Peacock, R. (2005). Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: A meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 61(2), 427–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hong, Q. N. (2010). Activities used to implement work disability prevention program: A scoping review. Report presented to the Department of Health Administration, University of Montreal in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the International Master’s Program In Health Technology assessment and Management (the ULYSSES Program).Google Scholar
  13. Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormack, B. (1998). Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: A conceptual framework. Quality in Health Care, 7(3), 149–158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lambeek, L. C., van Mechelen, W., Knol, D. L., Loisel, P., & Anema, J. R. (2010). Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life. British Medical Journal, 340, c1035.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee, S., Altschul, I., & Mowbray, C. (2008). Using planned adaptation to implement evidence-based programs with new populations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 290–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Loisel, P., Buchbinder, R., Hazard, R., Keller, R., Scheel, I., van Tulder, M., et al. (2005). Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: The challenge of implementing evidence. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 507–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. MacEachen, E., Clarke, J., Franche, R. L., & Irvin, E. (2006). Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return-to-work after injury. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32(4), 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McKleroy, V. S., Galbraith, J., Cummings, B., Jones, P., Harshbarger, C., Collins, C., et al. (2006). Adapting evidence based behavioral interventions for new settings and target populations. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  19. Pomaki, G., Franche, R. L., Khushrushahi, N., Murray, E., Lampinen, T., & Mah, P. (2010). Best Practices for Return-to-work/Stay-at-work Interventions for Workers with Mental Health Conditions. Vancouver, BC: Occupational Health and Safety Agency for Healthcare in BC (OHSAH). Final report.Google Scholar
  20. Popay, J. (Ed.). (2006). Moving beyond effectiveness in evidence synthesis: Methodological issues in the synthesis of diverse sources of evidence. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.Google Scholar
  21. Shaw, W., Hong, Q. N., Pransky, G., & Loisel, P. (2008). A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18(1), 2–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. The Community Toolbox by the Work Group for Community Health and Development at the University of Kansas. Retrieved April 2, 2012, from http://ctb.ku.edu/en/default.aspx
  23. Tjulin, A., Stiwne, E. E., & Ekberg, K. (2009). Experience of the implementation of a multi-stakeholder return-to-work programme. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19, 409–418.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. van Oostrom, S. H., Anema, J. R., Terluin, B., Venema, A., de Vet, H. C., & van Mechelen, W. (2007). Development of a workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with stress-related mental disorders: Intervention Mapping as a useful tool. BMC Health Services Research, 7, 127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Vermeulen, S. J., Anema, J. R., Schellart, A. J., van Mechelen, W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2009). Intervention mapping for development of a participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders. BMC Public Health, 9, 216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Waddell, G., Burton, K., & Kendall, N. (2009). Vocational rehabilitation: What works, for whom, and when? Literature review report presented by The Vocational Rehabilitation Task Group in association with the Industrial Injuries Advisory Council (IIAC). United Kingdom: TSO Information & publishing solutions.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of PretoriaPretoriaRepublic of South Africa

Personalised recommendations