Water Sector Analysis

  • Sokhem Pech


This Chapter focuses on the water resources and associated environs of the Mekong River Basin. First, the Chapter reviews and analyses the suite of potential implications for water arising from the implementation of the six contemplated decisions described in Chap. 1. Second, a derived cumulative analysis is described.


Water Sector Mekong Delta Salinity Intrusion Hydropower Development Mekong River Commission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. ADB, and SEI. 2002. Strategic environmental framework: Integrating development and environment in the transport and water resources sectors, Vols. II, II and IV. Manila: Asian Development Bank and Stockholm Environment Institute.Google Scholar
  2. ADB (2009), ‘Annual Report of the Community of Practice on Water‘, (Manila: Asian Development Bank).Google Scholar
  3. ADB – RETA 40082. 2011. 3S Technical sheets of key topics no 8 large scale infrastructure development in the 3Ss 8b – mining development. Accessed on line on 16 Feb 2011 at
  4. Baran, E. 2005. Cambodian inland fisheries – facts, figures and context. Penang: World Fish Centre.Google Scholar
  5. Baran, E., P. Starr, and Y. Kura. 2007. Influence of built structures on Tonle Sap fisheries Cambodia National Mekong Committee and the WorldFish Centre. Phnom Penh. 44.Google Scholar
  6. Bravard, J. P., and M. Goichot. 2010. Ensuring ecosystem integrity and ecosystem services: A critical review of the BDP (Basin Development Plan) environmental assessment. Critical review by International NGOs at the BDP2 3rd Stakeholders Forum, Vientiane 29–30 July 2010.Google Scholar
  7. Catch and Culture. 2005. Fisheries research and development in the Mekong Region, Vol. 11, no.1, issue of May 2005, fishery programme. Vientiane: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.Google Scholar
  8. CSIRO. 2011. Measuring forestry’s impact on water availability. Accessed on line on 18 Feb 2011 at .
  9. Daming, H. 1997. Sustainable development of Lancang-Mekong River Basin and integrated multi-objective utilization research of water Resources, Journal of Chinese Geography 7(4):9–21.Google Scholar
  10. Dore, J., and X. Yu. 2004. Yunnan hydropower expansion: Update on China’s energy industry reforms and the Nu, Lancang and Jinsha hydropower dams. Chiang Mai University’s unit for social and environmental research, and Green Watershed.Google Scholar
  11. Dosch, J., and O. Hensengerth. 2005. Sub-regional cooperation in Southeast Asia: The Mekong Basin, Brill academic publishers. European Journal of East Asian Studies 4(2): 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. FAO. 2005. Increasing the contribution of small-scale fisheries to poverty alleviation and food security, FAO technical guidelines for responsible fisheries. No. 10. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  13. Fox, J.M., J.B. Vogler, O.L. Sen, A.L. Ziegler, and T.W. Giambelluca. 2012. Simulating land-cover change in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia. Environmental Management 49(5): 968–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grupo Guayubira. 2011. Testimonies about the impacts of large-scale tree plantations on flora and fauna, Montevideo – Uruguay Accessed on line on 18 Feb 2011 at
  15. Halcrow Group. 2003. Water utilization project component A: Hydro-ecological report (discussion paper 11). Phnom Penh: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.Google Scholar
  16. Halcrow Group. 2004. Development of basin modelling package and knowledge base (WUP-A), DSF 650 technical reference report appendix A 1–6. Phnom Penh: Halcrow Group Limited, for Mekong River Commission Secretariat.Google Scholar
  17. ICEM. 2010. MRC strategic environmental assessment for hydropower on the Mekong mainstream impacts assessment (opportunities and risks), discussion draft, MRC Initiative on Sustainable Hydropower (ISH). Vientiane: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.Google Scholar
  18. Jiabao, W. 2005. Opening statement – A stronger partnership for common prosperity. Kunming: 2nd Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) Summit.Google Scholar
  19. Keskinen, M., and M. Kummu. 2010. Impact assessment in the Mekong – Review of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) & Cumulative Impact Assessment (CIA), improving Mekong water allocation project (PN67) Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF). Finland: Water and Development Research Group, Aalto University.Google Scholar
  20. Lazarus, K. 2009. In search of aluminum: China’s role in the Mekong Region. Cambodia: Heinrich Böll Stiftung Cambodia, World Wild Fund and International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  21. Menne, W. 2004. Timber plantations in Swaziland: An investigation into the environmental and social impacts of large-scale timber plantations in Swaziland, Timberwatch coalition member, commissioned by the World Rainforest Movement (WRM).Google Scholar
  22. Miyazawa, N., K. Sunada, and S. Pech. 2008. Bank erosion in the Mekong River Basin: Is bank erosion in my town caused by activities from my neighbours? In The modern Mekong myth book, ed. M. Kummu, M. Keskinen, and O. Varis, 19–26. Helsinki: Finnish Academy of Sciences, Helsinki University of Technology (TKK).Google Scholar
  23. Miyazawa, N., S. Kengo, and S. Pech. 2008. Book chapter: Bank erosion in the Mekong River Basin: Is bank erosion in my town caused by activities from my neighbours? In: The modern Mekong myth book, ed. The Matti Kummu Marko Keskinen Olli Varis, 19–26. Finnish Academy of Sciences, Helsinki University of Technology (TKK).Google Scholar
  24. Molle, F., and P. Floch. 2008. The “Desert bloom” syndrome: Irrigation development, politics, and ideology in the Northeast of Thailand. Working paper. Mekong program on water, environment and resilience, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, International Water Management Institute. M-POWER, Chiang Mai.
  25. Molle, F., T. Foran, and M. Kakonen. 2009. Contested waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Hydropower, livelihoods, and governance. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  26. MRC. 2002. Basin development planning regional sector overview – agriculture and irrigation report. Phnom Penh: MRC Secretariat, Basin Development Plan Programme.Google Scholar
  27. MRC. 2003. State of the basin report. Phnom Penh: Mekong River Commission Secretariat. 316 pages. ISSN 1728:3248.Google Scholar
  28. MRC. 2005. The MRC basin development plan – scenario for strategic planning, BDP library. Vol. 4, Vientiane, Lao PDR: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.Google Scholar
  29. MRC. 2009. The modelling the flow of the Mekong, MRC management information booklet series no 3. Vientiane, Lao PDR: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.Google Scholar
  30. MRC. 2010a. State of the basin report. Vientiane, Lao PDR: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.Google Scholar
  31. MRC. 2010b. Assessment of basin-wide development scenarios, basin development plan programme, Phase 2. Vientiane, Lao PDR: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.Google Scholar
  32. MRC. 2010c. IWRM-Based basin development strategy for the lower Mekong basin – first complete draft – 15 Sept 2010. Vientiane, Lao PDR: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.Google Scholar
  33. MRC. 2010d. Impacts of climate change and development on Mekong flow regime. First assessment – 2009. MRC Technical paper no. 29. Vientiane, Lao PDR: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.Google Scholar
  34. MRC. 2010e. Technical note 2 – Hydrological assessment, Vientiane, Lao PDR: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.Google Scholar
  35. Nikula, J. 2008. Is harm and destruction all that floods bring? In The modern Mekong myth book, ed. M. Kummu, M. Keskinen, and O. Varis, 19–26. Helsinki: Finnish Academy of Sciences, Helsinki University of Technology (TKK).Google Scholar
  36. Papademetriou, M.K. 2000. Rice production in the Asia–Pacific region: issues and perspectives, Food and agriculture organization, regional office for Asia and the Pacific,
  37. Pech, S. 2010. Cambodian and Mekong water resources governance. In Transboundary resources and environment in mainland Southeast Asia, ed. Sato J. Institute for advanced studies on Asia, The University of Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  38. Pech, S., and K. Sunada. 2006, China natural resources demand: Opportunities and challenges for Mekong sub-region, Processing of regional workshop “China in mainland Southeast Asia: Flying with the Dragon”, Chiang Mai 17–19 Oct 2006.Google Scholar
  39. Pech, S., and K. Sunada. 2008. Population growth and natural resources pressures in Mekong River Basin. Ambio – A Journal of the Human Environment XXXVII(3): 219–224Google Scholar
  40. Raskin, P.D., and E. Kemp-Benedict. 2002. Global environmental outlook scenario framework. Background paper for UNEP’s third global environmental outlook report. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute.Google Scholar
  41. Regional POE. 2010. Review of the Mekong river commission’s basin development plan programme Phase 2. Vientiane: Panel of Experts Report prepared for the Mekong River Commission Secretariat, M-POWER.Google Scholar
  42. Revenga, C., and G. Mock. 2000. Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: Freshwater systems and world resources 1998–99. view_feature.
  43. Sanyu. 2004. Nam Ngum water management project for Vientiane plain of Lao PDR and northeast Thai region, by Sanya Consultants Inc. SCI, Japan.Google Scholar
  44. Sarkkula et al. (2010). Juha Sarkkula, Jorma Koponen, Hannu Lauri, Markku Virtanen. Origin, fate and impacts of the Mekong sediments. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, Lao PDR.Google Scholar
  45. Shigeko. 2009. The Mekong river delta. Kokon Shoin PublishersGoogle Scholar
  46. Smajgl, A., J. Ward, T. Foran, J. Dore, and S. Larson In review. Visions, beliefs and transformation:Methods for understanding cross-scale and trans-boundary dynamics in the wider Mekong Region. Global Environmental Change.Google Scholar
  47. Smakhtin, V., C. Revenga, P. Döll, and R. Tharme. 2003. Giving nature its share: Reserving water for ecosystems. In Putting the water requirements of freshwater ecosystems into the global picture of water resource assessment, ed. A. Moy. Accessed on 6 Feb 2011 at Scholar
  48. SMEC. 1998. Final report water utilization programme preparation project. Bangkok: SMEC/MRC Secretariat.Google Scholar
  49. Thompson, R. 2010. Regional and international country experiences lessons learned,
  50. UN. 2007. World population prospects: The 2006 revision, population division of the department of economic and social affairs of the United Nations Secretariat.Google Scholar
  51. UNEP/GIWA. 2006. Global international waters assessment: Mekong River – GIWA regional assessment 55, University of Kalmar for United Nations environment programme.Google Scholar
  52. Van Zalinge, N.P., 2002. Update on the status of the Cambodian inland capture fisheries sector with special reference to the Tonle Sap Great Lake, Mekong Fish Catch and Culture, Vol. 8 no. 2.Google Scholar
  53. WRI. 2011. Earthtrends environmental information. Washington, D.C.: World Resource Insititue.
  54. World Bank. 2004. Mekong Regional water resources assistance strategy – modelled observations on development scenarios in the lower Mekong basin. Vientiane: World Bank.Google Scholar
  55. World Bank and ADB. 2006. Future directions for water resources management in the Mekong River Basin. Joint working paper. Vientiane: World Bank and the Asian Development Bank, 65.Google Scholar
  56. Xu, A., and D. Moller. 2003. Hydropower development plan set for Lancang River. In Accessed on 10 Feb 2011.
  57. Ziegler, A.D., J.M. Fox, and J. Xu. 2009. The rubber juggernaut. Science 324: 1024–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sokhem Pech
    • 1
  1. 1.Hatfield Consultants PartnershipNorth VancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations