Abstract
In recent years M&A has been as a prominent strategy in the context of inter-firm technology transfer. Prior literature has evaluated the latter by using different types of post-merger innovation measurements. In this connection the chapter provides a framework to analyze the effects of corporate acquisitions on innovation quality. The approach presumes that an acquirer’s post-merger innovation outcome is a function of learning capabilities with respect to recent technologies.
We investigate a sample of German domestic and cross-border takeovers, in order to analyze the ex-ante determinants of post-merger innovation quality. The data is based on patent information from the German Patent and Trade Mark Office.
The results show that especially middle-aged and specialized acquirers achieve improved innovation quality subsequent to takeovers. Furthermore, the measurement via patent citations allows a more direct consideration of the value created by corporate acquisitions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Acs ZJ, Preston L (1997) Small and medium-sized enterprises, technology, and globalization: introduction to a special issue on small and medium-sized enterprises in the global economy. Small Bus Econ 9(1):1–6
Ahuja G, Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strateg Manage J 22(3):197–220
Ahuja G, Lampert MC (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strateg Manage J 22(6–7):521–543
Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84(3):488–500
Audretsch DB, Acs ZJ (1991) Innovation and size at the firm level. South Econ J 57(3):739–744
Balasubramanian N, Lee J (2008) Firm age and innovation. Ind Corp Change 17(5):1019–1047
Bowman EH, Hurry D (1993) Strategy through the option lens: an integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. Acad Manage Rev 18(4):760–782
Capron L, Shen JC (2007) Acquisitions of private vs. public firms: private information, target selection, and acquirer returns. Strateg Manage J 28(9):891–911
Cassiman B, Colombo MG, Garrone P, Veugelers R (2005) The impact of M&A on the R&D process: an empirical analysis of the role of technological- and market-relatedness. Res Policy 34(2):195–220
Chakrabarti A, Hauschildt J, Süverkrüp C (1994) Does it pay to acquire technological firms? R&D Manage 24(1):047–056
Child J. (1972) “Organization structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice”, Sociology, Vol. 6 (January 2971), pp: 1–22
Cloodt M, Hagedoorn J, Kranenburg HV (2006) Mergers and acquisitions: their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries. Res Policy 35(5):642–654
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Econ J 99(397):569–596
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1, Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation):128–152
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1994) Fortune favors the prepared firm. Manage Sci 40(2):227–251
Desyllas P, Hughes A (2009) The revealed preferences of high technology acquirers: an analysis of the innovation characteristics of their targets. Camb J Econ 33(6):1089–1111
Desyllas P, Hughes A (2010) Do high technology acquirers become more innovative? Res Policy 39(8):1105–1121
Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2005) When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strateg Manage J 26(10):947–965
Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Manage Sci 47(1):117–132
Greene W (2003) Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J Econ Lit 28(4):1661–1707
Grimpe C, Hussinger K (2008) Pre-empting technology competition through firm acquisitions. Econ Lett 100(2):189–191
Hagedoorn J, Cloodt M (2003) Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Res Policy 32(8):1365–1379
Hagedoorn J, Duysters G (2002) The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 14(1):67–85
Hall BH, Berndt E, Levin RC (1990) The impact of corporate restructuring on industrial research and development. Brookings Pap Econ Activ Microecon 1990:85–124
Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The nber patent citations data file lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER working paper series (8498), pp 1–74
Harhoff D, Narin F, Scherer FM, Vopel K (1999) Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev Econ Stat 81(3):511–515
Henderson R, Cockburn I (1994) Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strateg Manage J 15(S1):63–84
Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Ireland RD, Harrison JS (1991) Effects of acquisitions on R&D inputs and outputs. Acad Manage J 34(3):693–706
Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Johnson RA, Moesel DD (1996) The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Acad Manage J 39(5):1084–1119
Hussinger K (2010) On the importance of technological relatedness: SMEs versus large acquisition targets. Technovation 30(1):57–64
Hussinger K (2011) Absorptive capacity and post-acquisition inventor productivity. J Technol Trans, August 2012, 37(4):490–507
Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market values. Am Econ Rev 76(5):984–1001
Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 108(3):577–598
Katz R, Allen TJ (1982) Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: a look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Manage 12(1):7–20
Lane PJ, Lubatkin M (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strateg Manage J 19(5):461–477
Lang G (2009) Measuring the returns of R&D: an empirical study of the German manufacturing sector over 45 years. Res Policy 38(9):1438–1445
Lanjouw JO, Schankerman M (2004) Patent quality and research productivity: measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Econ J 114(495):441–465
Lehmann EE, Braun T, Krispin S (2011) Entrepreneurial human capital, complementary assets, and takeover probability. J Technol Trans, October 2012, 37(5):589–608
Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strateg Manage J 13(S1):111–125
Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strateg Manage J 14(S2):95–112
Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annu Rev Sociol 14:319–340
Link AN, Rees J (1990) Firm size, university based research, and the returns to R&D. Small Bus Econ 2(1):25–31
Makri M, Lane PJ (2007) Responding to technological maturity: a sociocognitive model of science and innovation in technological communities. J High Technol Manage Res 18(1):1–14
Makri M, Hitt MA, Lane PJ (2010) Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions. Strateg Manage J 31(6):602–628
Moeller SB, Schlingemann FP, Stulz RM (2005) Wealth destruction on a massive scale? A study of acquiring-firm returns in the recent merger wave. J Finance 60(2):757–782
Prabhu JC, Chandy RK, Ellis ME (2005) The impact of acquisitions on innovation: poison pill, placebo, or tonic? J Mark 69(1):114–130
Ranft AL, Lord MD (2002) Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: a grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organ Sci 13(4):420–441
Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94(5):1002–1037
Sampson RC (2007) R&D alliance and firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Acad Manage J 50(2):364–386
Schumpeter J (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Shen JC, Reuer JJ (2005) Adverse selection in acquisitions of small manufacturing firms: a comparison of private and public targets. Small Bus Econ 24:393–407
Smolny W (1998) Innovations, prices and employment: a theoretical model and an empirical application for west German manufacturing firms. J Ind Econ 46(3):359–381
Spence AM (1973) Job market signaling. Q J Econ 87(3):355–374
Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand J Econ 21(1):172–187
Valentini G (2011) Measuring the effect of M&A on patenting quantity and quality. Strategic Management Journal, March 2012, 33(3):336–346
Veugelers R (2006) Literature review on M&A and R&D. In: Cassiman B, Colombo MG (eds) Mergers & acquisitions: the innovation impact. Elgar, Northampton
Winship C, Morgan SL (1999) The estimation of causal effects from observational data. Annu Rev Sociol 25(1):659–706
Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manage Rev 27(2):185–203
Zhao X (2009) Technological innovation and acquisitions. Manage Sci 55(7):1170–1183
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buss, P. (2012). The Impact of Technological Acquisitions on Innovation Quality. In: Audretsch, D., Lehmann, E., Link, A., Starnecker, A. (eds) Technology Transfer in a Global Economy. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 28. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6102-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6102-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6101-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6102-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)