Investigating the Lateral Migration of Technology in a Resource-Based Economy: Conceptual and Methodological Issues from a Study of the Australian Mining Sector

  • Tim Turpin
  • Hao Tan
  • Phil Toner
  • Sam Garrett-Jones
Part of the International Studies in Entrepreneurship book series (ISEN, volume 28)


‘Lateral migration’ refers to the application of technologies in a different sector and context from that in which they were originally developed (Pogue and Rampa, 2006). Lorentzen and Pogue (2009) and Jourdan (2010) have proposed that this is most likely to occur when there is: a significant market demand from local producers; local opportunity to test and commission new technologies; a cluster of firms that can support each other and cross fertilize ideas; and a strong base of R&D. In order to investigate these propositions a robust methodology is needed to identify the pathways along which such technology migration occurs and the ways it is facilitated or inhibited. This paper reports on a conceptual and methodological approach to investigate lateral migration of technology from the mining and energy sector in Australia. First, an econometric analysis is used to measure the extent of lateral migration of mining and energy technologies using patent, trade and input-output data sets to provide a quantitative account of which technologies are more successful than others in migrating into other sectors. Second we use a case study approach to investigate the processes that inhibit or facilitate lateral migration


Knowledge Spillover Capital Good Patent Citation Mining Technology European Patent Office 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. ABS (2011) Table 8104 Research and experimental development business Australia 2008–9, and Table 8112.0 Research and Development, All sector summary available at
  2. Arundel A, Van de Paal G, Soete L (1995) PACE report: innovation strategies of Europe’s largest firms: results of the PACE survey for information sources. Public research, protection of innovations, and government programmes, final report. MERIT, University of Limburg, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  3. AusIMM (2011) Submission on the exposure draft of the tax laws amendment (Research and Development) Bill 2010, AusIMM, Carlton, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2010) Special table on merchandise exports prepared by ABS from Table 5368.0 International Trade in Goods and Services, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) Australian System of National Accounts, cat no. 5204.0, Table 64. Gross Fixed Capital Formation, by industry by type of assetGoogle Scholar
  6. Coe DT, Hoffmaister AW (1999) Are there international R&D spillovers among randomly matched trading partners? A response to Keller. IMF working paper 99/18, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Commonwealth of Australia (2010) Benefitting from our mineral resources: opportunities, challenges and policy settings, statement 4, budget 2010–11, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  8. Department of Primary Industries and Energy (1995) DPIE response to the industry commission draft report on research and development, Canberra, March 1995Google Scholar
  9. Fung KM, Chow WW (2002) Measuring the intensity of knowledge flow with patent statistics. Econ Lett 74:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garrett-Jones S, Turpin T, Bellavista J, Hill S (1995) Using basic research – assessing connections between basic research and socioeconomic objectives. Part 1: review of current theory and international practices. AGPS, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  11. Glaser EL, Kallal HD, Scheinkman JA, Shleifer A (1992) Growth of cities. J Polit Econ 100(6):1126–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gregory Bob and Peter Sheehan (2011) The resources boom and macroeconomic policy in Australia, Australian Economic Report: Number 1, Centre for Strategic Economic Studies Victoria University, MelbourneCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J Econ 10(1):92–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Tratjenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data fileGoogle Scholar
  15. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 108(3):577–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jojo J (2006) International technology spillovers and manufacturing performance in Indonesia. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, – Proefschrift, EindhovenGoogle Scholar
  17. Jourdan (2010) Links with domestic industry, downstream processing and the provision of inputs: resource based industrialisation in South Africa, 2010, Mintek, South Africa. Accessed 24 Feb 2011
  18. Kuramato J, Sagosti F (2006) Cleaning pollution: from mining to environmental remediation. In: Lorentzen J et al (eds) Lateral migration in resource intensive economies: technological learning and industrial policy. HSRC, pp 93–128, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  19. Lorentzen J (2006) Innovation in resource-based technology clusters: investigating the lateral migration thesis. Human Science Research Council, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  20. Lorentzen J (ed) (2008) Resource intensity, knowledge and development. HSRC Press, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  21. Lorentzen J, Pogue TE (2009) Knowledge intensification in resource-based developing economies: from technologies learning to lateral migration. Institute for Economic Research on Innovation working paper 2009-04, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  22. Los B (2000) The empirical performance of a new interindustry technology spillover measure. In: Saviotti PP, Nooteboom B (eds) Technology and knowledge: from the firm to innovation systems. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 118–151Google Scholar
  23. National Science Foundation (1969) Technology in retrospect and critical events in science: TRACES. National Science Foundation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Pogue TE, Rampa M (2006) Innovation in resource-based technology clusters: investigating the lateral migration thesis. An analysis of hydraulic technologies in South Africa’s mining sector. Human Science research Council RSA, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  25. Productivity Commission (2007) Public support for science and innovation. Productivity Commission, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  26. Reserve Bank of Australia (2009) The level and distribution of recent mining sector revenue, Reserve Bank Bulletin – January 2009.
  27. Salter AJ, Martin BR (2001) The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Res Policy 30:509–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scherer FM (1982) Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth. Rev Econ Stat 64(4):627–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Swan W (2010) Exposure draft: tax laws amendment (research and development) bill 2010. Commonwealth of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  30. Tedesco L, Haseltine C (2010) An economic survey of companies in the Australian mining technology services and equipment sector, 2006–07 to 2008–09. ABARE-BRS report 10.7, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  31. Terleckyj N (1980) Direct and indirect effects of industrial research and development on the productivity growth of industries. In: Kendrick J, Vaccara B (eds) New developments in productivity measurement and analysis. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. Topp V, Soames L, Parham D, Bloch H (2008) Productivity in the mining sector: measurement and interpretation. Staff working paper, Productivity Commission, Dec 2008Google Scholar
  33. Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND J Econ 20(1):172–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walker M, Farisani L (2006) Innovation in resource-based technology clusters: investigating the lateral migration thesis: the manufacture of biodegradable plastics from maize starch, Employment-oriented industry studies. Human Science Research Council RSA, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  35. Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Turpin
    • 1
  • Hao Tan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Phil Toner
    • 1
    • 3
  • Sam Garrett-Jones
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre for Industry and Innovation StudiesUniversity of Western SydneyChurch PointAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Business and LawUniversity of Newcastle, AustraliaCallaghanAustralia
  3. 3.University of Western SydneyUminaAustralia
  4. 4.School of Management and Marketing, Faculty of CommerceUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations