Advertisement

The Enrollment in an R&D Subsidy Program for SMEs: Evidence from Southwest Germany

Chapter
Part of the International Studies in Entrepreneurship book series (ISEN, volume 28)

Abstract

The literature on R&D subsidy programs has mainly focused on final R&D outcomes and has largely ignored the processes that operate within subsidy programs. The implementation of programs and allocation of funds might have a profound impact on the final economic outcome though.

We discuss the targeting process of R&D subsidy programs and analyze empirically the Enrolment in a particular R&D promotion program. Companies applying for the program we analyze often seem not to have complete knowledge on their projects and project partners when applying for funds. About one out of five companies does not conduct the project it was granted money for. Dropouts are not random; companies that were planning to cooperate with “high quality” R&D institutions in the scope of the project and those from core cities are more likely not to conduct their projects. In line with our expectations we are also able to show that companies which have cooperated with R&D institutions before are more likely to conduct their projects than those without cooperation experience.

Keywords

Support Program Private Firm Promotion Program Small Company Allocation Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arrow KJ (1962) Economic welfare and the allocations of resources of invention. In: Nelson R, Nelson RR (eds) The rate and direction of inventive activity: economic and social factors. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  2. Aschhoff B (2008) Who gets the money? The dynamics of R&D project subsidies in Germany. ZEW discussion paper 09–018Google Scholar
  3. Aschhoff B (2009) The effect of R&D project subsidies on R&D revisited. The role of firms subsidy history and subsidy size. Working paper presented at the summer conference 2009 on Copenhagen Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  4. Asheim BT, Gertler MS (2005) The geography of innovation – regional innovation systems. In: Fagerberg J et al (eds) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanes JV, Busom I (2004) Who participates in R&D subsidy programs? The case of Spanish manufacturing firms. Res Pol 22:1459–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Czarnitzki D, Toole AA (2006) Business R&D and the interplay of R&D subsidies and market uncertainty. ZEW discussion paper 06–055Google Scholar
  7. David PA, Hall BH, Toole AA (2000) Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Res Pol 29(4–5):497–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Desmet K, Kujal P, Lobo F (2004) Implementing R&D policies: an analysis of Spain´s pharmaceutical research program. Res Pol 33:1493–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Falk R (2005) Behavioural additionality effects of R&D subsidies: empirical evidence from Austria. Paper presented at the 32nd conference of the European association of research in industrial economics (EARIE), PortoGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldman MP, Kelley MR (2006) The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behaviour. Res Pol 35:1509–1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hall B (2002) The financing of research and development. Oxf Rev Econ Pol 18(1):35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heckman JJ, Smith JA (2004) The determinants of participation in a social program: evidence from a prototypical job training program. J Labor Econ 22(2):243–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heijs J (2003) Freerider behaviour and the public finance of R&D activities in enterprises: the case of the Spanish low interest credits for R&D. Res Pol 32(3):225–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klette TJ, Moen J, Griliches Z (2000) Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failure? Microeconomic evaluation studies. Res Pol 29:471–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koski H, Tuuli J (2010) Business subsidies in Finland: the dynamics of application and acceptance stages. Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Elinkeinoelämän Tutkimuslaitos, discussion papers, no 1225Google Scholar
  16. Lundvall B-A (1992) National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Mohen P (1996) R&D externalities and productivity growth. STI Rev 18:39–66Google Scholar
  18. Mora-Valentin EM, Montoro-Sanchez A, Guerras-Martin L (2002) Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations. In: Peoceedings of 28th EIBA conference, 2002, AthensGoogle Scholar
  19. Nelson RR (1959) The simple economics of basic scientific research. J Polit Econ 67:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nelson RR (1993) National systems of innovation: a comparative study. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Porter ME (2000) Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Econ Dev Quart 14:15–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stiglitz JE, Weiss A (1981) Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. Am Econ Rev 71(3):393–410Google Scholar
  23. Tanayama T (2007) Eligibility, awareness and the application decision: an empirical study of the firm participation in an R&D subsidy program. Helsinki center of economic research discussion paper no 161Google Scholar
  24. Tanayama T (2009) Rationales and reality of R&D subsidies: are SMEs and large firms treated differently? Helsinki center of economic research discussion paper no 280Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research fellow Center for SME Research, research fellow chair for SME Research and Entrepreneurship, Institut für MittelstandsforschungUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany
  2. 2.Senior research fellow Center for SME research, Institut für MittelstandsforschungUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany
  3. 3.Center for SME Research University of Mannheim, chair for SME Research and Entrepreneurship, Institut für MittelstandsforschungUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations