Skip to main content

Boom-Year Savings and Budgetary Forecasting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
State Government Budget Stabilization

Part of the book series: Studies in Public Choice ((SIPC,volume 8))

  • 902 Accesses

Abstract

The forecasting of government expenditure and revenue is the outcome of complicated, often intense interaction between multiple key players in the budgeting process and multifarious aspects of government operations. The existing literature is very rich on the technical aspects but is relatively thin on the impact of institutions under the public choice perspective, especially those in financial administration, the budget stabilization fund (BSF) being a typical example. This chapter aims to fill in the niche by focusing on how BSF affects forecasting. BSF as a countercyclical fiscal policy tool was created as precautionary savings against revenue shortfalls, serving to reduce financial uncertainty from cyclical fluctuations. BSF is a formal institution with an underlying public choice motive to promote fiscal and budgetary transparency: BSF legislation is written to protect savings from political spending pressure and opportunistic electoral politics. However, public finance does not operate in vacuum; BSF cannot stay free of politics. Presence of savings inherently triggers complications in the politico-technical forecasting machine. This chapter examines state forecasts of their revenue with a BSF in place to see whether adopting BSF has any impact on forecast errors and how the structural features and size of BSF influence the forecasting behavior. I use a panel (49 states, ­1979/1988–2007) plus details of state BSF features, with controls for state demographics, economy, politics, and other budgetary institutions. This chapter will contribute to the public choice literature by providing evidence on the effects of BSF on behavioral changes of state governments in their revenue forecasts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Auerbach AJ (1999) On the performance and use of government revenue forecasts. Natl Tax J 52(4):765–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Bails D (1982) A critique of the effectiveness of tax and expenditure limitations. Public Choice 38:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohn H, Inman RP (1996) Balanced-budget rules and public deficits: evidence from the U.S. states. Paper read at Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy. NBER working paper no. 5533, Rochester, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan G, Buchanan JM (1980) The power to tax: analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretschneider S, Gorr W (1992) Economic, organizational, and political influences on biases in forecasting state sales tax receipts. Int J Forecast 7(4):457–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretschneider S, Gorr W, Grizzle G, Klay E (1989) Political and organizational influences on the accuracy of forecasting state government revenues. Int J Forecast 5(3):307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretschneider S, Bunch B, Gorr W (1992) Revenue forecasting errors in Pennsylvania local government budgeting: sources of variation. Public Budg Financ Manag 4(3):721–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JM (1975) Public finance and public choice. Natl Tax J 28(4):383–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy G, Kamlet MS, Nagin DS (1989) An empirical examination of bias in revenue forecasts by state governments. Int J Forecast 5(3):321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas JW, Gaddie RK (2002) State rainy day funds and fiscal crises: rainy day funds and the 1990–1991 recession revisited. Public Budg Finance 22(1):19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs TA, Figlio DN (1999) Do tax and expenditure limits provide a free lunch? Evidence on the link between limits and public sector service quality. Natl Tax J 52(1):113–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RC (1984) “Statement before the Intergovernmental Relations and Human Resources Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations.” In U.S. Congress (1985), 101–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry WM (1989) Do state revenue forecasters utilize available information? Natl Tax J 42(4):429–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold SD (1983) Preparing for the next recession: rainy day funds and other tools for the states. Legislative Finance paper no. 41, National conference of state legislatures, Denver, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou Y (2003) What stabilizes state general fund spending during downturns? Public Budg Finance 23(3):64–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Y (2004) Budget stabilization fund: structural features of the enabling legislation and balance levels. Public Budg Finance 24(3):38–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Y (2005) Fiscal reserves and state own-source expenditure in downturns. Public Finance Rev 33(1):117–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Y (2006) Budgeting for fiscal stability over the business cycle. Public Adm Rev 66(5):730–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Y (2010) Local fiscal behavior under subnational provisions: do local governments smooth revenue from booms across busts? J Public Finance Public Choice XXVIII(1):3–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou Y, Brewer G (2010) Supplementation and substitution between two saving devices. Public Adm Rev 70(6):14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Y, Duncombe WD (2008) State saving behavior: effects of two fiscal and budgetary institutions. Public Budg Finance 28(3):48–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight B, Levinson A (1999) Rainy day funds and state government savings. Natl Tax J 52(3):459–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause GA, Lewis DE, Douglas JW (2006) Political appointments, civil service systems, and bureaucratic competence: organizational balancing and executive branch revenue forecasts in the American states. Am J Polit Sci 50:770–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson A (1998) Balanced budgets and business cycles: evidence from the states. Natl Tax J 51(4):715–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Mocan HN, Azad S (1995) Accuracy and rationality of state general fund revenue forecasts: evidence from panel data. Int J Forecast 11(3):417–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mushkin SJ, Lupo GC (1967) Is there a conservative bias in state-local sector expenditure projections? Natl Tax J 20(3):282–291

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of State Budget Officers (1995) Budget processes in the states, various years. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of State Budget Officers (1977–2010). The Fiscal Survey of States. Various years. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association. The book of the states, series (since 1935). National Governors Association, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus W (1975) The political business cycle. Rev Econ Stud 42:169–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penner RG (2002) Dealing with uncertain budget forecasts. Public Budg Finance 22(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plesko GA (1988) The accuracy of government forecasts and budget projections. Natl Tax J 41(4):483–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Poterba J (1994) State responses to fiscal crises: the effects of budgetary institutions and politics. J Polit Econ 102(4):799–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafuse RW (1965) Cyclical behavior of state-local finances. In Musgrave RA (ed) Essays in fiscal federalism, 118. The Brookings Institution: Washington, D.C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers R, Joyce P (1996) The effect of underforecasting on the accuracy of revenue forecasts by state governments. Public Adm Rev 56(1):48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff K (1990) Equilibrium political budget cycles. Am Econ Rev 80(1):21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadbegian RJ (1999) The effect of tax and expenditure limitations on the revenue structure of local government 1962–87. Natl Tax J 52(2):221–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel RS, Holcombe RG (1996) The impact of state rainy day funds in easing state fiscal crises during the 1990–1991 recession. Public Budg Finance 16(3):28–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocker FD (ed) (1991) Proposition 13: a ten-year retrospective, introduction. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundelson JW (1935) Budgetary principles. Polit Sci Q 50:236–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees W (2006) Consistent underestimation bias, the asymmetric loss function and homogeneous sources of bias in revenue forecasting. J Public Budg Account Financ Manag 18(1):61–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GA (2003) Are budget stabilization funds only the illusion of savings: evidence from stationary panel data? Q Rev Econ Finance 43(2):213–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GA, Sobel S (2006) State budget stabilization fund adoption: preparing for the next recession or circumventing fiscal constraints? Public Choice 126(1):177–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hou, Y. (2013). Boom-Year Savings and Budgetary Forecasting. In: State Government Budget Stabilization. Studies in Public Choice, vol 8. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6061-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics