Advertisement

Materiality and Meaning: The Search for the Rochambeau Camp in Fairfax County, VA

  • Douglas Comer
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Archaeology book series (BRIEFSARCHAE, volume 1)

Abstract

Archaeologists play societal roles, ranging from the adventurer in popular culture to the expert in an esoteric realm who is entrusted with the care of minutia that the public understands to be of value in ways that engage them sporadically. In many places in the world today, the task that most archaeologists have been assigned it to inventory and evaluate archaeological sites and other materials. This began in the United States with the passage of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, and the scope of the task rapidly expanded with the development of implementing regulations. Most states and many local governments have developed comparable legislation and regulations. The trajectory and timeframes in many other countries are similar. Thus, archaeologists now contribute to the construction of collective memories, and the identities that follow suit. I argue here that the archaeological record is therefore best though to as a public good, and one that must be protected as are other public goods such as water, fresh air, and knowledge. The archaeological record provides data with which to evaluate histories and identities constructed in ways to advance transitory political and social objectives that do not benefit the public at large. The materiality of archaeological material can be more persuasive because it provides an experience and as such is often more difficult to evaluate critically than is text. Thus, it becomes incumbent on the archaeologists to provide a critical evaluation for the public; without this, chances increase that material will be presented in misleading ways.

Keywords

Public Good Archaeological Site Collective Memory Historic Site Archaeological Material 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Chernow, R. (2004). Alexander Hamilton. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Fitzpatrick, J. C. (Ed.). (1932). The writings of George Washington from the original manuscript sources 1745–1799 (Vol. 6). Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
  4. Ford, N. G. (2002). Issues of war and peace. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  5. Gillis, J. R. (1994). Commemorations: The politics of national identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Rice, H. C., Jr., & Brown, A. S. K. (1972). The American campaigns of Rochambeau’s Army 1780, 1781, 1782, 1783 (Vol. 2). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ricoeur, P. (2004) Memory, history, forgetting (Blamey, B. & Pellauer, D. Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press (Original work published 2000).Google Scholar
  9. Scott, S. F. (1998). From Yorktown to Valmay: The transformation of the French army in the age of revolution. Denver, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  10. Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387–389. doi: 10.2307/1925895 DOI:10.2307%2F1925895. JSTOR 1925895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Selig, R. (2009). Revolutionary war route and transportation survey in the Commonwealth of Virginia, 1781–1782, and historical and architectural survey. Manuscript on file, Virginia Department of Historic Resources, Commonwealth of Virginia, Richmond, VA.Google Scholar
  12. Shiffer, M. B. (1988). The structure of archaeological theory. American Antiquity, 53, 461–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Silberman, N. A. (1982). Digging for god and country: Exploration, archeology, and the secret struggle for the Holy Land, 1799–1917. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  14. Silberman, N. A. (1989). Between past and present: Archaeology, ideology, and nationalism in the modern Middle East. New York, NY: H. Holt.Google Scholar
  15. United States Department of Agriculture. (2010). Custom Soil Resource Report for Fairfax County, Virginia. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  16. Weeks, J. (2003). Gettysburg: Memory, market, and an American shrine. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Committee on Archaeological Heritage Management (ICAHM)BaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations