Abstract
This chapter focuses on individual differences in object and spatial–visual imagery both from theoretical and applied perspectives. While object imagery refers to representations of the literal appearances of individual objects and scenes in terms of their shape, color, and texture, spatial imagery refers to representations of the spatial relations among objects, locations of objects in space, movements of objects and their parts, and other complex spatial transformations. First, we review cognitive neuroscience and psychology research regarding the dissociation between object and spatial–visual imagery. Next, we discuss evidence on how this dissociation extends to individual differences in object and spatial imagery, followed by a discussion showing that individual differences in object and spatial imagery follow different developmental courses. After that we focus on cognitive and educational research that provides ecological validation of the object–spatial distinction in individual differences—in particular, on the relationship of object and spatial–visual abilities to mathematics and science problem solving and then to object–spatial imagery differences between members of different professions. Finally, we discuss applications of the object–spatial dissociation in imagery for applied fields, such as personnel selection, training, and education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Object and spatial imagery abilities might be independent but also might tap the same underlying visual imagery ability. In the latter case, this underlying ability would not rely exclusively on object or spatial pathways but would also depend on other brain areas involved in visual processing (e.g., prefrontal cortex, early visual areas).
- 2.
Humanities and social science students and professionals were included in Blajenkova et al. (2006) and Blazhenkova and Kozhevnikov (2010) to serve as a control professional group, since the humanities and social sciences lend themselves to visual forms of information processing less readily than do natural sciences. In addition, the imagery used by humanities/science professionals is more along the lines of logical representations of concepts and relationships among concepts rather than representing the arrangement of physical objects or graphs and data models (e.g., Wai et al. 2009).
References
Amedi A, Malach R, Pascual-Leone A (2005) Negative BOLD differentiates visual imagery and perception. Neuron 48(5):859–872
Aspinwall L, Shaw KL, Presmeg NC (1997) Uncontrollable mental imagery: graphical connections between a function and its derivative. Educ Stud Math 33(3):301–317
Blajenkova O, Kozhevnikov M, Motes MA (2006) Object–spatial imagery: a new self-report imagery questionnaire. Appl Cogn Psychol 20(2):239–263
Blazhenkova O, Kozhevnikov M (2009) The new object–spatial–verbal cognitive style model: theory and measurement. Appl Cogn Psychol 23(5):638–663
Blazhenkova O, Kozhevnikov M (2010) Visual–object ability: a new dimension of non-verbal intelligence. Cognition 117(3):276–301
Blazhenkova O, Becker M, Kozhevnikov M (2011) Object–spatial imagery and verbal cognitive styles in children and adolescents. Learn Individ Differ 21(3):281–287
Borst G, Thompson WL, Kosslyn SM (2011) Understanding the dorsal and ventral systems of the human cerebral cortex: beyond dichotomies. Am Psychol 66(7):624–632
Brewer W, Schommer-Aikins M (2006) Scientists are not deficient in mental imagery: Galton revised. Rev Gen Psychol 10:104–120
Campos A, Sueiro E (1993) Sex and age differences in visual imagery vividness. J Mental Imagery 17(3–4):91–94
Carpenter PA, Just MA (1986) Spatial ability: an information-processing approach to psychometrics. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, vol 3. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ
Carpenter PA, Just MA, Shell P (1990) What one intelligence test measures: a theoretical account of the processing in the Raven progressive matrices test. Psychol Rev 97(3):404–431
Clarkson PC, Presmeg N (eds) (2008) Critical Issues in Mathematics Education: Major Contributions of Alan Bishop. Springer, Dordrecht
Collins DW, Kimura D (1997) A large sex difference on a two-dimensional mental rotation task. Behav Neurosci 111(4):845
Courtney SM, Petit L, Maisog J, Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV (1998) An area specialized for spatial working memory in human frontal cortex. Science 279:1347–1351
Danzer GA, Newman M (1992) Excerpt from “Tuning In”, a curriculum development project. The camera’s eye. Imagery Technol 83:134
Darling S, Della Sala S, Logie RH, Cantagallo A (2006) Neuropsychological evidence for separating components of visuo-spatial working memory. J Neurol 253:176–180
Darling S, Della Sala S, Logie RH (2007) Behavioural evidence for separating components within visuo-spatial working memory. J Cogn Process 8:175–181
DAT Users Manual Dental Admission Testing Program User’s Manual. Report 3; 2011
Ekstrom RB, French JW, Harman HH (1976) Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ
Farah MJ, Hammond KM, Levine DN, Calvanio R (1988) Visual and spatial mental imagery: dissociable systems of representation. Cogn Psychol 20:439–462
Ferguson E (1977) The mind’s eye: nonverbal thought in technology. Sci New Ser 197(4306):827–836
Galton F (1880) Statistics of mental imagery. Mind 5:301–318
Gardner H (1999) Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. Basic Books, New York, NY
Gardner H, Hatch T (1989) Multiple intelligences go to school: educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educ Res 18(8):4–9
Ghiselli EE (1973) The validity of aptitude tests in personnel selection. Pers Psychol 26:461–477
Gottfredson L (1997) Mainstream science on intelligence: an editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence 24(1):13–23
Hegarty M, Just MA (1989) Understanding machines from text and diagrams. In: Mandl H, Levin J (eds) Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Picture. North Holland, Amsterdam
Hegarty M, Kozhevnikov M (1999) Types of visual–spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. J Educ Psychol 91(4):684–689
Holliday F (1943) The relation between psychological test scores and subsequent proficiency of apprentices in the engineering industry. Occup Psychol 17:168–185
Kassels S (1991) Transforming imagery into art: a study of the life and work of Georgia O’Keeffe. In: Kunzendorf RG (ed) Mental Imagery. Plenum Press, New York, NY
Kosslyn SM (1994) Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Kosslyn SM, Koenig O (1992) Wet Mind: The New Cognitive Neuroscience. Free Press, New York, NY
Kosslyn SM, Thompson WL, Ganis G (2006) The Case for Mental Imagery. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
Kozhevnikov M, Thornton R (2006) Real-time data display, spatial visualization ability, and learning force and motion concepts. J Sci Educ Technol 15(1):111–132
Kozhevnikov M, Hegarty M, Mayer RE (2002) Revising the visualizer-verbalizer dimension: evidence for two types of visualizers. Cogn Instr 20:47–77
Kozhevnikov M, Kosslyn S, Shephard J (2005) Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual cognitive style. Mem Cognit 33(4):710–726
Kozhevnikov M, Motes M, Hegarty M (2007) Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cogn Sci 31:549–579
Kozhevnikov M, Blazhenkova O, Becker M (2010) Trade-off in object versus spatial visualization abilities: restriction in the development of visual-processing resources. Psychon Bull Rev 17:29–35
Lacey S, Lin JB, Sathian K (2011) Object and spatial imagery dimensions in visuo-haptic representations. Exp Brain Res 213(2–3):267–273
Lamm C, Bauer H, Vitouch O, Gstattner R (1999) Differences in the ability to process a visuo-spatial task are reflected in event-related slow cortical potentials of human subjects. Neurosci Lett 269:137–140
Larkin JH, Simon HA (1987) Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cogn Sci 11:65–100
Levine DN, Warach J, Farah MJ (1985) Two visual systems in mental imagery: dissociation of ‘what’ and ‘where’ in imagery disorders due to bilateral posterior cerebral lesions. Neurology 35:1010–1018
Lindauer MS (1983) Imagery and the arts. In: Sheihk AA (ed) Imagery: Current Theory, Research, and Application. Wiley, New York, NY
Linn MC, Petersen AC (1985) Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Dev 56:1479–1498
Linn MC, Layman J, Nachmias R (1987) Cognitive consequences of microcomputer-based laboratories: graphing skills development. Contemp Educ Psychol 12:244–253
Logie RH (2003) Spatial and visual working memory: a mental workspace. Psychol Learn Motiv 42:37–78
Logie RH, Marchetti C (1991) Visuospatial working memory: visual, spatial or central executive? In: Logie RH, Denis M (eds) Mental Images in Human Cognition. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Lohman DF, Nichols PD (1990) Training spatial abilities: effects of practice on rotation and synthesis tasks. Learn Individ Differ 2:67–93
Lord T, Holland M (1997) Preservice secondary education majors and visual-spatial perception: an important cognitive aptitude in the teaching of science and mathematics. J Sci Teacher Educ 8:43–53
Lubinski D (2004) Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman’s (1904) “‘General intelligence’, objectively determined and measured”. J Pers Soc Psychol 86:96–111
Luria AR (1982) The mind of a mnemonist. In: Neisser U (ed) Memory Observed: Remembering in Natural Context. Freeman, San Francisco, CA
Mandl H, Levin JR (eds) (1989) Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Manovich L (2001) The Language of New Media. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Marks DF (1973) Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. Br J Psychol 64(1):17–24
Marks DF (1983) Mental imagery and consciousness: a theoretical review. In: Shiekh AA (ed) Imagery: Current Theory, Research, and Application. Wiley, New York, NY
Mazard A, Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Crivello F, Mazoyer B, Mellet E (2004) A PET meta-analysis of object and spatial mental imagery. Eur J Cogn Psychol 16:673–695
McGee MG (1979) Human spatial abilities: psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychol Bull 86:889–918
McKelvie SJ (1995) The VVIQ as a psychometric test of individual differences in visual imagery vividness: a critical quantitative review and plea for direction. J Mental Imagery 19:1–106
Miller AI (1996) Insights of Genius Imagery and Creativity in Science and Art. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Miyake A, Friedman NP, Shah P, Rettinger DA, Hegarty M (2001) How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen 130(4):621–640
Mokros J, Tinker R (1987) The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children’s ability to interpret graphs. J Res Sci Teach 24:369–383
Motes MA, Malach R, Kozhevnikov M (2008) Object-processing neural efficiency differentiates object from spatial visualizers. Neuroreport 19:1727–1731
Nicholson KG, Humphrey GK (2003) The effect of colour congruency on shape discriminations of novel objects. Perception 32:339–353
Paivio A (1971) Imagery and Verbal Processes. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Oxford
Pallrand GJ, Seeber F (1984) Spatial ability and achievement in introductory physics. J Res Sci Teach 21:507–516
Pellegrino JW, Mumaw RJ, Shute VJ (1985) Analyses of spatial aptitude and expertise. In: Embretson S (ed) Test Design: Contributions From Psychology, Education and Psychometrics. Academic, New York, NY
Plass JL, Chun DM, Mayer RE, Leutner D (1998) Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second language multimedia learning environment. J Psychol 90:25–36
Presmeg NC (1986a) Visualization and mathematical giftedness. Educ Stud Math 17:297–311
Presmeg NC (1986b) Visualization in high school mathematics. Learn Math 63(3):42–46
Presmeg NC (1992) Prototypes, metaphors, metonymies, and imaginative rationality in high school mathematics. Educ Stud Math 23:595–610
Raven J, Raven JC, Court JH (1998) Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales: Section 4, Advanced Progressive Matrices, sets I and II. Oxford Psychologists Press, Oxford
Reichle ED, Carpenter PA, Just MA (2000) The neural bases of strategy and skill in sentence-picture verification. Cogn Psychol 40:260–295
Roe A (1975) Painters and painting. In: Taylor IA, Getzels JW (eds) Perspectives in Creativity. Aldine, Chicago, IL
Roid GH (2003) Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales 5th edn.: Examiner’s Manual. Riverside Publishing, Itasca, IL
Rosenberg HS (1987) Visual artists and imagery. Imagin Cogn Pers 7:77–93
Rypma B, D’Esposito M (2000) Isolating the neural mechanisms of age-related changes in human working memory. Nat Neurosci 3:509–515
Shepard RN, Metzler J (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171(3972):701–703
Siu KWM, Ng AWY, Chan CCH (2011) The imagery vividness and preferences of older people: implications for visualization in concept design. Design J 14(4):413–426
Smith IM (1964) Spatial Ability: Its Educational and Social Significance. University of London Press, London
Snyderman M, Rothman S (1987) Survey of expert opinion on intelligence and aptitude testing. Am Psychol 42:137–144
Sternberg RJ (1985) Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
Thornton R, Sokoloff D (1990) Learning motion concepts using real-time micro-computer-based laboratory tools. Am J Phys 58:858–867
Twyman A (1972) Imagery and Mathematical Activity. The Psychology of Mathematics Education, Chelsea College, London
Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M (1982) Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW (eds) Analysis of Visual Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Van Leijenhorst L, Crone EA, Van der Molen MW (2007) Developmental trends for object and spatial working memory: a psychophysiological analysis. Child Dev 78(3):987–1000
Vandenberg SG, Kuse AR (1978) Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Percept Mot Skills 47:599–604
Vitouch O, Bauer H, Gittler G, Leodolter M, Leodolter U (1997) Cortical activity of good and poor spatial test performers during spatial and verbal processing studied with Slow Potential Topography. Int J Psychophysiol 27:183–199
Voyer D, Voyer S, Bryden M (1995) Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychol Bull 117:250–270
Wai J, Lubinski D, Benbow CP (2009) Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over fifty years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. J Educ Psychol 101:817–835
Webb RM, Lubinski D, Benbow CP (2007) Spatial ability: a neglected dimension in talent searches for intellectually precocious youth. J Educ Psychol 99:397–420
Wechsler D (1997) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—3rd edn. (WAIS-3). Harcourt Assessment, San Antonio, TX
Winn W, Li T, Schill D (1991) Diagrams as aids to problem solving: their role in facilitating search and computation. Educ Technol Res Dev 17:17–29
Winner E, Pariser D (1985) Giftedness in the visual arts. Items 31(4):65–69
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kozhevnikov, M., Blazhenkova, O. (2013). Individual Differences in Object Versus Spatial Imagery: From Neural Correlates to Real-World Applications. In: Lacey, S., Lawson, R. (eds) Multisensory Imagery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5879-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5879-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5878-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5879-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)